- Page 1: Mapping climate vulnerability and p
- Page 5 and 6: Executive Summary The world’s cli
- Page 7 and 8: Project Team At the International L
- Page 9 and 10: Figures Figure 1. Representation of
- Page 11 and 12: 1 Background The world’s climate
- Page 13 and 14: pointing up the need for adaptation
- Page 15 and 16: information on how current and futu
- Page 17 and 18: sensitivity of the human environmen
- Page 19 and 20: Figure 2. Systems approach - vulner
- Page 21 and 22: The second stage was to characteriz
- Page 23 and 24: meaningful way, so current rainfall
- Page 25 and 26: Table 2. The Emissions Scenarios of
- Page 27 and 28: need to be taken into account for m
- Page 29 and 30: precision. An index of the 16 milli
- Page 31 and 32: Figure 4. Estimated radiative forci
- Page 33 and 34: Figure 6 for 2000, also at a resolu
- Page 35 and 36: Figure 7 (A). Percentage changes in
- Page 37 and 38: Figure 7 (C). Percentage changes in
- Page 39 and 40: Figure 8 (A). Percentage changes in
- Page 41 and 42: off-setting the wetter conditions,
- Page 43 and 44: • Forest-based systems (cassava,
- Page 45 and 46: Table 3. System codes used in the r
- Page 47 and 48: Table 5. Country-by-system breakdow
- Page 49 and 50: Figure 10. Areas within the LGA and
- Page 51 and 52: Table 7. Country-by-system breakdow
- Page 53 and 54:
The results of the analysis of numb
- Page 55 and 56:
Figure12. Percentage of failed seas
- Page 57 and 58:
clearly needed if useful classifica
- Page 59 and 60:
availability issues that limited ou
- Page 61 and 62:
Type Indicator Descriptor Hypothesi
- Page 63 and 64:
associated with each road arc, and
- Page 65 and 66:
standard (National Center for Healt
- Page 67 and 68:
The correlation matrix for the four
- Page 69 and 70:
Table 10. Correlation matrix for th
- Page 71 and 72:
Figure 13. Country-by-systems, show
- Page 73 and 74:
5.3 Uncertainties in the analysis A
- Page 75 and 76:
and inland water systems in the tro
- Page 77 and 78:
6. User needs Recent months have se
- Page 79 and 80:
Regarding the effects of climate ch
- Page 81 and 82:
accuracy, and limited international
- Page 83 and 84:
Institutional capacity needs assess
- Page 85 and 86:
another 33 % contribute through inf
- Page 87 and 88:
for sectoral research in Africa. Re
- Page 89 and 90:
change quite rapidly, however, and
- Page 91 and 92:
in the specific context of impact a
- Page 93 and 94:
Again, the framework is generic; th
- Page 95 and 96:
7. Conclusions Climate change poses
- Page 97 and 98:
the human health perspective, but i
- Page 99 and 100:
Database (UNEP/GRID), and World Res
- Page 101 and 102:
HDR (Human Development Report) (200
- Page 103 and 104:
Mitchell T D (2003). Guidance notes
- Page 105 and 106:
30 November 2004, 50 pp. Online at
- Page 107 and 108:
Appendix 1. Inception workshop part
- Page 109 and 110:
Appendix 3 Country by system table
- Page 111 and 112:
Malawi 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.6 22.4 0.0 24
- Page 113 and 114:
Kenya Forestry Research Institute(K
- Page 115 and 116:
Note 1. Indicators of Adaptive Capa
- Page 117 and 118:
Table 1. Determinants of adaptive c
- Page 119 and 120:
Agricultural dependency is measured
- Page 121 and 122:
3) Strong (unreclaimable at farm le
- Page 123 and 124:
Based on the selected variables a d
- Page 125 and 126:
Note 2. South-South Cooperation 123
- Page 127 and 128:
technology. This is an impediment f
- Page 129 and 130:
Recently, a new variety of rice (NE
- Page 131 and 132:
References CLACC, 2005. www.clacc.n
- Page 133 and 134:
Note 3. Climate Change and Health i
- Page 135 and 136:
5. The long time span of climate ch
- Page 137 and 138:
Climate change and vector-borne dis
- Page 139 and 140:
Although the principal causes of ma
- Page 141 and 142:
another temporarily, seasonally or
- Page 143 and 144:
Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerabili
- Page 145 and 146:
Note 4. The climate, development, a
- Page 147 and 148:
The Third Assessment Report of the
- Page 149 and 150:
human carrying capacity was 13 pers
- Page 151 and 152:
2. Broader capacity building throug
- Page 153 and 154:
Cooperation is needed in research,
- Page 155 and 156:
Note 5. The Sub-Saharan Africa Chal
- Page 157 and 158:
Table 1. Non-spatial criteria for a
- Page 159 and 160:
Note 6. The ASARECA priority settin
- Page 161 and 162:
• HLH: A small domain in terms of
- Page 163 and 164:
Note 7. The SLP’s food-feed impac
- Page 165 and 166:
that the user can select to map out
- Page 167 and 168:
Note 8. The SAKSS poverty targettin
- Page 169 and 170:
One tool that is being developed is
- Page 171 and 172:
Note 9. Simulating regional product
- Page 173:
Figure 1. Simulated rain-fed maize