30.03.2015 Views

Lead Plaintiff's Opposition to CSFB MSJ 11/13/06 - The ENRON Fraud

Lead Plaintiff's Opposition to CSFB MSJ 11/13/06 - The ENRON Fraud

Lead Plaintiff's Opposition to CSFB MSJ 11/13/06 - The ENRON Fraud

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• <strong>CSFB</strong> unders<strong>to</strong>od, inter alia, that the share-trust transactions it did with Enron<br />

“were a way <strong>to</strong> finance assets and were not true operating companies” (id., 50).<br />

2. LJM2 and New Power Allegations<br />

In a further attempt <strong>to</strong> divert the Court’s attention from the merits, <strong>CSFB</strong> next accuses<br />

<strong>Lead</strong> Plaintiff of making false allegations about its role in the deceptive LJM2 vehicle. Defs’<br />

Mem. at 16-17. <strong>CSFB</strong> challenges the allegation that “‘[<strong>CSFB</strong>], or senior executives of the firm,<br />

invested $22.5 million in equity money <strong>to</strong> facilitate the financing of LJM2’” and claims “[n]ot a<br />

single <strong>CSFB</strong> or DLJ executive made a personal investment in LJM2, let alone the $22.5 million<br />

alleged in the Complaint.” Id. at 16 (quoting FACC 712). 15<br />

Plaintiffs never claimed <strong>CSFB</strong><br />

executives invested $22.5 million in LJM2, but instead pleaded “CS First Bos<strong>to</strong>n, or senior<br />

executives of the firm, invested $22.5 million in [LJM2] . . . [by] using DLJ Fund Investing<br />

Trust Partners and Merchant Capital . . . .” See FACC 712; see also FACC 102(a) (defining<br />

“CS First Bos<strong>to</strong>n” <strong>to</strong> include <strong>CSFB</strong> and DLJ). Merchant Capital and DLJ Fund Investment did<br />

invest in LJM2, as plaintiffs alleged (with slight misnomer for the DLJ Fund) and as <strong>CSFB</strong><br />

admitted on page 16 of its Motion. <strong>CSFB</strong>, however, omitted these entities from the very<br />

sentence it now claims was false. And DLJ Fund did invest monies of DLJ “executives” in<br />

LJM2. <strong>CSFB</strong>SJ Ex. 2, 2 16 (DLJ Fund “managed approximately $575 million invested by over<br />

600 employees of Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette . . . and its affiliates.”). 17<br />

15<br />

All “FACC _” or “FACC _” references refer <strong>to</strong> the First Amended Consolidated<br />

Complaint (“FACC”) (Docket No. <strong>13</strong>88).<br />

16<br />

All references <strong>to</strong> “<strong>CSFB</strong>SJ Ex. __” refer <strong>to</strong> the exhibits attached <strong>to</strong> the Declaration of<br />

Odean L. Volker (Docket No. 4825).<br />

17<br />

<strong>CSFB</strong> emphasizes it and DLJ “committed” <strong>to</strong> investing in LJM2 – in contrast <strong>to</strong> having<br />

actually invested – only $15 million. Defs’ Mem. at 16. Commitment <strong>to</strong> invest versus actual<br />

investment is just semantics and in no way evidences any intent <strong>to</strong> mislead the Court. As for the<br />

$22.5 million number, <strong>CSFB</strong> invested $15 million in LJM2 plus the $7.5 million the Bank<br />

- 12 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!