acta facultatis educationis physicae universitatis comenianae

More documents

Recommendations

Info

18 Martin Sebera – Jaromír Sedláček mediate selection is sort of confirmation of initial talent identification. After intermediate selection is over selected children proceed to basic training. Final Talent Identification Roughly by the end of basic training after about 3 years of training coaches and selectors expect some sort of reasonably high performance at Junior State / National level. The age would vary depending on the event and will be in the range of 11 – 12 years for ‘young sports’, 13 – 14 for ‘normal’ and 16 – 17 years for ‘old’ ones. At this age and with above experience in sport one should reach certain performance level. This round of Talent Development process we suggest to term as Talent Recognition/Orientation. Two major questions need to be answered at this stage of selection. The first one is: which event or game role/position within chosen sport is to be identified for further deep specialization? Another question is: whether an athlete possesses physical, technical, tactical, functional and psychological reserves, developed or inherited to reach International level of performance in seniors’ level? Thus, thorough examination of motor qualities, specific abilities and skills, physiological, psychological reserves as well as actual performance is highly advisable. The decision bares serious financial investments as well – especially in the countries where top performance sport is funded by the state, meaning, tax payers’ money involved. Tests should be of a very specific nature. Some of the tests though, should reflect general physical fitness as well. Ratio between general and specific tests reaches about 30:70. Moreover, general tests are selected only from among the contributing to the performance of the chosen event. Final decision has to be taken after obtaining the opinion of experts in respective events. When the final talent recognition is concluded and decisions approved, comes the time for the selected individuals to get into the stage of specialized training. And the main event for this specialized training has to be precisely identified at the described stage of talent recognition. What happens with a talent next is in fact Talent Development with more and more special training means and load increase of successfully performing athletes in a rather task (performance) oriented manner. It is occurring on periodical basis when best of the best need to be selected either to the camp, squad or a team. Those actually have nothing to do with talent identification as such, but are rather related to picking the right ones from among the best available for preparations to perform in particular high standard competitions. Conclusion Suggesting a new Principle Model of Talent Recognition Looking at the process of talent handling in the broader prospective, it looks logic to suggest certain changes to the traditional definition of ‘Talent Identification’ as such. And since Talent Identification is actually just a part of continuum, corresponding to a very particular stage in the much broader process, it seems right not to generalize it but to treat as a stage in the Talent Recognition process. Therefore, suggested multistage principle model of Talent Recognition may be presented as in Fig. 1. Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports
Analyze of sport talent selection systems 19 Talent Detection Talent Identification Talent Confirmation Talent Recognition/ Orientation Talent Development/ Special Training Talent Development Model Figure 1 Principle model of Talent Recognition Comprehensive Talent Development model should address the issues of: • Talent development through one sports (straight forward one early sport career) • Talent migration/transfer) in case original talent identification wasn’t successful (dual to multiple early sport career) • Talent retention/recycling (transfer of talent in later stages of sport career) References 1. FISHER, R. J., BORMS, J. 1990. The Search for Sporting Exellence. Scherndorf : Hoffman Verlag. 146 p. 2. GLESK, P., HARSANYI, L. 1998. Výber talentov so zameraním na atletiku. Bratislava : SAZ, 1998. ISBN 80-227-1155-1. 3. HARSÁNYI, L., MARTIN, M. 1983. Zur Auswahl sportlicher Talente. In Leistungsport, 13(2), 1983, p. 21-24. 4. HAVLÍČEK, I. 1982. Systém športovej prípravy talentovanej mládeže. In Tréner (6), 1982, p. 242-245. 5. HOARE, D. 1996.Coaching Focus, The National Coaching Foundation. Talent Identification and Development: The Australian Talent Search Programme, 1996. 6. KRASILSHCHIKOV, O, SEBASTIAN, PJ, MANILAL, KP, SAJU JOSEPH, VC. 1995. The system of Long-term training and selection of talented sports persons. NIS Scientific Journal. Vol. 18, No 2. p. 26-40. 7. KRASILSHCHIKOV, O. 2010. Talent Identification and Development – International Trends and Principle Models. Buletin Kejurulatihan Majlis Sukan Negara Malaysia, 2010, p. 5-15. ISSN 2180-3773. 8. MORAVEC et al 2004. Teória a didaktika športu. Bratislava : FTVŠ UK a SVS TVŠ, 2004. 212 p. ISBN 80-89075-22-3. 9. PELTOLA, E. 1992. Talent Identification an Overview. IAAF: 7(3), 7-12. 10. PLATONOV, VN. 2002. Teoria General del Entrenamiento Deportivo Olimpico. Paidotribo Editorial, 2002. 686 p. 11. SEDLÁČEK, J. et al 1994. The Inffluence of the Political Changes on the High Performance Sport Organization in Czechoslovakia. In WILCOX, CR Sport in the Global Village. Fitness Information Technology, Inc., 1994,p. 341-347. ISBN 0-9627926-4-0. 12. WILLIAMS, AM, REILLY, T. 2000. Talent identification and development in soccer. Journal of Sports Sciences: 18, 657-667. 13. WOODMAN, L. 1985. Talent identification – Is competition enough. Sports Coach: 9(1), 49-57. Acta Facultatis Educationis Physicae Universitatis Comenianae LII/I
Page 1 and 2: ACTA FACULTATIS EDUCATIONIS PHYSICA
Page 3: Contents 3 CONTENTS THE SUBJECTIVE
Page 6 and 7: 6 Durdica Miletic items were taken
Page 8 and 9: 8 Durdica Miletic Table 1 Factor An
Page 10 and 11: 10 Durdica Miletic influence these
Page 12 and 13: 12 Durdica Miletic 20. REJESKI, W.
Page 14 and 15: 14 Martin Sebera - Jaromír Sedlá
Page 22 and 23: 22 Marián Vanderka - Adrián Novos
Page 30 and 31: 30 Miroslav Huntata - Ludmila Zaple
Page 42 and 43: 42 Juraj Karas considered the range
Page 44 and 45: 44 Juraj Karas The manufacturer cla
Page 46 and 47: 46 Juraj Karas Figure 4 The coeffic
Page 48 and 49: 48 Juraj Karas Comenius University
Page 50 and 51: 50 Vladimír Přidal - Jaroslav Han
Page 62 and 63: 62 Dagmar Nemček - Jela Labudová
Page 68 and 69:
68 Dagmar Nemček - Jela Labudová
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
74 Martin Vaváček - Marek Hardoň
Page 76 and 77:
76 Martin Vaváček - Marek Hardoň
Page 78:
ACTA FACULTATIS EDUCATIONIS PHYSICA
show all

acta facultatis educationis physicae universitatis comenianae

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?