acta facultatis educationis physicae universitatis comenianae

More documents

Recommendations

Info

38 Miroslav Huntata – Ludmila Zapletalová 1v1 in defence and the defensive zone could appear relatively surprisingly. This is perhaps caused by relatively low occurrence of effectively resolved man-to-man fights by defensemen in that zone. The opponent’s attack disruption occurred frequently perhaps because of other faults of the attacking team (bad pass, non-processed pass, zone loss, etc.). Bukač et al. (1980) draw up similar conclusions, and ascertained that the winning teams were more effective in man-to-man fights in particular in the attacking zone, and this zone has been identified as the most important space from the viewpoint of strategy. Our analysis of the issue indicates that the control over the object of the game is important also from the aspect of the match result (Jones, James, Mellalieu, 2004; Bazanov, Haljand, Võhandu, 2005; Van Rooyen, Noakes, 2006). However, the time of puck carrying by a team in ice hockey has never been investigated. There exist sporadic attempts to record the active time of a selected player on ice, which is in fact the time spent by carrying the puck in a match; such statistics however does not exist for the team as a whole as it exists in football. From this aspect, we consider our results original. We ascertained that the winning teams carry the puck significantly longer in the neutral and attacking zones, but this duration is not different from that of the losing teams in the defensive zone. Here, however, it must be noted that the time of puck carrying in the neutral zone is very short in both the winning and losing teams. It represents about 17 % of the total time of puck carrying. This corresponds to the current trend to reach the attacking zone as simply and quickly as possible. The time of puck carrying by a team in the neutral zone is really short. The time of puck carrying in the attacking zone represents 52 % of the total time of puck carrying in a match. This finding is logical. If a team carries the puck, it is in offence and all its effort is directed to the attacking zone. Here, the most significant differences between the winning and the losing team are manifested. According to our findings, we may consider the time of puck carrying, and especially the ability of a team to carry the puck in the attacking zone, one of the important prerequisites of success in a match. Conclusions Differences in game performance parameters between the winning and losing teams have been confirmed in various scopes. The winning teams were significantly better in all the parameters relating to effectiveness, i.e. in shooting, saves, power play or penalty kill. They were significantly better also in effective solutions to situations 1v1 in total as well as in offence. As regards localisation of those situations within individual zones, significant differences for the benefit of the winning team were manifested only in the attacking zone, based on which it can be stated that this zone is the most important for effectiveness of solutions to situations 1v1 in offence. We did not find any differences in effective solutions to situations 1v1 in defence, neither in total nor from the aspect of individual zones of the rink. As regards puck carrying, the winning teams were significantly better both in the overall control and in puck carrying within the attacking and neutral zones. Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports
Differences in game performance parameters of winning and losing ice-hockey teams 39 References 1. ANDREJKOVIČ, I. 2008 Vzťah úspešnosti riešenia herných situácií v zápasoch a v tréningovom procese dorastencov v ľadovom hokeji. Dizertačná práca. Bratislava : Univerzita Komenského, 2008. 98 pp. 2. BUKAČ, L. a kol. 1980. Poznatky z analýzy utkání Mistrovství světa a Evropy v ledním hokeji v Praze 1978. Praha : Sportpropag, 1980. 127 pp. 3. BAZANOV, B., HALJAND, R., VÕHANDU, P. 2005. Offensive teamwork intensity as a factor influencing the result in basketball. In International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. [online]. 2005, vol. 5, no. 2. ISSN 1474-8185 4. DOBRÝ, L., SEMIGINOVSKÝ, B. 1988. Sportovní hry: výkon a trénink. Praha : Olympia, 1988. 197 pp. ISBN 27-051-88. 5. HIANIK, J. 2010. Vzťah ukazovateľov herného výkonu družstva k výsledku zápasu. Bratislava : Univerzita Komenského, 2010. 128 pp. ISBN 978-80-8113-019-9. 6. HUGHES, M. D., BARTLETT, R. M. 2002. The use of performance parameters in performance analysis. In J. Sport Science, 2002, 20. no 5, pp.739-754. ISNN 0264-0414. 7. JONES, D. P., JAMES, N., MELLALIEU, D., S., 2004. Possession as a performance indicator in soccer. In International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. [online] 2004, vol. 4, no. 1. ISSN 1474-8185. 8. JONES, B., M., 2009. Scoring First and Home Advantage in the NHL. In International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. [online] 2009, vol. 9, no. 3. ISSN 1474-8185. 9. OSTKA, V., BUKAČ, L., DOVALIL, J. 1979. Technicko-taktická příprava : Obrana – útok. In Jednotný tréninkový systém v ledním hokeji II : Dospělí, 1979. pp. 26-65. 10. MAČURA, P., POTOCKÝ, F. 2009. Vplyv herných činností jednotlivca na víťazstvo v basketbalovom zápase. In Zborník vedeckých prác katedry hier FTVŠ UK v Bratislave č. 14. Bratislava : Peter Mačura PEEM, 2009, pp. 7-13. ISBN 978-80-8113-014-4. 11. LAGO, C. 2007. Are winners different from losers? Performance and chance in the FIFA World Cup Germany 2006. In International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. [online]. 2007, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 36-47. ISSN 1474-8185. 12. PSOTTA, R. 2009. Kategoriální systémy pozorování herního výkonu. In SÜSS, V., BUCHTEL, J. et al. Hodnocení herního výkonu ve sportovních hrách. Praha : Karolinum, 2009, pp. 21-27. ISBN 978-80-246-1680-3. 13. SAMPAIO, J., JANEIRA, M. 2003. Statistical analysis of basketball team performance: understanding teams´ wins and losses according to a different index of ball possessions. In International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. [online]. 2003, vol. 3, no. 1. ISSN 1474-8185. 14. TÓTH, I. 2003. Herný výkon 10 až 17 ročných hráčov ľadového hokeja z hľadiska kvantitatívnych a kvalitatívnych herných charakteristík. Dizertačná práca. Bratislava : Univerzita Komenského, 2003. 149 pp. 15. VAN ROOYEN, M., K., - NOAKES, T., D. 2006. Movement time as a predictor of success in the 2003 Rugby World Cup Tournament. In International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. [online]. 2006, vol. 6, no. 1. ISSN 1474-8185. Acta Facultatis Educationis Physicae Universitatis Comenianae LII/I
Page 1 and 2: ACTA FACULTATIS EDUCATIONIS PHYSICA
Page 3: Contents 3 CONTENTS THE SUBJECTIVE
Page 6 and 7: 6 Durdica Miletic items were taken
Page 8 and 9: 8 Durdica Miletic Table 1 Factor An
Page 10 and 11: 10 Durdica Miletic influence these
Page 12 and 13: 12 Durdica Miletic 20. REJESKI, W.
Page 14 and 15: 14 Martin Sebera - Jaromír Sedlá
Page 22 and 23: 22 Marián Vanderka - Adrián Novos
Page 30 and 31: 30 Miroslav Huntata - Ludmila Zaple
Page 42 and 43: 42 Juraj Karas considered the range
Page 44 and 45: 44 Juraj Karas The manufacturer cla
Page 46 and 47: 46 Juraj Karas Figure 4 The coeffic
Page 48 and 49: 48 Juraj Karas Comenius University
Page 50 and 51: 50 Vladimír Přidal - Jaroslav Han
Page 62 and 63: 62 Dagmar Nemček - Jela Labudová
Page 74 and 75: 74 Martin Vaváček - Marek Hardoň
Page 76 and 77: 76 Martin Vaváček - Marek Hardoň
Page 78: ACTA FACULTATIS EDUCATIONIS PHYSICA

acta facultatis educationis physicae universitatis comenianae

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?