Relationship of Glycemia to Cardiovascular Disease ... - Lipids Online
Relationship of Glycemia to Cardiovascular Disease ... - Lipids Online
Relationship of Glycemia to Cardiovascular Disease ... - Lipids Online
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Non–UKPDS Trials:<br />
Metformin vs. Other Interventions<br />
RR (Fixed) 95% CI<br />
Study<br />
All-cause mortality<br />
DeFronzo 1995<br />
Hor<strong>to</strong>n 2000<br />
Sub<strong>to</strong>tal (95% CI)<br />
MET<br />
n/N<br />
1/210<br />
1/178<br />
388<br />
Favours<br />
Comparison Metformin<br />
0/209<br />
0/172<br />
381<br />
Favours Weight<br />
Comparison (%)<br />
49.6<br />
50.4<br />
100.0<br />
RR (fixed)<br />
95% CI<br />
2.99 [0.12, 72.88]<br />
2.90 [0.12, 70.69]<br />
2.94 [0.31, 28.16]<br />
Ischemic heart disease<br />
DeFronzo 1995<br />
1/210<br />
0/209<br />
25.2<br />
2.99 [0.12, 72.88]<br />
Hallsten 2002<br />
1/13<br />
0/14<br />
24.2<br />
3.21 [0.14, 72.55]<br />
Hor<strong>to</strong>n 2000<br />
1/178<br />
0/172<br />
25.5<br />
2.90 [0.12, 70.69]<br />
Teupe 1991<br />
1/50<br />
0/50<br />
25.1<br />
3.00 [0.13, 71.92]<br />
Sub<strong>to</strong>tal (95% CI)<br />
451<br />
445<br />
100.0<br />
3.02 [0.62, 14.75]<br />
0.01 0.1 1 10 100<br />
CI = confidence interval; MET = metformin; RR = relative risk;<br />
UKPDS = United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study<br />
Reprinted from Saenz A, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.<br />
2005;(3):CD002966, with permission from Wiley.<br />
Slide Source<br />
<strong>Lipids</strong> <strong>Online</strong> Slide Library<br />
www.lipidsonline.org<br />
Non–UKPDS Trials: Metformin vs. Other Interventions<br />
When one looks at metformin data in studies outside <strong>of</strong> the United Kingdom Prospective<br />
Diabetes Study, however, there apparently is no evidence <strong>of</strong> cardiovascular benefit, as in<br />
this meta-analysis conducted by Saenz et al. (2005). Furthermore, these other studies tend<br />
<strong>to</strong> have small numbers <strong>of</strong> patients.<br />
Reference:<br />
Saenz A, Fernandez-Esteban I, Mataix A, Ausejo M, Roque M, Moher D. Metformin<br />
monotherapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.<br />
2005;(3):CD002966.<br />
Non–UKPDS Trials:<br />
Metformin vs. Conventional Treatment<br />
RR (Fixed) 95% CI<br />
UKPDS<br />
Any diabetes-related<br />
outcomes<br />
MET<br />
n/N<br />
98/342<br />
Conventional Favours<br />
n/N metformin<br />
160/411<br />
Favours Weight<br />
comparison (%)<br />
100.0<br />
RR (fixed)<br />
95% CI<br />
0.74 [0.60, 0.90]<br />
Diabetes-related<br />
death<br />
28/342<br />
55/411<br />
100.0<br />
0.61 [0.40, 0.94]<br />
All-cause mortality<br />
50/342<br />
89/411<br />
100.0<br />
0.68 [0.49, 0.93]<br />
Myocardial infarction<br />
39/342<br />
73/411<br />
100.0<br />
0.64 [0.45, 0.92]<br />
Stroke<br />
12/342<br />
23/411<br />
100.0<br />
0.63 [0.32, 1.24]<br />
Peripheral vascular<br />
disease<br />
6/342<br />
9/411<br />
100.0<br />
0.80 [0.29, 2.23]<br />
Microvascular<br />
24/342<br />
38/411<br />
100.0<br />
0.76 [0.46, 1.24]<br />
0.2 0.5 1 2 5<br />
CI = confidence interval; MET = metformin; RR = relative risk;<br />
UKPDS = United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study<br />
Reprinted from Saenz A, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.<br />
2005;(3):CD002966, with permission from Wiley.<br />
Slide Source<br />
<strong>Lipids</strong> <strong>Online</strong> Slide Library<br />
www.lipidsonline.org<br />
Source: <strong>Lipids</strong> <strong>Online</strong> Slide Library (www.lipidsonline.org) Page 13 <strong>of</strong> 36<br />
© 2009 Baylor College <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Hous<strong>to</strong>n, Texas