Bicycle Railing Height Report - AASHTO - Subcommittee on Design
Bicycle Railing Height Report - AASHTO - Subcommittee on Design
Bicycle Railing Height Report - AASHTO - Subcommittee on Design
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
DETERMINATION OF APPROPRIATE RAILING HEIGHTS FOR BICYCLISTS<br />
NCHRP 20-7 (168)<br />
Chapter 4 - Survey Results<br />
A preference survey was c<strong>on</strong>ducted during January and February 2004. The survey was<br />
posted <strong>on</strong> the internet, and state bicycle and pedestrian coordinators and advocacy groups<br />
were asked (via regular and electr<strong>on</strong>ic mail) to participate. The Associati<strong>on</strong> of Pedestrian<br />
and <str<strong>on</strong>g>Bicycle</str<strong>on</strong>g> Professi<strong>on</strong>als (APBP) list serve was also m<strong>on</strong>itored for opini<strong>on</strong>s and<br />
informati<strong>on</strong> relative to bicycle railings.<br />
Survey Resp<strong>on</strong>dents<br />
The primary purpose of the survey was to identify height preferences, and determine real<br />
and perceived issues related to the height of bicycle railings. Two bicycle railing height<br />
surveys were created: <strong>on</strong>e for state representatives and <strong>on</strong>e for bicycle advocacy groups.<br />
Appendix A provides the state and advocacy bicycle railing height surveys.<br />
The state bicycle railing height survey questi<strong>on</strong>ed resp<strong>on</strong>dents as to their state of practice<br />
regarding railing heights, and solicited informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> crash events and data. The<br />
advocacy bicycle railing height survey questi<strong>on</strong>ed resp<strong>on</strong>dents as to their group’s<br />
preference of railing height, and also solicited informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> crash events.<br />
Thirty-four (34) individual resp<strong>on</strong>dents provided their professi<strong>on</strong>al title (i.e., bicycle<br />
coordinator or bridge/design engineer) in the state bicycle survey, as outlined below.<br />
• 24 bicycle coordinators and transportati<strong>on</strong>/trail planners completed the survey,<br />
which represented 71% of those resp<strong>on</strong>dents who provided their titles.<br />
• 10 bridge/design engineers completed the survey, which represented 29% of those<br />
resp<strong>on</strong>dents who provided their titles.<br />
Twenty-seven (27) representatives of advocacy groups and internati<strong>on</strong>al transportati<strong>on</strong><br />
agencies provided their professi<strong>on</strong>al titles for the advocacy bicycle survey. The titles<br />
included presidents, directors, and planners.<br />
The bicycle surveys also solicited the opini<strong>on</strong>s of bicycle users and facility designers<br />
regarding the advantages and disadvantages of a 1.4-meter (54-inch) versus a 1.1-meter<br />
(42-inch) railing height. State bicycle coordinators and bicycle advocates expressed<br />
similar sentiment regarding the advantages and disadvantages of each height.<br />
17