17.04.2015 Views

Bicycle Railing Height Report - AASHTO - Subcommittee on Design

Bicycle Railing Height Report - AASHTO - Subcommittee on Design

Bicycle Railing Height Report - AASHTO - Subcommittee on Design

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DETERMINATION OF APPROPRIATE RAILING HEIGHTS FOR BICYCLISTS<br />

NCHRP 20-7 (168)<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Railing</str<strong>on</strong>g> Used as a Physical Barrier<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Railing</str<strong>on</strong>g>s are often used as a physical barrier to protect a bicyclist from descending a slope<br />

or from colliding with an adjacent hazard when insufficient space is available to separate<br />

a bicycle facility from the hazard. According to the <str<strong>on</strong>g>AASHTO</str<strong>on</strong>g> “Guide for the<br />

Development of <str<strong>on</strong>g>Bicycle</str<strong>on</strong>g> Facilities”, a 1.5-meter (5-foot) separati<strong>on</strong> between the<br />

pavement and the top of a slope or hazard is desirable. The guide states, “Depending <strong>on</strong><br />

the height of the embankment and c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> at the bottom, a physical barrier, such as<br />

dense shrubbery, railing or chain link fence, may need to be provided.” The<br />

recommended height of the barrier is not specified.<br />

A railing that is used as physical barrier is not intended to keep a bicyclist from falling or<br />

vaulting over the barrier. Its intent is to prevent the bicyclist from colliding with the<br />

hazard. For example, a bicyclist riding <strong>on</strong> a shared use path built <strong>on</strong> an embankment with<br />

a steep slope could possibly lose c<strong>on</strong>trol and descend down the slope <strong>on</strong> the bicycle. The<br />

high speed collisi<strong>on</strong> or fall at the bottom of the slope could result in severe injury. If the<br />

out-of-c<strong>on</strong>trol bicyclist were to collide with a barrier, a hedge or railing, and fall at the<br />

top of the slope, the resulting injury would not be as severe and the high speed collisi<strong>on</strong><br />

at the bottom of the slope would have been prevented.<br />

Many states have provided additi<strong>on</strong>al guidance for the requirement for a railing <strong>on</strong> top of<br />

slopes. The need for a railing or barrier is usually a functi<strong>on</strong> of degree of slope and<br />

height of embankment. These guidelines do not appear to be based <strong>on</strong> scientific or<br />

empirical data. The c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> at the bottom of slope may be a better indicator of the need<br />

for a barrier.<br />

Where a slope is not steep (not greater than 1:3) and sufficient clearance from the path<br />

and the top of slope cannot be achieved, a 1.2-meter (48-inch) bicycle railing would not<br />

be necessary because there is no need to keep a bicyclist from falling over the railing. In<br />

these locati<strong>on</strong>s a barrier of sufficient height that could keep the bicyclist from an out-ofc<strong>on</strong>trol<br />

descent down the slope would be adequate. The aesthetics and ability to see over<br />

the barrier by all users should be a c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> when establishing the height of the<br />

railing or other physical barrier.<br />

Other <strong>Design</strong> C<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

The visual impact of a bicycle railing is a real c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>, especially al<strong>on</strong>g scenic<br />

corridors. The primary c<strong>on</strong>cern in these c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s is the transparency of the railing<br />

system.<br />

Steel and aluminum structural elements of a railing system can be visually thinner than<br />

wood elements, allowing individuals to see through a railing system. However, a typical<br />

“rustic” wood post and wood board railing system may be more visually compatible in a<br />

natural setting. Yet, wood boards can greatly obstruct a view.<br />

36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!