- Page 3:
GHA REPORT 2010
- Page 7 and 8:
GLOBAL TRENDS Humanitarian interven
- Page 9 and 10:
DONORS AND RECIPIENTS: AN INCREASIN
- Page 11 and 12:
FIGURE 4: GOVERNMENT CONTRIBUTIONS
- Page 13 and 14:
PRIORITIES COUNTRIES IN CONFLICT Hu
- Page 15 and 16:
that are rather difficult to attrib
- Page 17 and 18:
DOMESTIC RESPONSE It is absolutely
- Page 19:
GOVERNMENTS Government donors and t
- Page 23 and 24:
FIGURE 2: DAC DONOR CONTRIBUTIONS T
- Page 25 and 26:
FIGURE 5: SHARES OF HUMANITARIAN AI
- Page 27 and 28:
FIGURE 7: CHANNELS OF HUMANITARIAN
- Page 29 and 30:
TABLE 1: COUNTRIES FEATURING AS TOP
- Page 31 and 32:
Together, the top 10 recipients of
- Page 33 and 34:
FIGURE 1: A BREAKDOWN OF DAC DONORS
- Page 35 and 36:
TABLE 3: TOP NON-DAC DONORS IN EACH
- Page 37 and 38:
FIGURE 13: TOP 10 RECIPIENTS OF NON
- Page 39 and 40:
TABLE 2: GOVERNMENT DONOR FUNDING T
- Page 41 and 42:
GOVERNMENT DONOR PRIORITIES, PATTER
- Page 43 and 44:
FIGURE 18: SECTORAL EXPENDITURE AS
- Page 45:
TABLE 6: DAC AND NON-DAC DONOR SUPP
- Page 49 and 50:
FINANCING MECHANISMS Until 2005 the
- Page 51 and 52:
FIGURE 2: TOP 10 DONORS TO HUMANITA
- Page 53 and 54:
On the one hand it could be said th
- Page 55 and 56:
two former funds were established i
- Page 57 and 58:
Sudan Sudan witnessed ongoing confl
- Page 59 and 60:
TABLE 6: MATRIX OF IN-COUNTRY FINAN
- Page 61:
WHAT IS THE FUTURE OF HUMANITARIAN
- Page 64 and 65:
DELIVERING HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE
- Page 66 and 67:
2006-2008, the remainder funded lar
- Page 68 and 69:
FIGURE 9: INCREASE IN UN INCOME FRO
- Page 70 and 71:
DELIVERY AGENCY RECIPIENTS If we ex
- Page 72 and 73:
TABLE 2: TOP TEN RECIPIENTS OF HUMA
- Page 74 and 75:
DOMESTIC RESPONSE: TIMELINE FOLLOWI
- Page 76 and 77:
WHAT DO WE MEAN BY ‘DOMESTIC RESP
- Page 78 and 79:
Government leadership in natural di
- Page 80 and 81:
THE GENERAL PUBLIC The act of givin
- Page 82 and 83: Bangladesh Bangladesh is a country
- Page 85 and 86: Uganda Plagued by conflict between
- Page 87: efore external support started reac
- Page 90 and 91: CONFLICT AND AID States affected by
- Page 92 and 93: Unsurprisingly the countries with h
- Page 94 and 95: 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
- Page 96 and 97: internally displaced people (IDPs),
- Page 98 and 99: FIGURE 6: ODA FROM OECD DAC DONORS
- Page 100 and 101: The OECD DAC’s eligibility criter
- Page 102 and 103: THE MILITARY AS A HUMANITARIAN ACTO
- Page 104 and 105: FIGURE 9: US AID CHANNELLED THROUGH
- Page 106 and 107: 102
- Page 108 and 109: WHAT DO WE KNOW NOW ABOUT FUNDING A
- Page 110 and 111: as being people in need of immediat
- Page 112 and 113: million more for DRC in 2009 compar
- Page 114 and 115: THE UN CONSOLIDATED APPEALS PROCESS
- Page 116 and 117: FIGURE 6: APPEAL FUNDING AS SHARE O
- Page 118 and 119: The appeal in DRC has undergone fur
- Page 120 and 121: Whilst giving is commendable in res
- Page 122 and 123: appeals in 2005 saw a 76.5% increas
- Page 124 and 125: 120
- Page 126 and 127: THE FUTURE OF HUMANITARIAN AID? HUM
- Page 128 and 129: FIGURE 3: HUMANITARIAN AID FROM GOV
- Page 130 and 131: Somalia and DPRK). Another 10 recei
- Page 134 and 135: WHY IS COUNTING HUMANITARIAN AID SO
- Page 136 and 137: the capacity of certain sets of act
- Page 138 and 139: While providing coverage of contrib
- Page 140 and 141: US$ DATA SOURCE INTERNATIONAL NGOS
- Page 142 and 143: SPECIFIC NOTES ON FTS USE IN GHA RE
- Page 144 and 145: DAC-reported humanitarian aid inclu
- Page 146 and 147: BASIC CONCEPTS AND DEFINITIONS Cent
- Page 148 and 149: Multilateral ODA Organisation for E
- Page 150 and 151: IATI ICRC IFRC IfS IMC IMF INGO IRC
- Page 152 and 153: REFERENCE TABLES TABLE 1: TOP 30 RE
- Page 154 and 155: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS THANK YOU The Glob
- Page 156: GHA Report 2010 presents the very l