GHA-Report-2010.pdf - Global Humanitarian Assistance

More documents

Recommendations

Info

RECIPIENT COUNTRIES Sudan proved to be the largest recipient of DAC donor humanitarian expenditure for the fourth consecutive year in 2008. Its US$1.4 billion represented 13.7% of the total allocated by DAC donors to specific countries. While its share of the total declined in 2008 (from 17.1% in 2007), the actual volume of aid to the country increased by US$56 million. The next largest recipient was Afghanistan (US$868 million), followed by Ethiopia (US$829 million). Seven of the top 10 recipients of DAC donor humanitarian assistance in 2007 remained within the top 10 list in 2008 – Sudan, Palestine/OPT, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Afghanistan, Ethiopia, Somalia and Iraq. Meanwhile, Lebanon, Pakistan and Indonesia were replaced in the top 10 by Myanmar, Zimbabwe and Kenya – subjects of a UN flash appeal, UN consolidated appeal and emergency plan respectively in 2008. (See Figure 8.) Sudan has been by far the largest single recipient of DAC donor assistance since 1999, accounting for US$8.2 billion (11.4%) of the US$72 billion disbursements to specific countries. Palestine/OPT has received the next largest share (9%) or US$6.5 billion of the total, followed by Iraq with US$5.8 billion or 8.1% of the total. Nearly 48% of Iraq’s humanitarian aid over the last 10 years came in 2003 and 2004. (See Table 1 & 2.) FIGURE 8: SHARES OF HUMANITARIAN AID FROM DAC DONORS, 2008 Others US$3.8bn 37.5% Sudan US$1.4bn 13.7% 8.5% Afganistan US$ 868.36m 8.1% Ethiopia US$ 828.65m 3% Kenya US$ 301.75m 3.3% 3.5% 3.7% Zimbabwe US$ 332.7m Myanmar US$ 379.24m Iraq US$ 379.24m 7.8% OPT/Palestine US$ 792.69m 5.5% 5.4% Somalia US$ 562.63m DRC US$ 545.16m Source: OECD DAC 24
TABLE 1: COUNTRIES FEATURING AS TOP 10 RECIPIENTS OF DAC HUMANITARIAN AID, 1999-2008 TIMES IN THE TOP 10 TOTAL RECEIVED (US$m) SHARE OF TOTAL ALLOCABLE TO ALL COUNTRIES SHARE OF TOTAL ALLOCABLE TO TOP 10 COUNTRIES HUMANITARIAN AID AS A SHARE OF ODA IN THE PERIOD Sudan 10 8.2bn 11.4% 19.5% 69.8% Palestine/OPT 10 6.5bn 9.0% 15.3% 46.8% Iraq 10 5.7bn 8.1% 13.8% 9.4% Afghanistan 9 5.3bn 7.5% 12.7% 23.7% Ethiopia 9 4.6bn 6.5% 11.0% 23.5% DRC 8 3.1bn 4.4% 7.5% 16.4% Bosnia-Herzegovina 2 2.7bn 3.8% 6.5% 33.6% Serbia 3 2.6bn 3.8% 6.4% 16.3% States Ex-Yugoslavia 3 2.4bn 3.3% 5.7% 70.2% Somalia 3 2.3bn 3.3% 5.6% 74.1% Indonesia 4 2.2bn 3.1% 5.3% 13.5% Angola 6 2.0bn 2.9% 4.9% 38.4% Lebanon 2 1.9bn 2.7% 4.6% 44.0% Uganda 2 1.7bn 2.4% 4.1% 12.3% Pakistan 3 1.7bn 2.4% 4.1% 9.5% Kenya 1 1.5bn 2.2% 3.7% 18.3% Burundi 2 2.4bn 2.0% 3.4% 42.0% Sri Lanka 1 1.3bn 1.9% 3.3% 21.6% Liberia 1 1.3bn 1.8% 3.1% 39.8% Zimbabwe 2 1.1bn 1.6% 2.7% 32.8% DPRK 2 1.1bn 1.5% 2.6% 60.7% Eritrea 1 946.7m 1.3% 2.2% 33.3% Sierra Leone 1 920.1m 1.3% 2.2% 22.5% India 1 774.7m 1.1% 1.8% 4.5% Myanmar 1 711.3m 1.0% 1.7% 38.3% Mozambique 1 697.9m 1.0% 1.7% 3.9% Albania 1 445.9m 0.6% 1.1% 10.3% Timor-Leste 1 384.9m 0.5% 0.9% 13.4% Source: Development Initiatives based on OCED DAC data 25
Page 3: GHA REPORT 2010
Page 7 and 8: GLOBAL TRENDS Humanitarian interven
Page 9 and 10: DONORS AND RECIPIENTS: AN INCREASIN
Page 11 and 12: FIGURE 4: GOVERNMENT CONTRIBUTIONS
Page 13 and 14: PRIORITIES COUNTRIES IN CONFLICT Hu
Page 15 and 16: that are rather difficult to attrib
Page 17 and 18: DOMESTIC RESPONSE It is absolutely
Page 19: GOVERNMENTS Government donors and t
Page 23 and 24: FIGURE 2: DAC DONOR CONTRIBUTIONS T
Page 25 and 26: FIGURE 5: SHARES OF HUMANITARIAN AI
Page 27: FIGURE 7: CHANNELS OF HUMANITARIAN
Page 31 and 32: Together, the top 10 recipients of
Page 33 and 34: FIGURE 1: A BREAKDOWN OF DAC DONORS
Page 35 and 36: TABLE 3: TOP NON-DAC DONORS IN EACH
Page 37 and 38: FIGURE 13: TOP 10 RECIPIENTS OF NON
Page 39 and 40: TABLE 2: GOVERNMENT DONOR FUNDING T
Page 41 and 42: GOVERNMENT DONOR PRIORITIES, PATTER
Page 43 and 44: FIGURE 18: SECTORAL EXPENDITURE AS
Page 45: TABLE 6: DAC AND NON-DAC DONOR SUPP
Page 49 and 50: FINANCING MECHANISMS Until 2005 the
Page 51 and 52: FIGURE 2: TOP 10 DONORS TO HUMANITA
Page 53 and 54: On the one hand it could be said th
Page 55 and 56: two former funds were established i
Page 57 and 58: Sudan Sudan witnessed ongoing confl
Page 59 and 60: TABLE 6: MATRIX OF IN-COUNTRY FINAN
Page 61: WHAT IS THE FUTURE OF HUMANITARIAN
Page 64 and 65: DELIVERING HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE
Page 66 and 67: 2006-2008, the remainder funded lar
Page 68 and 69: FIGURE 9: INCREASE IN UN INCOME FRO
Page 70 and 71: DELIVERY AGENCY RECIPIENTS If we ex
Page 72 and 73: TABLE 2: TOP TEN RECIPIENTS OF HUMA
Page 74 and 75: DOMESTIC RESPONSE: TIMELINE FOLLOWI
Page 76 and 77: WHAT DO WE MEAN BY ‘DOMESTIC RESP
Page 78 and 79:
Government leadership in natural di
Page 80 and 81:
THE GENERAL PUBLIC The act of givin
Page 82 and 83:
Bangladesh Bangladesh is a country
Page 85 and 86:
Uganda Plagued by conflict between
Page 87:
efore external support started reac
Page 90 and 91:
CONFLICT AND AID States affected by
Page 92 and 93:
Unsurprisingly the countries with h
Page 94 and 95:
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Page 96 and 97:
internally displaced people (IDPs),
Page 98 and 99:
FIGURE 6: ODA FROM OECD DAC DONORS
Page 100 and 101:
The OECD DAC’s eligibility criter
Page 102 and 103:
THE MILITARY AS A HUMANITARIAN ACTO
Page 104 and 105:
FIGURE 9: US AID CHANNELLED THROUGH
Page 106 and 107:
102
Page 108 and 109:
WHAT DO WE KNOW NOW ABOUT FUNDING A
Page 110 and 111:
as being people in need of immediat
Page 112 and 113:
million more for DRC in 2009 compar
Page 114 and 115:
THE UN CONSOLIDATED APPEALS PROCESS
Page 116 and 117:
FIGURE 6: APPEAL FUNDING AS SHARE O
Page 118 and 119:
The appeal in DRC has undergone fur
Page 120 and 121:
Whilst giving is commendable in res
Page 122 and 123:
appeals in 2005 saw a 76.5% increas
Page 124 and 125:
120
Page 126 and 127:
THE FUTURE OF HUMANITARIAN AID? HUM
Page 128 and 129:
FIGURE 3: HUMANITARIAN AID FROM GOV
Page 130 and 131:
Somalia and DPRK). Another 10 recei
Page 132 and 133:
128
Page 134 and 135:
WHY IS COUNTING HUMANITARIAN AID SO
Page 136 and 137:
the capacity of certain sets of act
Page 138 and 139:
While providing coverage of contrib
Page 140 and 141:
US$ DATA SOURCE INTERNATIONAL NGOS
Page 142 and 143:
SPECIFIC NOTES ON FTS USE IN GHA RE
Page 144 and 145:
DAC-reported humanitarian aid inclu
Page 146 and 147:
BASIC CONCEPTS AND DEFINITIONS Cent
Page 148 and 149:
Multilateral ODA Organisation for E
Page 150 and 151:
IATI ICRC IFRC IfS IMC IMF INGO IRC
Page 152 and 153:
REFERENCE TABLES TABLE 1: TOP 30 RE
Page 154 and 155:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS THANK YOU The Glob
Page 156:
GHA Report 2010 presents the very l
show all

GHA-Report-2010.pdf - Global Humanitarian Assistance

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?