26.04.2015 Views

Rubrics for Professional Practice - the State Board of Education

Rubrics for Professional Practice - the State Board of Education

Rubrics for Professional Practice - the State Board of Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

COMPONENT 3C: ENGAGING STUDENTS IN LEARNING<br />

Rationale and Explanation<br />

If one component <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> framework <strong>for</strong> teaching can claim<br />

to be <strong>the</strong> most important, it is student engagement. Engaging<br />

from planning and preparation, to establishing a supportive<br />

environment, to reflecting on classroom events. Lack <strong>of</strong><br />

engagement is generally easy to spot, manifesting itself when<br />

students doodle on <strong>the</strong>ir notebooks, pass notes, or gaze out<br />

<strong>the</strong> window. Occasionally, lack <strong>of</strong> engagement takes more<br />

aggressive <strong>for</strong>ms, creating serious discipline problems. Of<br />

DOMAIN 3: INSTRUCTION<br />

Component 3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques<br />

Elements: Quality <strong>of</strong> questions • Discussion techniques • Student participation<br />

L E V E L O F P E R F O R M A N C E<br />

ELEMENT<br />

UNSATISFACTORY BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED<br />

Quality <strong>of</strong> questions<br />

Teacher’s questions are virtually<br />

all <strong>of</strong> poor quality, with low<br />

cognitive challenge and single<br />

correct responses, and <strong>the</strong>y<br />

are asked in rapid succession.<br />

Teacher’s questions are a combination<br />

<strong>of</strong> low and high quality,<br />

posed in rapid succession.<br />

Only some invite a thoughtful<br />

response.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> teacher’s questions<br />

are <strong>of</strong> high quality.Adequate<br />

time is provided <strong>for</strong><br />

students to respond.<br />

Teacher’s questions are <strong>of</strong> uni<strong>for</strong>mly<br />

high quality, with adequate<br />

time <strong>for</strong> students to<br />

respond. Students <strong>for</strong>mulate<br />

many questions.<br />

Discussion<br />

techniques<br />

Interaction between teacher<br />

and students is predominantly<br />

recitation style, with <strong>the</strong><br />

teacher mediating all questions<br />

and answers.<br />

Teacher makes some attempt<br />

to engage students in genuine<br />

discussion ra<strong>the</strong>r than recitation,<br />

with uneven results.<br />

Teacher creates a genuine discussion<br />

among students, stepping<br />

aside when appropriate.<br />

Students assume considerable<br />

responsibility <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> success <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> discussion, initiating topics<br />

and making unsolicited<br />

contributions.<br />

Student participation<br />

A few students dominate <strong>the</strong><br />

discussion.<br />

Teacher attempts to engage all<br />

students in <strong>the</strong> discussion, but<br />

with only limited success.<br />

Teacher successfully engages all<br />

students in <strong>the</strong> discussion.<br />

Students <strong>the</strong>mselves ensure<br />

that all voices are heard in <strong>the</strong><br />

discussion.<br />

© 2007 by ASCD. All Rights Reserved. 15<br />

No part <strong>of</strong> this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any <strong>for</strong>m or by any means without permission from ASCD.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!