CONCENTRATING SOLUTIONS FOR A PLANAR ... - CAPDE
CONCENTRATING SOLUTIONS FOR A PLANAR ... - CAPDE
CONCENTRATING SOLUTIONS FOR A PLANAR ... - CAPDE
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Proof. We have already shown that the map ξ → φ ξ is a C 1 −map into<br />
H 1 0 (Ω) and then, F (ξ) is a C1 -function of ξ.<br />
Since D ξ F (ξ) = 0, we have that<br />
∫<br />
0 = −<br />
= −<br />
= −<br />
Ω<br />
2∑ m∑<br />
i=1 j=1<br />
2∑ m∑<br />
i=1 j=1<br />
(∆(U ξ + φ ξ ) + (U ξ + φ ξ ) p ) (D ξ U ξ + D ξ φ ξ )<br />
∫<br />
c ij (ξ) e U j<br />
Z ij (D ξ U ξ + D ξ φ ξ )<br />
Ω<br />
∫<br />
c ij (ξ) e U j<br />
Z ij D ξ U ξ +<br />
Ω<br />
2∑<br />
m∑<br />
i=1 j=1<br />
∫<br />
c ij (ξ) D ξ (e U j<br />
Z ij )φ ξ<br />
Ω<br />
since ∫ Ω eU j<br />
Z ij φ ξ = 0. By the expression of U ξ , we have that:<br />
m∑<br />
[<br />
1<br />
∂ (ξj ) i<br />
U ξ = −<br />
2<br />
P<br />
p−1<br />
s=1 γµ s<br />
2<br />
+<br />
p 2 (p − 1) w 1 + 1 p ∇w 0 · y + 1 p 2 ∇w 1 · y<br />
(<br />
1<br />
+<br />
2<br />
P<br />
p−1<br />
γδ j µ j<br />
(<br />
1<br />
=<br />
2<br />
P<br />
p−1<br />
γδ j µ<br />
j<br />
2<br />
p − 1 U δ s ,ξ s<br />
− 2Z 0s +<br />
) ∣∣y=<br />
x−ξs<br />
δs<br />
Z ij − 1 p ∂ iw 0 ( x − ξ j<br />
) − 1 δ j p 2 ∂ iw 1 ( x − ξ j<br />
)<br />
δ j<br />
Z ij − 1 p ∂ iw 0 ( x − ξ j<br />
) − 1 δ j p 2 ∂ iw 1 ( x − ξ j<br />
)<br />
δ j<br />
29<br />
(<br />
2<br />
p(p − 1) w 0 (5.3)<br />
]<br />
∂ (ξj ) i<br />
log µ s<br />
)<br />
)<br />
+ O( 1 γ ),<br />
since P : L ∞ (Ω) → L ∞ 1<br />
(Ω) is a continuous operator (apply to<br />
p−1 U δ s ,ξ s<br />
,<br />
Z 0s , 1 p w j( x−ξs<br />
δ s<br />
), ∇w j ( x−ξs<br />
δ s<br />
) · ( x−ξs<br />
δ s<br />
) for j = 0, 1 which are bounded in Ω in<br />
view of Lemma 2.1), and<br />
∂ (ξj ) i<br />
(<br />
e U h<br />
Z lh<br />
)<br />
(<br />
= −4δ h e U δ<br />
h<br />
il<br />
δh 2 + |x − ξ h| 2 − 6(x − ξ )<br />
h) l (x − ξ j ) i<br />
(δh 2 + |x − ξ h| 2 ) 2 δ hj<br />
+3e U h<br />
Z 0h Z lh ∂ (ξj ) i<br />
log µ h , (5.4)<br />
where δ hj denotes the Kronecker’s symbol. Hence, by (5.3)-(5.4) for i = 1, 2<br />
and j = 1, . . . , m we get that<br />
1<br />
2∑ m∑<br />
)<br />
0 = ∂ (ξj ) i<br />
F (ξ) = −<br />
2<br />
c lh (ξ)<br />
(P Z ij , P Z lh<br />
p−1<br />
H<br />
γδ j µ l=1 h=1<br />
1 0 (Ω)<br />
j<br />
( )<br />
1<br />
+O + ‖φ ξ ‖ ∞ |∂<br />
pγδ (ξj ) i<br />
(e<br />
j<br />
∫Ω<br />
U ∑ 2 m∑<br />
h<br />
Z lh )| |c lh (ξ)|<br />
l=1 h=1