Tactical Intercepts.pdf - e-HAF
Tactical Intercepts.pdf - e-HAF
Tactical Intercepts.pdf - e-HAF
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
encounters. If the fighter pilots do not feel confident engaging the enemy one-on-one in the given<br />
situation, they can attempt to isolate and attack one bogey, as shown in Figure 9.<br />
In this example the bogeys split (time "2") in response to the fighters' bracket attempt.<br />
Each fighter pilot continues to run his intercept against the nearest bogey, while at the same time<br />
discussing a plan via radio with the other pilot. The two pilots decide to neutralize the southern<br />
bogey and attack the northern one. At time "3" each fighter passes its respective bogey neutrally,<br />
on the side away from the other aircraft. The pilot of the southern fighter may want to give his<br />
bogey a little extra flight-path separation, if this can be done safely, to induce it to turn away from<br />
its wingman. After the pass, the pilot to the south heads for his wingman's position at max speed,<br />
leaving the southern bogey in the dust, time "4". By controller vector, by radar, visually, or by any<br />
other means available, the free pilot of the southern fighter must now locate the engagement to the<br />
north, attempt to pick off the northern bogey, and rejoin with the wingman before the southern<br />
bogey can re-enter the fight.<br />
Obviously there are a lot of things that can go wrong in such a scenario; thus the<br />
recommended limitation on relative individual fighter performance. Comm-jamming, degraded<br />
radar and visual environments, and additional, unknown, bogeys are some of the greatest potential<br />
hazards. In addition, the geometry for this attack is difficult when there is considerable aspect<br />
early in the intercept.<br />
Drag<br />
Description<br />
This tactic involves baiting an enemy, inducing him to pursue one fighter while he presents<br />
a shot opportunity to another. Figure 10 illustrates one example of a drag intercept.<br />
At time "1" the fighters contact bogeys on the nose and begin to shift into a trail or very<br />
sucked echelon formation. The idea is to ensure that the bogeys have radar contact with the lead<br />
fighter and to try to hide the trailer. Against bogeys with pulse-type radars and/or GCI control, this<br />
can usually be accomplished by having the trailer dive to very low altitude during the shift.<br />
Turning at right angles to the bogeys and dropping chaff is another effective tactic against both<br />
enemy fighter radars and controller radars. When the enemy fighters are expected to have Doppler<br />
radars, the same right-angle turn by the trailer, who passes fairly close to the lead aircraft if<br />
practical and then makes a significant altitude change before turning back on course, is generally<br />
sufficient to cause loss of contact with the trail fighter. In either case the leader can change altitude<br />
in the opposite direction, usually higher to enhance his chances of being detected, creating a large<br />
12