08.05.2015 Views

Tactical Intercepts.pdf - e-HAF

Tactical Intercepts.pdf - e-HAF

Tactical Intercepts.pdf - e-HAF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

caution to the winds for the advantages of deception and surprise. The only positive defensive<br />

point that can be made in its favor is the adage "A good offense is the best defense". The fighters<br />

are in a poor defensive posture throughout the intercept.<br />

They are usually too close for good mutual support before the break-away, and the low,<br />

trailing wingman is vulnerable after the split. A well-controlled situation is a prerequisite for this<br />

tactic, since an unexpected attack by enemy fighters before the break-away would probably be<br />

disastrous.<br />

The situations in which the advantages outweigh the risks of this tactic include a<br />

permissive environment in which the enemy's radar system and aircraft performance are decidedly<br />

superior to those of the friendly fighters. When facing a definite mismatch, good execution of<br />

sound tactics may not be enough. In boxing terminology, "A good big man will beat a good little<br />

man most of the time". In this case a good offense may be the only defense, and some exotic<br />

stunts may be justified if they result in enemy confusion and degraded awareness at the pass.<br />

Obviously, however, such tactics require considerable pilot training and a high level of proficiency<br />

before they can be relied on in combat; even then they cannot be expected to work as a steady diet,<br />

since the enemy will soon figure them out.<br />

There are many variations on the break-away tactic, but most begin with an initial close<br />

formation and employ a radical formation change at close range to sow confusion among the<br />

enemy. As with most hook and bracket-type attacks, the break-away is not recommended against<br />

an enemy in a significant trail formation.<br />

Cross-Block<br />

Description<br />

The cross-block, also called the weave, is another stunt tactic that is often successful<br />

against superior fighters that have a propensity for independent attacks. Figure 15 shows this<br />

tactic.<br />

At time "1" the fighters and bogeys detect each other about head-on, and the bogeys<br />

commence a pincer attack in an attempt to bracket the fighters. The fighter pilots detect this move<br />

and continue straight ahead in combat spread until they reach a point at which the bogeys can be<br />

expected to have individual radar locks on the fighters on their respective sides of the formation<br />

for the terminal phase of attack. Once again, this usually occurs by one minute to go in the<br />

intercept, and the fighters' RWR gear may provide further clues.<br />

At this point, time "2", the fighter pilots also take individual locks, but on the bogey on the<br />

opposite side of the enemy formation. This process is known as "cross-locking". The fighters then<br />

turn toward each other, crossing flight paths, in an effort to get outside the bogey each has locked,<br />

time "3". If the bogeys continue their intercepts on their originally intended victims, they too can<br />

be expected to turn inward in response to the fighters' maneuvers. The geometry of the situation<br />

tends to draw the bogeys together as they approach the merge (time "4"), making it easier for each<br />

fighter pilot to tally both bogeys, and dragging each bogey in front of an unseen fighter. Each<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!