08.05.2015 Views

Tactical Intercepts.pdf - e-HAF

Tactical Intercepts.pdf - e-HAF

Tactical Intercepts.pdf - e-HAF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

closer, this lead bogey has already begun its own stern conversion against the fighters. At time<br />

"3", just when the fighter pilots are feeling confident of a kill the lead bogey is slipping into firing<br />

position and the fighters are sandwiched. This situation can be particularly dangerous against a<br />

more maneuverable bogey, which can profit more from the available displacement than can the<br />

fighters.<br />

Because of this danger, a single-side offset to a stern conversion is not recommended<br />

against fighters in trail. The alternatives are sequential FQ attacks with all-aspect missiles, guns,<br />

or rockets on each bogey in turn, or use of a more suitable intercept tactic (one of the tactics that<br />

follow).<br />

Even with these limitations the single-side offset offers some advantages. Positively<br />

placing the bogeys on one side of the formation isolates the threat sector and reduces the chances<br />

of being bracketed by the enemy, as well as allowing the fighter pilots to choose the direction of<br />

their approach for environmental reasons. This tactic also provides reasonably good mutual<br />

support, since the fighters can remain fairly close together and are not required to venture far from<br />

a good defensive-spread formation. In general however, the single-side offset is a rather defensive<br />

tactic, since it offers the fighters few significant advantages that are not also given to the enemy.<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!