03102002 Delegated.pdf - East Hampshire District Council

1. (ST5) The development hereby permitted shall be begun within five years from the date of this
permission.
Reason To comply with the provision of Section 91(1) of the Town and Country Planning Act,
1990.
2. (ST8) The development hereby permitted shall be completed in accordance with the approved
plans and specifications. Any variation or departure from the approved plans will require the
prior approval of the Planning Authority before works commence.
Reason To ensure that the development hereby authorised is satisfactorily undertaken in the
interests of the amenity of the area.
3. (C25) All leadwork shall be carried out in accordance with the Lead Development Association's
Code of Practice.
Reason To ensure treatment is appropriate to the fabric of the dwelling.
4. (C15) The new works shall be executed in brick, mortar, flintwork, roof thatch and timber window
frames to match the existing building, details of such materials shall be submitted to and
approved by the Planning Authority before works commence.
Reason To ensure that the materials to be used are appropriate in order to maintain the
architectural interest of the building.
Informative Notes to Applicant:
1. The applicant is advised that the grant of this permission represents the optimum size of the
premises and that any further enlargement would constitute an unacceptable over-development
or intensification of building mass or use and the Planning Authority is not likely to permit any
further proposals to enlarge the premises.
________________________________________________________________________
Item No. 051
PROPOSAL: TWO STOREY SIDE EXTENSION
LOCATION: 64 Bulls Copse Lane, Waterlooville, Hampshire, PO8 9RA
REFERENCE NO. F.37452/FUL/PB PARISH: Horndean
APPLICANT: Mrs H Kabir
CASE OFFICER: Paul Bowman DATE REGISTERED: 01/08/2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REFUSED for the following reason:
1. (R5J) The proposal by virtue of its excessive ridge height and length is of poor design that
represents an unacceptable enlargement which dominates the existing dwelling to the detriment
of the character and appearance of the streetscene and the visual amenities of the surrounding
area contrary to General Strategy Policy GS5 of the East Hampshire District Local Plan: First
Review and the adopted East Hampshire District Council Design Guide for Residential
Extensions.
Informative Notes to Applicant:
32