03102002 Delegated.pdf - East Hampshire District Council
03102002 Delegated.pdf - East Hampshire District Council
03102002 Delegated.pdf - East Hampshire District Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1. The applicants are advised that there is no objection to the alteration to the flat roof, and are<br />
invited to resubmit an application for this element.<br />
________________________________________________________________________<br />
Item No. 054<br />
PROPOSAL: RAISED ROOF WITH DORMERS AND SINGLE STOREY SIDE EXTENSION<br />
LOCATION: 36 Maple Crescent, Waterlooville, <strong>Hampshire</strong>, PO8 0LP<br />
REFERENCE NO. F.36998/001/FUL/JR PARISH: Horndean<br />
APPLICANT: Mr and Mrs K Hazleden<br />
CASE OFFICER: Joanne Riley DATE REGISTERED: 05/08/2002<br />
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
PERMISSION subject to the following conditions:<br />
1. (ST5) The development hereby permitted shall be begun within five years from the date of this<br />
permission.<br />
Reason To comply with the provision of Section 91(1) of the Town and Country Planning Act,<br />
1990.<br />
2. (E3) The external materials to be used shall match, as closely as possible, in type, colour and<br />
texture those of the existing building.<br />
Reason To ensure that a harmonious visual relationship is achieved between the new and the<br />
existing developments.<br />
________________________________________________________________________<br />
Item No. 055<br />
PROPOSAL: TWO STOREY SIDE EXTENSION WITH DORMERS, DETACHED GARAGE<br />
AND SIDE EXTENSION TO GRANNY ANNEXE<br />
LOCATION: 275 London Road, Horndean, Waterlooville, <strong>Hampshire</strong>, PO8 0JE<br />
REFERENCE NO. F.21227/002/FUL/SM PARISH: Horndean<br />
APPLICANT: Mr A A Tadevossian & Mrs W A Russell<br />
CASE OFFICER: Sarah Marr DATE REGISTERED: 21/06/2002<br />
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
REFUSED for the following reasons:<br />
1. (R5G) The proposal represents the unacceptable enlargement of this dwelling to the detriment of<br />
the character and appearance of the street scene contrary to General Strategy Policy GS5 of the<br />
<strong>East</strong> <strong>Hampshire</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan: First Review.<br />
34