03102002 Delegated.pdf - East Hampshire District Council

SECTION IV 

Item No. 001 

EAST HAMPSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL 

SOUTH PLANNING COMMITTEE 

DECISIONS OF THE HEAD OF PLANNING CONTROL 

UNDER DELEGATED POWERS 

1 

PC.25/2002 

3 October 2002 

PROPOSAL: DETACHED DWELLING WITH ATTACHED GARAGE (AS AMENDED BY 

PLAN RECEIVED 12/8/2002) 

LOCATION: 13 Finchdean Road, Rowland's Castle, Hampshire, PO9 6DA 

REFERENCE NO. F.37370/FUL/NP PARISH: Rowlands Castle 

APPLICANT: Mr & Mrs A P Shortman 

CASE OFFICER: Nicky Powis DATE REGISTERED: 24/06/2002 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

REFUSED for the following reasons: 

1. (R10B) The application site lies within a designated Conservation Area and in the opinion of the 

Planning Authority the proposal would detract from rather than conserve or enhance the 

appearance thereof because of the loss of the important open space between properties and the 

cramped form of the proposal and would be contrary to Policies UB3 of the Hampshire County 

Structure Plan and the General Strategy (GS5) and Environment Policies (ENV15 - ENV19) of 

the East Hampshire District Local Plan: First Review. 

2. (R7O) The proposal would result in an undesirable and unacceptable form of development such 

that it would have an adverse effect upon the character of the area in general and the amenities 

and outlook of the occupiers of the nearby residential properties. The proposal would therefore 

be contrary to GS5 of the East Hampshire District Local Plan: First Review and UB3 of 

Hampshire County Structure Plan 1996-2011. 

3. (R12D) Inadequate visibility splays are proposed at the junction of the access with the highway 

and this would cause danger and inconvenience to users of the adjoining highway. The proposal 

is therefore contrary to Policy GS5 of the East Hampshire District Local Plan: First Review. 

4. (R12C) Adequate provision cannot be made within land shown to be controlled by the applicant 

for the parking of vehicles clear of the highway for number 13 Finchdean Road in accordance 

with the adopted standards of the Planning Authority to the detriment of highway safety and the 

danger and inconvenience of other highway users. The proposal would therefore conflict with 

policies GS5 and T-6 of the East Hampshire District Local Plan: First Review.

5. (UNQ1) Further residential development in this location will add to surface water drainage 

problems in the area contrary to Policy GS5 of the East Hampshire District Local Plan: First 

Review. 

6. (R2R) No provision has been made for public open space within the proposal contrary to Policy 

RT3 of the East Hampshire District Local Plan: First Review. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 002 

PROPOSAL: SINGLE STOREY ANNEXE AND SINGLE STOREY LOUNGE EXTENSION 

LOCATION: 1 Lyne Place, Waterlooville, Hampshire, PO8 9TP 

REFERENCE NO. F.29069/001/FUL/PB PARISH: Horndean 

APPLICANT: Mr & Mrs Meredith 

CASE OFFICER: Paul Bowman DATE REGISTERED: 03/07/2002 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

REFUSED for the following reason: 

1. (R4O) In the opinion of the Planning Authority the proposal constitutes an overdevelopment of 

this rear garden site where the form and mass of development is tantamount to a new dwelling 

creating an unacceptable loss of amenity space and cramped form of development in this 

location to the detriment of the character and appearance of the streetscene, contrary to General 

Strategy Policy GS5 of the East Hampshire District Local Plan: First Review and the adopted 

Supplementary Planning Guidance contained within the Planning Authority's Design Guide for 

Residential Extensions. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 003 

PROPOSAL: REMOVAL OF CONDITION NO. 2 OF F.28417/008 (AGRICULTURAL 

OCCUPANCY) 

LOCATION: Moss Cottage, Hill House Hill, Liphook, Hampshire, GU307PX 

REFERENCE NO. F.28417/018/FUL/JM PARISH: Bramshott/Liphook 

APPLICANT: Gates Nursery 

CASE OFFICER: Julia Mansi DATE REGISTERED: 02/07/2002 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


2

1. (R1L) The dwelling on this site was only permitted, against the normal policies of restraint which 

cover the countryside, as an agricultural exception. Without such justification the dwelling would 

not have been permitted, therefore the current proposal would result in an undesirable 

intensification of the existing scattered or loose knit form of development in this rural area to the 

detriment of the locality contrary to the Countryside Policies of the Hampshire County Structure 

Plan (particularly Policies C1 & C2) and the General Strategy, Environment and Housing Policies 

of the East Hampshire District Local Plan: First Review (particularly PoliciesGS2, GS5 & H12) 

2. (R2F) The dwelling on this site was only permitted, against the normal policies of restraint which 

cover the countryside, as an agricultural exception. Without such justification the dwelling would 

not have been permitted, therefore the current constitutes an unacceptable intrusion of 

development into the countryside to the detriment of the character of this Area of Special 

Landscape Quality contrary to Policies C1 & C2 of the Hampshire County Structure Plan 1996- 

2011 (Review) (particularly Policies E6) and the General Strategy and Environment Policies of 

the East Hampshire District Local Plan: First Review (particularly Policies GS5 & ENV2). 

3. (UNQ1) The dwelling on this site was only permitted, against the normal policies of restraint which 

cover the countryside, as an agricultural exception. From the information submitted, insufficient 

justification has been made for the lifting of the agricultural occupancy condition and allowing a 

dwelling in the countryside contrary the Policies set out above. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 004 

PROPOSAL: TWO STOREY BUILDING COMPRISING FOUR ONE BEDROOM FLATS AT 

FIRST FLOOR AND CAR PARKING AT GROUND FLOOR 

LOCATION: Harris Court, Station Road, Liphook, Hampshire, GU307XX 

REFERENCE NO. F.28827/003/FUL/JM PARISH: Bramshott/Liphook 

APPLICANT: Zand Co Ltd 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


1. (R4S) In the opinion of the Planning Authority the proposal constitutes an unacceptable form of 

development involving an excessive number of flats for this site such that the resultant 

development would not be compatible with that adjoining and be out of character with this 

residential location. The proposal would have a materially adverse affect on the amenity of 

existing properties and on-site parking provision. The proposal would be contrary to Policies 

UB3 and H5 of the Hampshire County Structure Plan and General Strategy Policy GS5 of the 

East Hampshire District Local Plan: First Review. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

3

Item No. 005 

PROPOSAL: TWO STOREY SIDE EXTENSION (AS AMENDED BY PLANS RECEIVED 

26 JULY 2002) 

LOCATION: 2 New Road, Clanfield, Waterlooville, Hampshire, PO8 0NS 

REFERENCE NO. F.37367/FUL/PB PARISH: Clanfield 

APPLICANT: Mr B Bridgman 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

PERMISSION subject to the following conditions: 

1. (ST5) The development hereby permitted shall be begun within five years from the date of this 

permission. 

Reason To comply with the provision of Section 91(1) of the Town and Country Planning Act, 

1990. 

2. (E2) Before development commences on site details of all external facing and roofing 

materials shall have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority. 

Reason To ensure that the materials used in the construction of the development harmonise 

with its surroundings. 

3. (E3) The external facing materials more specifically the new guttering, window and glazing bars 

shall match, as closely as possible, in type, colour and texture those of the existing building. 

Reason To ensure that a harmonious visual relationship is achieved between the new and the 

existing developments. 

4. (D11) Notwithstanding the provisions of Part 1 of Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning 

(General Permitted Development) Order, 1995 (or any Order revoking and re-enacting that 

Order) no window(s) or door(s) shall at any time be inserted in the northern side elevation of the 

two-storey side extension hereby permitted without the prior written consent of the Planning 

Authority. 

Reason To protect the privacy of the occupants of the adjoining residential property 

(properties). 

Informative Notes to Applicant: 

1. The applicant is advised to check the alignment of any sewer or waste water outfall which may lie 

in the vicinity of the proposed work and contact the local regulator should this cause an 

obstruction or require diverting. 

2. The applicant is advised of his obligations under The Party Wall Act 1996 should any part of the 

proposed work or excavations come into contact with or affect the adjoining neighbours garage. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

4

Item No. 006 

PROPOSAL: SINGLE STOREY EXTENSION 

LOCATION: The Old Barn, Hawkley, Liss, Hampshire, GU336LU 

REFERENCE NO. F.29722/020/FUL/PB PARISH: Hawkley 

APPLICANT: Mr & Mrs J. Buckle 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 

2. (E3) The external materials to be used (including window frames and guttering) shall be executed 

with brick, stone, stained weatherboarding and slate to match, as closely as possible, in type, 

colour and texture those of the existing building. 



________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 007 

PROPOSAL: PORCH TO FRONT 

LOCATION: 35 London Road, Horndean, Waterlooville, Hampshire, PO8 0BN 

REFERENCE NO. F.37439/FUL/PB PARISH: Horndean 

APPLICANT: Mr R W Bazeley 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 





________________________________________________________________________ 

5

Item No. 008 

PROPOSAL: EXTENSION TO AGRICULTURAL BUILDING FOR HOUSING LIVESTOCK 

LOCATION: Barrow Hill Farm, Ramsdean, Petersfield, Hampshire, GU321RW 

REFERENCE NO. F.23500/003/FUL/NP PARISH: Langrish 

APPLICANT: Mr G Luff 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 





3. (A2) The building hereby permitted shall be used only for agricultural purposes as defined in 

Section 336(1) of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1990 and if at any time the building 

ceases to be used or required for such purpose it shall be removed and the site re-instated to the 

satisfaction of the Planning Authority. 

Reason To ensure that the building is used for agricultural purposes only since it lies within a 

rural area to which restrictive planning policies apply and where only that development needed to 

meet the essential requirements of the locality is normally permitted. 


1. You are advised that to meet the requirements of the Principal Landscape Officer the roofing 

materials should match those used on the adjacent agricultural buildings. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

6

Item No. 009 

PROPOSAL: LOFT CONVERSION WITH DORMER WINDOWS, INSTALLATION OF 

CHIMNEY STACK TO GROUND FLOOR AND DETACHED GARAGE 

LOCATION: Slade Stables, High Cross, Froxfield, Petersfield, Hampshire, GU321EB 

REFERENCE NO. F.29782/011/FUL/JR PARISH: Froxfield 

APPLICANT: Mr D Brooks 

CASE OFFICER: Joanne Riley DATE REGISTERED: 03/07/2002 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


1. (UNQ1) The site lies in a rural area designated as an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty where it 

is essential to retain the character of the area. The proposed location of the garage, owing to its 

detachment from the house and location within an attractive open part of the site, would lead to 

an intensified pattern of development which would harm the rural character of this group of 

buildings, contrary to Policies GS5 and ENV1 of the East Hampshire District Local Plan: First 

Review. 


1. The applicants are advised to consider a different location closer to the house for the garage, and 

are advised that there are no objections to the plans for dormer windows and chimney. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 010 

PROPOSAL: SINGLE STOREY SIDE EXTENSION AND PORCH TO FRONT 

LOCATION: 12 St. Hilda Avenue, Waterlooville, Hampshire, PO8 0JF 


APPLICANT: Mr J Cole 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 

2. (E3) The external materials to be used shall match, as closely as possible, in type, colour and 

texture those of the existing building. 



7




________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 011 

PROPOSAL: SINGLE STOREY REAR EXTENSION AND FIRST FLOOR EXTENSION 

OVER EXISTING GARAGE (AS AMENDED BY PLANS RECEIVED 17TH 

JULY 2002) 

LOCATION: Rendle Dell, 19 Highfield Gardens, Liss, Hampshire, GU337NQ 

REFERENCE NO. F.37394/FUL/JR PARISH: Liss 

APPLICANT: Mr & Mrs T Garner 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 





________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 012 

PROPOSAL: CONSERVATORY TO REAR 

LOCATION: 35 Oaklands Road, Petersfield, Hampshire, GU322EY 

REFERENCE NO. F.37410/FUL/PB PARISH: Petersfield 

APPLICANT: Mr & Mrs Girdlestone 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 

8

2. (E3) The external facing brick to be used shall match, as closely as possible, in type, colour and 







_______________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 013 

PROPOSAL: SATELLITE DISH TO SOUTH ELEVATON 

LOCATION: Proteus Software, 4 Hillbrow House Linden Drive, Liss, Hampshire, GU337RJ 


APPLICANT: Mr V J Conner 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 

2. (E3) The external materials to be used shall be black. 

Reason To ensure the dish is less conspicuous in the street scene. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 014 

PROPOSAL: FENCE TO SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF PROPERTY 

LOCATION: 54 Princes Road, Petersfield, Hampshire, GU323BH 

REFERENCE NO. F.35325/001/FUL/JR PARISH: Petersfield 

APPLICANT: Mrs Beale & Mr Taylor 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


9


permission. 


1990. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 015 

PROPOSAL: CONSERVATORY TO REAR 

LOCATION: 1 Shear Hill, Petersfield, Hampshire, GU314BB 

REFERENCE NO. F.20703/003/FUL/JR PARISH: Petersfield 

APPLICANT: Mrs Mallows 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

PERMISSION subject to the following condition: 


permission. 


1990. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 016 

PROPOSAL: SINGLE STOREY FRONT AND SIDE EXTENSION 

LOCATION: 14 Five Heads Road, Waterlooville, Hampshire, PO8 9NW 


APPLICANT: Mr & Mrs Herbertson 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 





________________________________________________________________________ 

10

Item No. 017 

PROPOSAL: RETENTION OF SATELLITE DISH 

LOCATION: Co-operative Store, 64 Headley Road, Liphook, Hampshire, GU307NP 

REFERENCE NO. F.27589/008/FUL/PB PARISH: Bramshott/Liphook 

APPLICANT: Co-operative Bank 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

PERMISSION 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 018 

PROPOSAL: CONSERVATORY TO REAR, DETACHED TRIPLE GARAGE AND 

CONVERSION OF EXISTING GARAGE TO ANCILLARY 

ACCOMMODATION 

LOCATION: The Dragon House, Stodham Lane, Liss, Hampshire, GU337QZ 

REFERENCE NO. F.23793/005/FUL/SM PARISH: Steep 

APPLICANT: Mr & Mrs E Housden 

CASE OFFICER: Sarah Marr DATE REGISTERED: 27/05/2002 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


1. (UNQ1) In addition to the enlargement when the replacement dwelling was completed, this 

proposal would represent an overlarge cumulative extension of the original property and is 

considered to be contrary to Policy H16 of the East Hampshire District Local Plan: First Review. 

2. (R5G) The proposed garage represents a development which is unacceptable given its size and 

bulk and is considered to be detriment to the character of the property and surrounding area 

contrary to General Strategy Policy GS5 of the East Hampshire District Local Plan: First Review. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

11

Item No. 019 

PROPOSAL: FIRST FLOOR PITCHED ROOF DORMER TO THE REAR (AS AMENDED 

BY PLANS RECEIVED 6/8/2002) 

LOCATION: 28 Pulens Crescent, Petersfield, Hampshire, GU314DH 

REFERENCE NO. F.28025/001/FUL/SM PARISH: Petersfield 

APPLICANT: Mr and Mrs A Beevers 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 

2. (ST8) The development hereby permitted shall be completed in accordance with the approved 

plans and specifications. Any variation or departure from the approved plans will require the 

prior approval of the Planning Authority before works commence. 

Reason To ensure that the development hereby authorised is satisfactorily undertaken in the 

interests of the amenity of the area. 







Order) no window(s) or door(s) shall at any time be inserted in the side elevations of the 

extension hereby permitted without the prior written consent of the Planning Authority. 

Reason To protect the privacy of the occupants of the adjoining residential properties. 

5. (UNQ1) The window in the rear elevation of the extension herby permitted shall not at any time, 

be replaced by a door. 

Reason In the interest of the amenity of the neighbouring properties. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

12

Item No. 020 

PROPOSAL: CERTIFICATE OF LAWFULNESS FOR EXISTING USE - OCCUPATION AS 

A SEPARATE DWELLING FROM HEWSHOTT HOUSE 

LOCATION: Weydown, Hewshott Lane, Liphook, Hampshire, GU307SU 

REFERENCE NO. F.20975/006/CLUX/PE PARISH: Bramshott/Liphook 

APPLICANT: Mr & Mrs Abbott 

CASE OFFICER: Peter Eggleton DATE REGISTERED: 31/05/2002 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

CERTIFICATE OF LAWFULNESS - PERMITTED 

1. (UNQ1) From the evidence submitted is appears that the property is currently occupied as an 

independent dwelling and has been occupied for that purpose in excess of 4 years. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 021 

PROPOSAL: CERTIFICATE OF LAWFULNESS FOR EXISTING USE - OCCUPATION AS 

A DWELLING WITHOUT AN AGRICULTURAL OCCUPANCY 

RESTRICTION (BREACH OF CONDITION 2 OF PRD 102/1) 

LOCATION: The Bothy, Hewshott Lane, Liphook, Hampshire, GU307SU 

REFERENCE NO. F.20975/007/CLUX/PE PARISH: Bramshott/Liphook 

APPLICANT: Mr & Mrs Abbott 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

CERTIFICATE OF LAWFULNESS - REFUSED 

1. (UNQ1) The applicant has failed to demonstrate that the current occupier, nor all the occupants of 

the last 10 years, have not been employed or last employed in agriculture. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

13

Item No. 022 

PROPOSAL: OUTLINE - FOUR BEDROOMED, SINGLE STOREY DWELLING WITH 

DOUBLE GARAGE (VARIATION OF CONDITION OF F27726/003 - TO 

EXTEND TIMESCALE FOR SUBMISSION OF RESERVED MATTERS) 

LOCATION: 29 Finchdean Road, Rowland's Castle, Hampshire, PO9 6DA 

REFERENCE NO. F.27726/004/OUT/SM PARISH: Rowlands Castle 

APPLICANT: Greengage Projects Ltd 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


1. (ST1) Applications for the approval of the matters referred to herein shall be made within a period 

of three years from the date of this permission. The development to which the permission relates 

shall be begun not later than whichever is the later of the following dates:- 

(i) five years from the date of this permission; or 

(ii) two years from the final approval of the said reserved matters, or, in the case of 

approval on different dates, the final approval of the last such matter to be approved. 

Reason To comply with the provisions of Section 92(2) of the Town and Country Planning Act, 

1990 

2. (UNQ1) During Construction, any facilities for the storage of oils, fuels or chemicals shall be sited 

on impervious base and surrounded by impervious bund walls. The volume of the bunded 

compound should be at least equivalent to the capacity of the tank plus 10%. If there is multiple 

tankage, the compound should be at least equivalent to the capacity of the largest tank, or the 

combined capacity of interconnected tanks, plus 10%. All filling points, vents, gauges and sight 

glasses shall be located within the bund. The drainage system of the bund shall be sealed with 

no discharge to any watercourse, land or underground strata. Associated pipework should be 

located above ground and protected from accidental damage. All filling points and tank overflow 

pipe outlets should be detailed to discharge downwards into the bund. This should be removed 

and the ground returned to its original condition once the development is occupied. 

Reason To prevent pollution to the water environment 


1. The conditions on F27726/003/OUT remain in place and the applicant should consider these 

when submitting any further application. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

14

Item No. 023 

PROPOSAL: CONSERVATORY TO SIDE AFTER DEMOLITION OF EXISTING (AS 

AMENDED BY PLANS RECEIVED 22/08/02) 

LOCATION: 2 Hillview Conford, Liphook, Hampshire, GU307QW 

REFERENCE NO. F.26812/001/FUL/JR PARISH: Bramshott/Liphook 

APPLICANT: Mr & Mrs Woodward 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 024 

PROPOSAL: OUTLINE - TWO PAIRS OF SEMI-DETACHED DWELLINGS, 1 DETACHED 

DWELLING AND GARAGES 

LOCATION: 85 and land to the rear of 83 and 85 Catherington Lane, Catherington, 

Waterlooville, Hampshire, PO8 

REFERENCE NO. F.25122/015/OUT/NP PARISH: Horndean 

APPLICANT: Mrs J Chaffer, Mr & Mrs N Chaffer & Mr K Chaffer 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

WITHDRAWN for the following reason: 

1. (UNQ1) Withdrawn at the applicants' request pending further studies and the submission of an 

amended scheme. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

15

Item No. 025 

PROPOSAL: TWO STOREY SIDE AND SINGLE STOREY FRONT EXTENSIONS 

LOCATION: 21 Greenfield Close, Liphook, Hampshire, GU307QF 

REFERENCE NO. F.31945/002/FUL/JR PARISH: Bramshott/Liphook 

APPLICANT: Mr P Lovewell 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 

2. (L12) The beech trees, shown on the approved plan for retention, shall be protected during 

construction works, and there shall be no alteration of ground levels or storage of building 

materials under the tree. 

Reason To safeguard the existing tree in the interests of the visual amenity of the locality. 






1. The applicants are advised to note that during his site visit, the Councils Arboricultural Consultant 

noted the presence of Cryptococcus colonies which can lead to Beech bark disease. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 026 


LOCATION: 15 Queens Road, Petersfield, Hampshire, GU323BB 

REFERENCE NO. F.37287/FUL/PB PARISH: Petersfield 

APPLICANT: Mr Mark David Tupper 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


16

1. (R5I) The proposed rear extension taken at 4.2 metres depth would result in excessive building 

bulk abutting the boundary creating an unneighbourly form of development detrimental to the 

outlook and amenities of adjoining residents contrary to the General Strategy Policy GS5 of the 

East Hampshire District Local Plan: First Review and the adopted Design Guide for Residential 

Extensions. 


1. The applicant is advised that the submitted plans show inaccuracies in that there is a disparity 

between the plans and measurements shown on the boundary. 

2. The principle of a rear extension in this location is acceptable. The applicant is advised that a 

fresh application is likely to receive more favourable consideration with a formal written 

agreement from the adjoining neighbour regarding the construction of the neighbours 

conservatory on this Party Boundary. The applicant is advised to speak to a Planning Officer 

prior to any resubmission. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 027 

PROPOSAL: TRIPLE GARAGE WITH STORAGE OVER 

LOCATION: Boland Springs, Hewshott Lane, Liphook, Hampshire, GU307SU 

REFERENCE NO. F.34693/002/FUL/SM PARISH: Bramshott/Liphook 

APPLICANT: Mr and Mrs M Redrupp 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


1. (R5G) The proposal represents the unacceptable development of this site to the detriment of the 

character and appearance of the area contrary to General Strategy Policy GS5 of the East 

Hampshire District Local Plan: First Review. 

2. (R10A) The application site lies within a designated Conservation Area and in the opinion of the 

Planning Authority the proposal would detract from the character thereof by reason of size, bulk 

and relationship to existing structures and would be contrary to the General Strategy (GS5) and 

Environment Policies (ENV15 - ENV19) of the East Hampshire District Local Plan: First Review. 

3. (R2F) The proposal constitutes an unacceptable intrusion of development into the countryside to 

the detriment of the character of this Area of Special Landscape Quality contrary to Policies C1- 

C3 of the Hampshire County Structure Plan 1996-2011 (Review) (particularly Policies C1 and 

C2) and the General Strategy and Environment Policies of the East Hampshire District Local 

Plan: First Review (particularly Policies ENV2). 

4. (UNQ1) The proposed accommodation is excessive for domestic purposes and has the potential 

for residential use and is potentially contrary to Policies C1 and C2 of Hampshire Country 

Structure Plan 1996-2011 (Review) and GS2, GS3 and GS5 of East Hampshire District Local 

Plan: First Review 

17

5. (UNQ2) The proposal represents the over provision of off-street car parking contrary to PPG3 and 

PPG 13. This does not reflect the emphasis on securing sustainable residential environments 

where car usage is minimised. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 028 

PROPOSAL: TWO STOREY SIDE EXTENSION AND SINGLE STOREY REAR 

EXTENSION 

LOCATION: 48 Five Heads Road, Waterlooville, Hampshire, PO8 9NU 


APPLICANT: Mr A Parffett 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 







Order) no window(s) or door(s) shall at any time be inserted in the side elevation of the dwelling 

hereby permitted without the prior written consent of the Planning Authority. 


(properties). 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 029 

PROPOSAL: CONSERVATORY TO SIDE 

LOCATION: 20 College Close, Rowland's Castle, Hampshire, PO9 6AJ 

REFERENCE NO. F.37403/FUL/PB PARISH: Rowlands Castle 

APPLICANT: Mr & Mrs Leonard 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

NOT PROCEEDED WITH for the following reason: 

18

1. (UNQ1) This application is Permitted Development under Part 1, Class A of the Town and 

Country (General Permitted Development) Order 1995. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 030 

PROPOSAL: TWO STOREY EXTENSION WITH CONSERVATORY AND THREE 

DORMERS WINDOWS TO SOUTH ELEVATION 

LOCATION: 18 St. Vincent Crescent, Waterlooville, Hampshire, PO8 9JD 

REFERENCE NO. F.37300/FUL/JR PARISH: Horndean 

APPLICANT: Mr R Wells 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 





________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 031 

PROPOSAL: WOOD STORE TO EXISTING GARAGE 

LOCATION: Lingfield, Hill House Hill, Liphook, Hampshire, GU307PX 

REFERENCE NO. F.25523/006/FUL/PB PARISH: Bramshott/Liphook 

APPLICANT: Mr E Jenner 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 

19


texture those of the existing detached garage. 





Order) no window(s) or door(s) shall at any time be inserted in the wood store extension hereby 

permitted without the prior written consent of the Planning Authority. 

Reason In the interests of the visual amenities of the streetscene and character of the area 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 032 

PROPOSAL: BAY WINDOW TO KITCHEN, REPLACEMENT LOBBY AND W/C TO 

FRONT FOLLOWING DEMOLITION OF EXISTING 

LOCATION: Alexanders Farmhouse, Alexanders Lane, Privett, Alton, Hampshire, 

GU343PW 

REFERENCE NO. F.29167/016/FUL/JR PARISH: Froxfield 

APPLICANT: Mr & Mrs F Robinson 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 






1. The applicant is advised that because this dwelling lies in a rural area where restrictive planning 

policies apply and where new development is not normally permitted the Planning Authority are 

unlikely to favour any further proposals to enlarge the premises. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

20

Item No. 033 

PROPOSAL: DETACHED DWELLING TO REAR AFTER DEMOLITION OF GARAGE 

AND SHED 

LOCATION: 20 Pulens Lane, Petersfield, Hampshire, GU314DB 

REFERENCE NO. F.37435/FUL/SM PARISH: Petersfield 

APPLICANT: Mr J Sutton 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


1. (R4H) The proposal represents the unacceptable sub-division of an existing residential curtilage 

giving rise to an unsatisfactory plot size resulting in a cramped and confined development 

inappropriate to the character and appearance of the locality and the amenity of the occupiers of 

adjacent dwellings contrary to Policies UB3 and H5 of the Hampshire County Structure Plan 

1996-2011 (Review) and General Strategy Policy GS5 of the East Hampshire District Local Plan: 

First Review. 

2. (R4O) In the opinion of the Planning Authority the proposal constitutes an unacceptable 

overdevelopment of the site where the form and mass of development is at variance with that of 

the immediately adjoining properties, which in general provide the essential character of the area 

and where the form and content of the development provides inadequate amenity space for 

potential residents, contrary to Policies UB3 and H5 of the Hampshire County Structure Plan and 

General Strategy Policy GS5 of the East Hampshire District Local Plan: First Review. 



________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 034 

PROPOSAL: EXTERNAL AIR-CONDITIONING CONDENSER UNIT TO REAR (AS 

AMENDED BY ACOUSTIC ENCLOSURE DETAILS RECEIVED 30/8/02) 

LOCATION: Buriton Stores and Post Office, 48A High Street, Buriton, Petersfield, 

Hampshire, GU315RX 

REFERENCE NO. F.30116/011/FUL/JM PARISH: Buriton 

APPLICANT: Buriton Village Shop Association Ltd 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


21


permission. 


1990. 

2. (UNQ1) Before development commences, details of the finished colour of the acoustic housing 

shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Authority. The acoustic housing shall be 

painted the agreed colour before the unit is brought into use and maintained as such thereafter. 

Reason In the interests of the visual amenity of the setting of the listed building and the 

Conservation Area. 

3. (T2) This permission shall be restricted to a limited period expiring on 31/08/04 when the air 

conditioning unit and acoustic housing hereby permitted shall be removed from the site unless a 

further permission is granted in writing by the Planning Authority. 

Reason The shop use permission on this site is only temporary and the unit should be removed 

once that temporary permission expires. 

4. (UNQ2) The air conditioning equipment hereby permitted not to be used until such time as the 

acoustic enclosure is on site and in place around the equipment. 

Reason In the interest of the amenity of neighbouring properties 

5. (UNQ3) The acoustic enclosure shall be retained in position on site at all times and maintained in 

a manner which ensures that its acoustic properties are maintained at the same level. Should the 

enclosure deteriorate, it should be replaced like with like. Any replacement enclosure, not of the 

same construction and design, details must be passed to the Planning Authority for approval, 

prior to installation. 

Reason In the interest of the amenity of neighbouring properties 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 035 

PROPOSAL: SINGLE STOREY REAR EXTENSION AFTER DEMOLITION OF 

CONSERVATORY AND TWO STOREY SIDE EXTENSION 

LOCATION: Rookery Farm House, Ramsdean, Petersfield, Hampshire, GU321RU 

REFERENCE NO. F.26481/002/FUL/PB PARISH: Langrish 

APPLICANT: Mr G Berkeley 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 





22

3. (D22) The existing detached garage shown hatched in red on the plans hereby approved shall be 

used for the parking of private motor vehicles and ancillary domestic storage only and for no 

other purpose, in accordance with the applicant's agent's facsimile letter dated 5/9/02. 

Reason To maintain planning control in the interests of amenity. 


1. The applicant is advised that because this dwelling lies in a rural area where restrictive planning 

policies apply and where new development is not normally permitted the Planning Authority are 

unlikely to favour any further proposals to enlarge the premises. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 036 

PROPOSAL: TWO SINGLE STOREY REAR EXTENSIONS 

LOCATION: Co-operative Store, 64 Headley Road, Liphook, Hampshire, GU307NP 

REFERENCE NO. F.27589/009/FUL/SM PARISH: Bramshott/Liphook 

APPLICANT: Southern Co-op Ltd 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 










4. (UNQ1) Before development commences a report shall be submitted showing that the existing 

drainage on site is adequate and appropriate for the use intended. This shall be submitted to 

and approved in writing by the local planning department and any measurers to overcome any 

evident problems should be implemented before the development commences. 

Reason In the interest of the amenity of the neighbouring property and to ensure that the drains 

are capable of coping with additional toilet facilities. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

23

Item No. 037 

PROPOSAL: CHANGE OF USE FROM DWELLING AND SHOP TO TWO DWELLINGS 

LOCATION: 22 The Green, Rowland's Castle, Hampshire, PO9 6AB 

REFERENCE NO. F.24705/015/FUL/SM PARISH: Rowlands Castle 

APPLICANT: Mr & Mrs R G Day 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


1. (R9A) The premises occupy a prominent position within the core of this attractive village. 

Currently it comprises a retail unit and its change of use to a non-retail use would result in the 

loss of a valuable retail unit. No evidence has been submitted to show what efforts have been 

made to let or sell the premises as a shop. In the opinion of the Planning Authority the proposal 

would detract from the attractiveness, vitality and viability of Rowlands Castle and its 

Conservation Area contrary to Policies S5 and ENV18 of the East Hampshire District Local Plan: 

First Review. 




1. The contents of your letter of 26 August have been noted. However, no evidence has been 

submitted to show that the current unit is not viable for retail purposes (within Class A1 of the 

Use Classes Order). This evidence should include a marketing report for a period of no less than 

six months showing that the unit was put on the market at a reasonable price for letting or for 

sale. This should also include the level of interest in the property and why perspective 

purchasers/lets have chosen not to take on the unit. Once this report has been completed, it is 

suggested that you arrange to meet a Planning Officer to discuss any future planning 

applications. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 038 

PROPOSAL: CONSERVATORY TO SIDE AND REAR 

LOCATION: 3 Longacre Close, Liss, Hampshire, GU337UZ 


APPLICANT: Mr & Mrs O'Connor 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


24


permission. 


1990. 

2. (E3) The external materials to be used on the brick plinth shall match, as closely as possible, in 

type, colour and texture those of the existing building. 



________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 039 


LOCATION: 4 Ryefield Close, Petersfield, Hampshire, GU314RA 

REFERENCE NO. F.37441/FUL/JR PARISH: Petersfield 

APPLICANT: D Coombes 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 





________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 040 

PROPOSAL: REAR AND SIDE DORMER WINDOWS (AS AMENDED BY LETTER 

RECEIVED 8.8.02) 

LOCATION: 6 St. Marys Road, Liss, Hampshire, GU337AH 


APPLICANT: Mr & Mrs O Mackrell 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


25


permission. 


1990. 





________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 041 

PROPOSAL: DETACHED GARAGE 

LOCATION: Greatham Moor, Greatham, Liss, Hampshire, GU336HE 

REFERENCE NO. F.33054/007/FUL/JR PARISH: Greatham 

APPLICANT: Mr & Mrs K Ellis 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 






3. (D21) The building hereby permitted shall be used only for purposes incidental to the enjoyment 

of the dwelling house and for no other purpose including business, residential, commercial or 

industrial purposes. 

Reason It is considered that the building is unsuitable because of its location for such uses. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

26

Item No. 042 

PROPOSAL: FIRST FLOOR FRONT EXTENSION AND NEW PORCH 

LOCATION: 1 Rowan Tree Close, Liss, Hampshire, GU337JU 

REFERENCE NO. F.23744/001/FUL/PB PARISH: Liss 

APPLICANT: Mr & Mrs Moore 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 







Order) no window(s) or other openings shall at any time be inserted in the first floor north 

elevation of the front extension hereby permitted without the prior written consent of the Planning 

Authority. 


(properties). 


1. The applicant is advised that:- 

a) this planning permission does not confer consent for the existing flat roof single storey rear 

extension at the property, for which a retrospective application will be required to regularise the 

development; and 

b) any further extension or alterations to the property will require planning permission. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

27

Item No. 043 

PROPOSAL: GARDEN SHED/WORKSHOP TO REAR 

LOCATION: 52 Patricks Copse Road, Liss, Hampshire, GU337DW 


APPLICANT: Mr R B Hutchins 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 


of the dwelling house and for no other purpose including business, commercial or industrial 

purposes. 

Reason It is considered that the building is unsuitable because of its position for such uses. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 044 

PROPOSAL: SINGLE STOREY REAR LOBBY 

LOCATION: Gledswood Cottage, Hill Brow Road, Hill Brow, Liss, Hampshire, GU337PX 

REFERENCE NO. F.26356/006/FUL/JR PARISH: Liss 

APPLICANT: Mr and Mrs J Irwin 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 





________________________________________________________________________ 

28

Item No. 045 

PROPOSAL: ALTERATIONS AND INCREASE IN ROOF HEIGHT BY 0.5 METRES TO 

FORM ACCOMMODATION IN ROOF WITH BALCONY TO FRONT, SIDE 

AND REAR EXTENSION TO INCLUDE GARAGE (AMENDED 

DESCRIPTION) 

LOCATION: 1 Rowlands Castle Road, Horndean, Waterlooville, Hampshire, PO8 0DF 


APPLICANT: Mr P. Parnell 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 





________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 046 

PROPOSAL: SINGLE STOREY REAR EXTENSION 

LOCATION: 27 Gloucester Close, Petersfield, Hampshire, GU323AX 


APPLICANT: Mr and Mrs J Marriner 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


1. (UNQ1) The proposed rear extension taken at 5.3 metres depth would result in excessive building 

bulk abutting the boundary creating an unneighbourly form of development detrimental to the 

outlook and amenities of adjoining residents contrary to the General Strategy Policy GS5 of the 

East Hampshire District Local Plan: First Review and the adopted Design Guide for Residential 

Extensions. 


1. You are advised to contact the case officer to discuss the submission of a reduced scheme. 

29

Item No. 047 

PROPOSAL: TWO STOREY SIDE EXTENSION WITH DORMER WINDOWS FRONT AND 

REAR AND SINGLE STOREY REAR EXTENSION AFTER DEMOLITION OF 

EXISTING CONSERVATORY 

LOCATION: 14 The Curve, Waterlooville, Hampshire, PO8 9SE 

REFERENCE NO. F.37420/FUL/JR PARISH: Horndean 

APPLICANT: Mr A Newell 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 






of the dwelling house and for no other purpose including business, commercial or industrial, 

residential, purposes. 

Reason It is considered that the building is unsuitable because of its location for such uses. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 048 

PROPOSAL: FIRST FLOOR EXTENSION TO SIDE 

LOCATION: 19 Briar Close, Waterlooville, Hampshire, PO8 9ED 

REFERENCE NO. F.33190/001/FUL/JR PARISH: Horndean 

APPLICANT: Mr and Mrs D Eaton 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 

30







Order) no windows shall at any time be inserted in the north elevation of the extension hereby 

permitted without the prior written consent of the Planning Authority. 


(properties). 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 049 

PROPOSAL: DISPLAY OF NON-ILLUMINATED FASCIA SIGN AND NON-ILLUMINATED 

PROJECTING SIGN 

LOCATION: 11 Rams Walk, Petersfield, Hampshire, GU323JA 

REFERENCE NO. F.37461/ADV/JR PARISH: Petersfield 

APPLICANT: The Jessop Group 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

CONSENT subject to the following condition: 






________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 050 

PROPOSAL: TWO STOREY SIDE EXTENSION 

LOCATION: Forestfield Cottage, Froxfield, Petersfield, Hampshire, GU321DG 

REFERENCE NO. F.32925/003/FUL/PB PARISH: Froxfield 

APPLICANT: Mr Barker 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


31


permission. 


1990. 






3. (C25) All leadwork shall be carried out in accordance with the Lead Development Association's 

Code of Practice. 

Reason To ensure treatment is appropriate to the fabric of the dwelling. 

4. (C15) The new works shall be executed in brick, mortar, flintwork, roof thatch and timber window 

frames to match the existing building, details of such materials shall be submitted to and 

approved by the Planning Authority before works commence. 

Reason To ensure that the materials to be used are appropriate in order to maintain the 

architectural interest of the building. 


1. The applicant is advised that the grant of this permission represents the optimum size of the 

premises and that any further enlargement would constitute an unacceptable over-development 

or intensification of building mass or use and the Planning Authority is not likely to permit any 

further proposals to enlarge the premises. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 051 

PROPOSAL: TWO STOREY SIDE EXTENSION 

LOCATION: 64 Bulls Copse Lane, Waterlooville, Hampshire, PO8 9RA 


APPLICANT: Mrs H Kabir 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


1. (R5J) The proposal by virtue of its excessive ridge height and length is of poor design that 

represents an unacceptable enlargement which dominates the existing dwelling to the detriment 

of the character and appearance of the streetscene and the visual amenities of the surrounding 

area contrary to General Strategy Policy GS5 of the East Hampshire District Local Plan: First 

Review and the adopted East Hampshire District Council Design Guide for Residential 

Extensions. 


32

1. The applicant is advised that the Planning Authority is not opposed to the principle of an 

extension in this location and is advised to speak with a Planning Officer should they wish to 

discuss or explore an alternative proposal. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 052 

PROPOSAL: SINGLE STOREY REAR EXTENSION TO KITCHEN AND COVERED AREA 

LOCATION: Glendale, Hatch Lane, Liss, Hampshire, GU337NJ 

REFERENCE NO. F.26877/003/FUL/PB PARISH: Liss 

APPLICANT: Mr & Mrs Browse 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 





________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 053 

PROPOSAL: SINGLE STOREY FRONT EXTENSION AND PITCHED ROOF OVER 

EXISTING FLAT ROOF 

LOCATION: 105 Green Lane, Clanfield, Waterlooville, Hampshire, PO8 0LG 

REFERENCE NO. F.32003/001/FUL/JR PARISH: Clanfield 

APPLICANT: Mr & Mrs Hadwen 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


1. (UNQ1) The proposal represents the unacceptable enlargement of this bungalow by virtue of the 

forward projection, will break up the existing pattern of frontages, to the detriment of the 

character and appearance of the streetscene, contrary to Policy GS5 of the East Hampshire 

District Local Plan. 


33

1. The applicants are advised that there is no objection to the alteration to the flat roof, and are 

invited to resubmit an application for this element. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 054 

PROPOSAL: RAISED ROOF WITH DORMERS AND SINGLE STOREY SIDE EXTENSION 

LOCATION: 36 Maple Crescent, Waterlooville, Hampshire, PO8 0LP 


APPLICANT: Mr and Mrs K Hazleden 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 





________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 055 

PROPOSAL: TWO STOREY SIDE EXTENSION WITH DORMERS, DETACHED GARAGE 

AND SIDE EXTENSION TO GRANNY ANNEXE 

LOCATION: 275 London Road, Horndean, Waterlooville, Hampshire, PO8 0JE 

REFERENCE NO. F.21227/002/FUL/SM PARISH: Horndean 

APPLICANT: Mr A A Tadevossian & Mrs W A Russell 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


1. (R5G) The proposal represents the unacceptable enlargement of this dwelling to the detriment of 

the character and appearance of the street scene contrary to General Strategy Policy GS5 of the 

East Hampshire District Local Plan: First Review. 

34

2. (R14C) In the opinion of the Planning Authority the proposal, if permitted, would result in 

demonstrable harm to the locality contrary to the policies of the Development Plan and establish 

an undesirable precedent for other similar proposals which would be difficult to resist, the 

cumulative effect of which would be to further erode and detract from the character and 

appearance of the area. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 056 

PROPOSAL: SINGLE STOREY FRONT AND REAR EXTENSIONS AND DEMOLITION OF 

GARAGES (AS AMENDED BY PLANS RECEIVED 4 SEPTEMBER 2002) 

LOCATION: Petersfield Methodist Church, Station Road, Petersfield, Hampshire, 

GU323EB 

REFERENCE NO. F.29985/002/FUL/NP PARISH: Petersfield 

APPLICANT: Petersfield Methodist Church 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 

2. (E1) Before development commences samples of all external facing and roofing materials shall 

have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority. 

Reason To ensure that the materials used in the construction of the approved development 

harmonise with the surroundings. 

3. (H54M) Adequate provision shall be made within the site to enable vehicles using the site to enter 

and leave in a forward gear. 

Reason In the interests of highway safety. 

4. (UNQ1) Before the works hereby approved are commenced, details to a scale of not less than 

1:20 elevations and 1:5 sections of windows and door frames, surround to new entrance, doors 

and all other joinery, shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority, and 

the works shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details. 

Reason To safeguard the special architectural and historic interest of this building and its setting 

in the Conservation Area. 


35

1. The applicant's attention is drawn to the obligations specified in Sections 4, 7 and 8 of the 

Chronically Sick and Disabled Persons Act 1970 as amended in 1976 and by the Disabled 

Persons Act, 1981 and also to British Standards Code of Practice for Access for the disabled to 

Buildings (BS.5810: 1979). Further guidance as to these requirements can be obtained from the 

Director of Social Services, Hampshire County Council, Trafalgar House, The Castle, 

Winchester, Hants SO23 8UJ (01962 841841), in Department of the Environment Development 

Control Policy Note No. 16 entitled "Access for the Disabled", and Department of the 

Environment approved document "Part m" which explains the requirements of "The Building 

Regulations 1991". 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 057 

PROPOSAL: GLASSHOUSE 

LOCATION: Bowyers Nursery, Farnham Road, Liss, Hampshire, GU336LJ 

REFERENCE NO. F.21021/031/FUL/SM PARISH: Steep 

APPLICANT: Tate Bros Ltd 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 






3. (E3) The external materials to be used shall match those detailed in the application form. 

Reason In the interest of visual amenity. 

4. (UNQ1) In the event that this equipment becomes redundant for agricultural purposes, it shall be 

dismantled within three months and all resultant material removed shall be removed from the 

site. The site shall then be returned to its original condition. 

Reason In the interests of the visual amenity of the area. 

5. (UNQ2) Prior to the development commencing, details of the proposed vehicular access and 

parking arrangements and any other hardstanding shall be submitted to and approved in writing 

by the Planning Authority and thereafter implemented. 

Reason To ensure adequate parking and turning facilities within the site. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

36

Item No. 058 

PROPOSAL: OUTLINE - DETACHED DWELLING AFTER DEMOLITION OF EXISTING 

(AS AMENDED BY PLANS RECEIVED 15/7/02 SHOWING ACCESS TO 

REMAIN AS EXISTING) 

LOCATION: Willow Spring, Hewshott Lane, Liphook, Hampshire, GU30 

REFERENCE NO. F.29675/001/OUT/SM PARISH: Bramshott/Liphook 

APPLICANT: Mr and Mrs N Alves 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


1. (R5C) The application site lies within a rural area to which restrictive Planning Policies apply. The 

proposal involves the replacement of the existing dwelling by a new substantial building 90.8 per 

cent bigger which would significantly affect the character and appearance of this rural area. The 

proposal would therefore, represent an over-large replacement of the existing dwelling affecting 

the successful retention of a range of dwellings of varying sizes, in an area where new dwellings 

are not permitted contrary to Policy H15 of the East Hampshire District Local Plan: First Review. 

2. (R14C) In the opinion of the Planning Authority the proposal, if permitted, would result in 

demonstrable harm to the locality contrary to the policies of the Development Plan and establish 

an undesirable precedent for other similar proposals which would be difficult to resist, the 

cumulative effect of which would be to further erode and detract from the character and 

appearance of the area. 

3. (R10A) The application site lies within a designated Conservation Area and in the opinion of the 

Planning Authority the proposal would detract from the character thereof by reason of excessive 

size which would dominate the site and surrounding area and would be contrary to the General 

Strategy (GS5) and Environment Policies (ENV15 - ENV19) of the East Hampshire District Local 

Plan: First Review. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 059 

PROPOSAL: RETENTION OF HARDSTANDING AND FENCE 

LOCATION: 11a Inwood Road, Liss, Hampshire, GU337LZ 

REFERENCE NO. F.35763/002/FUL/JR PARISH: Liss 

APPLICANT: Mr P J Harding 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


37

1. (E2) Details of all fencing materials and woodstain shall have been submitted to and approved in 

writing by the Planning Authority. 



2. (H54D) Before any other operations are commenced the access, including the footway and/or 

verge crossing and the piping of any ditch, shall be strengthened and completed. 

Reason To provide satisfactory access. 


1. The applicant is advised that the relevant consent to drop the kerb should be sought from the 

Area Surveyor, Hampshire County Council, The Old College, College Street, Petersfield, Hants 

GU31 4AG. (Telephone 01730 266411). 

2. The applicants are advised that before the hardstanding is used for vehicular use, the area of 

grass verge (triangular in shape) needs to be made up to vehicular crossover standard. Failure to 

have this work carried out by an approved contractor will result in the occupier committing an 

offence under the Highways Acts 1980, under Sections 131, 133 and 184. In addition should 

public utilities be damaged or should a member of the public fall, the occupiers could find 

themselves facing claims. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 060 

PROPOSAL: EXTENSION AND ALTERATIONS TO PROVIDE IMPROVED RESIDENTIAL 

FACILITIES 

LOCATION: The Privett Centre, Privett, Alton, Hampshire, GU343PE 

REFERENCE NO. F.37380/FUL/SM PARISH: Froxfield 

APPLICANT: The Privett Centre 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


1. (UNQ1) The application has been formally withdrawn by letter (dated 30/8/02) at the request of 

the applicant. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

38

Item No. 061 

PROPOSAL: EXTENSION AND ALTERATIONS TO PROVIDE IMPROVED RESIDENTIAL 

FACILITIES 

LOCATION: The Privett Centre, Privett, Alton, Hampshire, GU343PE 

REFERENCE NO. F.37380/001/LBC/SM PARISH: Froxfield 

APPLICANT: The Privett Centre 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


1. (UNQ1) The application has been formally withdrawn by letter (dated 30/8/02) at the request of 

the applicant. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 062 

PROPOSAL: SINGLE STOREY AND TWO STOREY FRONT AND SIDE EXTENSION 

LOCATION: 21 White Dirt Lane, Waterlooville, Hampshire, PO8 0NB 


APPLICANT: Mr and Mrs M Land 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


1. (R5G) The proposal represents the unacceptable enlargement of this dwelling to the detriment of 

the character and appearance of the street scene and the amenities of adjoining residents 

contrary to General Strategy Policy GS5 of the East Hampshire District Local Plan: First Review. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

39

Item No. 063 

PROPOSAL: REMOVAL OF CONDITION 3 TO F29535/030 (B8 USE) 

LOCATION: Unit K1, Hazleton Industrial Estate, Lakesmere Road, Horndean, 

Waterlooville, Hampshire, PO89JU 

REFERENCE NO. F.29535/047/FUL/NP PARISH: Horndean 

APPLICANT: Mr J Overend 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 

2. (G2) Notwithstanding the changes of use permitted within Part 3 of Schedule 2 of the Town and 

Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995, unit K1 shall be used for 

purposes within Class B1 (c), B2 and B8 of the Town and Country (Use Classes) Order, 1987 

only, and for no other purpose. 

Reason In order to maintain control over future use of the premises in the interests of the 

general amenity of the area and highway safety. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 064 

PROPOSAL: CONVERSION OF ONE DWELLING INTO TWO FLATS 

LOCATION: 4 Charles Street, Petersfield, Hampshire, GU323EH 


APPLICANT: Miss. L. Carp 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 


1. The applicant is advised that flats do not enjoy Permitted Development rights, and any alteration 

or addition is likely to require a planning application to be submitted. 

40

2. Please note that there is a Section 106 Agreement that applies to this permission. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 065 

PROPOSAL: TWO 2 BEDROOM FLATS AND ONE 1 BEDROOM FLAT (AS AMENDED 

BY LETTER AND PLAN RECEIVED 13/8/02) 

LOCATION: North 22 & 24, Station Road, Liss, Hampshire, GU337DT 

REFERENCE NO. F.37389/FUL/JM PARISH: Liss 

APPLICANT: Mr P Eade 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


1. (UNQ1) Withdrawn at applicants request. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 066 

PROPOSAL: CONVERSION OF FORMER COACH HOUSE AND STABLE BUILDING TO 

2 DWELLINGS WITH GARAGING (AS AMENDED BY PLANS RECEIVED 

20/02/2002 AND 25/02/2002). 

LOCATION: The Former Coach House, Westbury House, West Meon, Petersfield, 

Hampshire, GU321HY 

REFERENCE NO. F.36896/FUL/JM PARISH: East Meon 

APPLICANT: PCCK Ltd 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 



permission. 


1990. 






41

3. (L2) A detailed landscape scheme must be submitted to and be approved in writing by the LPA 

before any works on site are commenced. This scheme shall include the following details:- 

a. location, condition and species of all existing trees with a stem diameter of 100mm or greater 

b. position and species of hedgerows and other vegetation to be retained 

c. Planting plans should include schedules of trees and plants, their species, planting sizes, 

numbers and densities 

d. Areas to be turfed or grass seeded 

e. Implementation timetable 

Reason In the interests of the visual amenities of the locality and to enable proper consideration 

to be given to the impact of the proposed development on existing trees. 

4. (L8B) The landscaping scheme shall be implemented in the first planting season following the 

occupation of either of the units or in accordance with a timetable submitted to and approved in 

writing by the Planning Authority. 

Reason In the interests of the visual amenity of the locality. 

5. (E1) Before development commences samples of all external facing and roofing materials shall 

have been submitted to and approved by the Planning Authority. 

Reason To ensure that the materials used in the construction of the approved development 

harmonise with the surroundings. 



Order) no window(s) or door(s) shall at any time be inserted in the building without the prior 

written consent of the Planning Authority. 

Reason To protect the historical integrity of the listed building. 



Order) no extension or alteration to this dwelling shall be made except with the prior written 

consent of the Planning Authority. 

Reason The site lies in a rural area where it is considered that further development on the site 

may be detrimental to the character of the area and the character of the listed building and as 

such be contrary to the adopted policies of the Planning Authority. 

8. (D22) The garages hereby permitted shall be used for the parking of private motor vehicles and 

ancillary domestic storage only and for no other purpose. 

Reason To maintain planning control in the interests of amenity. 

9. (UNQ1) There shall be no insertion in the roof of any part of the building unless agreed in writing 

by the Planning Authority. 

Reason In the interests of visual amenity and to protect the historical integrity and character of 

the listed building. 

10. (H54K) Adequate space shall be provided within the site, for the loading, unloading and parking of 

vehicles to the satisfaction of the Planning Authority. 


11. (UNQ2) Details of all surface materials are to be agreed by the Planning Authority before 

development commences on site and the agreed details shall be carried out before occupation of 

any part of the building, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning Authority. 

Reason To protect the setting of the listed building. 


42

1. Please note that there is a Section 106 Agreement that applies to this permission. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 067 

PROPOSAL: OUTLINE - TWO DETACHED DWELLINGS 

LOCATION: West, 229 Lovedean Lane, Waterlooville, Hampshire, PO8 

REFERENCE NO. F.37197/OUT/PE PARISH: Horndean 

APPLICANT: Mr D Robson and M Jeffries 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

OUTLINE PERMISSION subject to the following conditions: 

1. (ST1) Applications for the approval of the matters referred to herein shall be made within a period 

of three years from the date of this permission. The development to which the permission relates 

shall be begun not later than whichever is the later of the following dates:- 

(i) five years from the date of this permission; or 

(ii) two years from the final approval of the said reserved matters, or, in the case of approval on 

different dates, the final approval of the last such matter to be approved. 

Reason To comply with the provisions of Section 92(2) of the Town and Country Planning Act, 

1990 

2. (ST2) Before any works or development hereby approved is commenced on site details 

relating to the siting, design, external appearance of, the means of access to the development, 

and the landscaping of site shall be submitted to, and approved by the Planning Authority. These 

details shall comprise the 'reserved matters' and shall be submitted within the time constraints 

referred to in condition 1 above before any development is commenced. 

Reason To comply with Article 4 of the Town and Country Planning (General Development 

Procedure) Order 1995 (or any Order revoking and re-enacting that Order). 

3. (H54D) Before any other operations are commenced the access, including the footway and/or 

verge crossing and the piping of any ditch, shall be constructed and lines of sight of 2 metres by 

45 metres provided and maintained at all times. 

Reason To provide satisfactory access. 

4. (H54K) Adequate space shall be provided within the site, for the loading, unloading and parking of 

vehicles to the satisfaction of the Planning Authority. 

Reason In the interests of highway safety.. 

5. (H54O) The access shall be splayed back at an angle of 45 degrees. 


6. (H54N) Any gates provided shall be set back a distance of 4.5m from the edge of the carriageway 

of the adjoining highway. 


________________________________________________________________________ 

43

Item No. 068 

PROPOSAL: SINGLE STOREY EXTENSION TO SOUTH ELEVATION AND TWO 

STOREY EXTENSION TO NORTH ELEVATION AFTER DEMOLITION OF 

EXISTING AND ADDITION OF THERAPY POOL/GARDEN ROOM 

LOCATION: Eames House, Eames Lane, Hawkley, Liss, Hampshire, GU336NN 

REFERENCE NO. F.37422/FUL/PB PARISH: Hawkley 

APPLICANT: Lady S Gosling 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


1. (R5H) The proposal represents the unacceptable enlargement of this 18th Century Cottage to 

form a dwelling of excessive width and bulk and inappropriate design and materials, resulting in 

overdevelopment of this plot to the detriment of the character and fabric of the original dwelling 

and the visual amenities and wider character of the Hawkley Lower Green Conservation Area 

and AONB contrary to General Strategy Policy GS5 of the East Hampshire District Local Plan: 

First Review. 

2. (R5A) In the future East Hampshire District Local Plan: Second Review this site is designated as 

falling outside a settlement policy boundary. The application site would fall within a rural area to 

which restrictive Planning Policies apply. The proposal involves the substantial enlargement of 

this rural dwelling by 77 per cent (excluding the existing single story extensions) which would 

significantly affect its scale and character and involve an unacceptable increase in building mass 

in this rural locality. The proposal would, therefore, represent an over-large extension of the 

dwelling affecting the successful retention of a range of dwellings of varying sizes in an area 

where new dwellings are not permitted contrary to Policy H17 of the East Hampshire District 

Local Plan: Second Review, Second Deposit Draft. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 069 

PROPOSAL: TWO STOREY EXTENSION TO SIDE AND DETACHED SINGLE GARAGE 

LOCATION: 195 London Road, Horndean, Waterlooville, Hampshire, PO8 0HJ 


APPLICANT: Mr & Mrs D Turner 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


44


permission. 


1990. 

2. (E3) The external roofing tiles and render to be used shall match, as closely as possible, in type, 

colour and texture those of the existing building. 





Order) no window(s) or other openings shall at any time be inserted in the first floor northern 

side elevation of the extension hereby permitted without the prior written consent of the Planning 

Authority. 


(properties). 

4. (H4F) Notwithstanding the provisions of Part 1 of Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning 

(General Permitted Development) Order 1995 (or any Order revoking and re-enacting that Order) 

the detached garage hereby permitted shall be retained solely for the parking of private motor 

vehicles and ancillary domestic storage only. 

Reason To ensure adequate on-site car parking provision is provided in accordance with the 

adopted policies of the Planning Authority and in the interests of highway safety. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

45

SECTION V 

Item No. 001 


SOUTH PLANNING COMMITTEE 

DECISIONS MADE UNDER DELEGATED POWERS 

MATTERS RELATING TO TREES 

53 

PC.25/2002 


PROPOSAL: PRUNE CONIFERS BACK TO BOUNDARY OF NO.62 DENNIS WAY 

LOCATION: 14 East Hill Drive, Liss, Hampshire, GU337RR 

REFERENCE NO. F.27806/003/TPO/SG PARISH: Liss 

APPLICANT: Mr Doyle 

CASE OFFICER: Stewart Garside DATE REGISTERED: 11/07/2002 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

NOT PROCEEDED WITH for the following reason: 

1. (UNQ1) The trees subject to this application are not covered by the Tree Preservation Order. 

You do not, therefore, require the formal consent of East Hampshire District Council to carry out 

this work. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 002 

PROPOSAL: TO PRUNE THREE OAK TREES 

LOCATION: West and North, 8 Kiln Field, Liss, Hampshire, GU337SW 

REFERENCE NO. F.37424/TPO/SG PARISH: Liss 

APPLICANT: Miss A Kaye 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

CONSENT granted to prune back to suitable growing points to give 1.5 metres clearance from the roof 

two Oaks on land to the west of 8, Kiln Field, Liss, subject to the following conditions:

1. (W1) All works shall be carried out within one year of the date of this consent to the satisfaction of 

the District Council's Arboricultural Officer. The contractor (or other person) carrying out the 

work shall contact the Arboricultural Officer before starting work and meet him on site if so 

required. 

2. (W2) All works shall be carried out in accordance with BS.3998 (1989). (However, painting of cuts 

with tree sealant shall be discretionary). 

3. (W3) The use of climbing irons (spikes) to enter or move around the tree canopy is strictly 

prohibited. 

REFUSED to prune one Oak to the north of 8, Kiln Field, Liss, for the following reason: 

1. (UNQ1) It is not considered that this tree is having a significant impact on your property at the 

present time and that no pruning is currently required. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

Item No. 003 

PROPOSAL: FELL ONE ASH TREE 

LOCATION: 6 Bishearne Gardens, Liss, Hampshire, GU337SB 

REFERENCE NO. F.37426/TPO/SG PARISH: Liss 

APPLICANT: Jacqueline L Barrass 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

REFUSED to fell one Ash at the rear of 6, Bishearne Gardens, Liss for the following reason. 

1. (UNQ1) As far as it is reasonable to see, the tree is healthy and structurally sound. It also has a 

high general amenity value. The roots pose no threat to your property and shading is not 

considered sufficient reason to warrant the felling of the tree. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

54

SECTION VI – INFORMATION ON APPEALS 

(A) APPEALS LODGED 

South 


SOUTH & NORTH PLANNING COMMITTEES 

REPORT OF THE HEAD OF PLANNING CONTROL 

55 

PC.25/2002 


1) F.31066/001/FUL - Conservatory to rear, 23 North Lane, BURITON – Mr & Mrs Ferkins 

(Written Representations) 

2) F.32706/001/FUL - Two storey rear extension with dormers and two storey extension 

to side, Ford Arun, Snailing Lane, Greatham, Liss (HAWKLEY PARISH) – Mr D 

Cawkell (Hearing) 

3) F.21406/014/ADV - Two illuminated oval logo signs, one illuminated advice sign to 

main entrance, one non-illuminated free standing car park sign and one single sided 

price board, Staunton Arms, 1 Whichers Gate Road, ROWLAND'S CASTLE – Six 

Continents Retail Limited (Written Representations) 

4) F.35263/003/FUL - Detached dwelling after demolition of existing with altered access, 

St Bernard, Lith Crescent, HORNDEAN – Mr D Robinson (Hearing) 

5) F.34759/007/FUL - Stable block, Land to the North of, Brownings Hill, EAST MEON – 

Mrs S Murphy (Hearing) 

6) F.32702/003/FUL - Raising of roof to provide first floor accommodation, 6 South Road, 

HORNDEAN – Dr. R Wheaton (Written Representations) 

7) F.37155/FUL - Roof height raised by 0.8 metres, second storey extension to provide 

bedroom, two dormers and six velux windows. Roofing tiles replaced with slate tiles, 

Thorn Cottage, Rake Road, LISS – Mr M Trench (Hearing) 

8) F.31172/006/FUL - One detached and one pair of two storey dwellings, North, 20 

Station Road, LISS – Mayserve Limited (Written Representations) 

9) F.22878/009/FUL - Relief from condition 5 of F22878/006 to allow garden area to be 

used for outside seating, 25-27 Chapel Street, PETERSFIELD – Pizza Express 


North 

1) F.37183/FUL - Change of use from Class A1 (Retail) to A2 (Insurance Broker), Cozons 

Fabrics, 9-11 High Street, ALTON – Giles (Alton) Ltd (Written Representations) 

2) F.36519/001/FUL - Two detached dwellings with integral garages, associated parking 

and access, 114 Winchester Road, FOUR MARKS – Mr Giles (Written 

Representations)

3) F.36102/001/FUL - Demolition of existing houses and garages and construction of 25 

houses and flats with associated parking and access off Sutton Field (amended 

description - as amended by plans received 5/11/01 and 25/01/02), 4 - 8 Petersfield 

Road and Sutton Field garage court to rear, WHITEHILL/BORDON – Sentinel Housing 

Group (Hearing) 

4) F.35965/004/FUL - Retention of mobile home and siting of second mobile home, 

Badgers End, Red Lane, Churt Road, Headley Down (HEADLEY PARISH) – Mr F 

Keet (Hearing) 

5) F.24687/002/FUL - Conversion of office to eighteen residential apartments with 

associated garaging and parking (duplicate application), St. Lucia Lodge, Lindford 

Road, WHITEHILL/BORDON – Secretary of State for Defence (Public Inquiry) 

6) F.36928/OUT - Outline - residential development with associated access, (site is 

known as RE Lines), Land to the west of St Lucia Lodge, Lindford Road, 

WHITEHILL/BORDON – Secretary of State for Defence (Public Inquiry) 

7) F.27454/018/LBC - Front porch, Aldersey Cottage, Lower Froyle (FROYLE PARISH) – 

Mr D Forrester (Written Representations) 

8) F.32372/010/FUL - Change of use of redundant agricultural building to light industry 

(Class B1) and storage (Class B8) and retention of parking area and earth bund, 

Gilbert Street Farm, Gilbert Street, ROPLEY – Messrs T Hough & Sons (Public Inquiry) 

9) F.32372/011/ENF - Change of use of the land from a mixed use of agricultural use, 

commercial use and use for two residential dwellings to a mixed use of agricultural use, 

commercial use, use for two residential, Gilbert Street Farm, Gilbert Street, ROPLEY – 

Thomas Hough (Public Inquiry) 

(B) APPEALS WITHDRAWN 

South 

1) F.21316/004/FUL - Ten three storey dwellings with new access after demolition of 

existing dwelling (as amended by plans received 12/02/2002), 5 Havant Road, 

HORNDEAN – Fastnet Properties Ltd (Hearing) 

(C) APPEALS ALLOWED 

South 

1) F.23116/013/TEMP - Retention of temporary building for use as a consultancy unit 

(Temporary Permission F23116/011), The Avenue Playingfields, The Avenue, 

PETERSFIELD – Acorns 2000 Petersfield (Written Representations) 

This appeal relates the refusal of the retention of a temporary building adjacent to The 

Avenue Pavilion for a further 2 years. This follows refusal of Outline Permission for the 

Early Years Centre and appeal dismissed in March 2002. 

56

The main issues are:- 

1. The effect on the provision of public open space; 

2. The effects on the character and appearance of the surrounding area including 

Conservation Area; and 

3. Whether unacceptable harm is outweighed by the need for the building 

Relevant Policies are UB3, R1 of the Hampshire County Structure Plan Review, and 

GS5, ENV19 and RT2 of the East Hampshire District Local Plan: First Review. 

Public Space: The Inspector felt there were no changes in circumstances for open 

space since the other appeal and still considered the proposal unacceptable in terms of 

PPG7 Planning for Open Space, Sport and Recreation and Policies R1 and RT2, but 

noted the harm from the loss of space would be lessened by the site, size and 

temporary nature of the proposal. 

Character and appearance of area: The Inspector agreed with the Council that the 

appearance of the building is unsightly and contrary to Policy UB3 but due to its 

location does not affect the area’s openness, or harm the setting of the Conservation 

Area. 

Need for building: In agreement with the Council, The Inspector supports the aims and 

needs of the appellants as a valuable community resource, but only as a temporary 

solution and refers to the logistics of renewing temporary permissions repeatedly. The 

Inspector felt that an additional two years is reasonable for the appellants to find a 

permanent solution. 

The Inspector concluded that the harm to the provision of open space and the area’s 

character and appearance is outweighed by the need for the building’s retention and 

that a temporary period of two years is appropriate. None of the other matters raised, 

outweigh the considerations above. 

The appeal was allowed on 21 st August 2002 subject to the following condition: 

“The building hereby approved shall be removed and the land restored two years 

before the date of the decision to a condition agreed in writing and in accordance with 

the scheme of work submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority”. 

(D) APPEALS DISMISSED 

South 

1) F.28311/007/FUL - Change of use of agricultural land to residential garden, Lawn 

Cottage, North Lane, BURITON – Mr A R Broadway (Written Representations) 

This appeal relates the refusal of retrospective application for a change of use of a strip 

of agricultural land at the rear of the garden adjacent to the public footpath, to domestic 

garden. 

The issues are the effect on the character and appearance of the AONB. 

Relevant Policy is GS2 and ENV1 of the East Hampshire District Local Plan. Central 

Government Guidance is contained in PPG7 The Countryside Environmental Quality 

and Economic and Social Development, PPG15 Planning and the Historic 

Environment. 

57

The Inspector noted the difference between agricultural fields (arable crops etc) and 

domestic gardens (domestic paraphernalia). He also noted the prominence of the 

chain link fence in the landscape. The diversion of the footpath has not harmed the 

landscape but the change of use and fence. Having regard to the current owners 

intentions for use of the land, The Inspector concluded the change of use has altered 

the character of the countryside and harmed its natural beauty. 

2) F.29694/006/FUL - Change of use from agricultural to equestrian and erection of 

fencing, new sand school and associated works (amplified by fax received 12/3/01), 

Land adjoining Parsonage Barn, Harvesting Lane, EAST MEON – Mrs C A Collett 


This appeal relates to the refusal of the change of use from agricultural grazing to land 

for the keeping of horses, new fence and sand school, new hedges. 

The main issue is whether the proposal would conserve and enhance the natural 

beauty of the landscape of the AONB. 

Relevant Policies are E7, C2, E6 of the Hampshire County Structure Plan 2011 

(Review) and Policies ENV11, GS5, ENV1 of the East Hampshire Local Plan, First 

Review. 

Also referred to is PPG7 ‘The Countryside Environmental Quality, Economic & Social 

Development. The development plans reflect the advice that the purpose of 

designation of AONB is to conserve & enhance the natural beauty of the landscape. 

The Inspector noted the need for a rural location, and agreed that the site is not 

prominent, but said that the proposal would be at odds with the prevailing landscape as 

it would be seen from distant views. A hedge along the boundary separates the 

dwellings from their countryside setting, and the appeal site is part of the countryside 

setting, not the dwellings. He said the proposed hedge makes little affect on the overall 

scheme. He concluded that the proposal would neither conserve or enhance the 

natural beauty of the AONB and is thus contrary to national and local policy. 

3) F.36942/FUL - Change of use from agriculture to equestrian with hardstanding and 

formation of vehicular access, Field at corner of Catherington Lane and Lovedean 

Lane, Waterlooville (HORNDEAN PARISH) – Helen Vernon (Written Representations) 

This appeal relates to condition no. 6 (no chattels) on the permission for change of use 

from agriculture to equestrian with hard standing and vehicular access. 

The main issues are the effect of the permitted use without the limitations imposed by 

condition No. 6 on the character of the area (ASLQ). 

Relevant Policy is C1, C2 of the Hampshire County Structure Plan 2011 (Review) and 

Policies G1, GS2 and GS5, ENV2, ENV11 of the East Hampshire Local Plan, First 

Review. 

58

The Inspector said the site is in a prominent location, screened from Catherington Lane 

by a hedge. A new hedge and gate are clearly visible due to the openness of the site, 

and other chattels would not be screened in future. The parking or storage of a horse 

box is not the same as stabling equipment. A stored horse box or lorry would appear 

out of place in the ASLQ. The existing buildings are not particularly intrusive but 

without control increased numbers and positions would be highly intrusive. The lifting of 

the condition would lead to significant harm to the visual qualities of the ASLQ and be 

contrary to Local Plan policy. 

The Inspector noted the appellant’s argument that similar chattels are located nearby 

but concluded that the appeal be dismissed on 19th September 2002. 

4) F.20437/173/FUL - 2 three-storey blocks, comprising eighteen flats in total, Land at 

junction of Marden Way and Moggs Mead, PETERSFIELD – Kebbell Developments 

Ltd (Hearing) 

This appeal relates to the refusal of 18 flats in two blocks and was considered at an 

informal hearing on 3rd April 2002. 

The main issues are the acceptability of the proposed layout and its effect on the 

character of the area and the residential amenity of nearby occupier and any traffic or 

parking hazards. 

Relevant Policies are UB1 and UB3 of the Hampshire County Structure Plan 2011 

(Review) and Policies GS5, RT3, T6, ENV1, E7, of the East Hampshire Local Plan, 

First Review. 

Also referred to are policies H4 and H3 of the draft review of the Local Plan and PPG3 

‘Housing’. Reference is made throughout to central guidance in ‘By Design’, and 

‘Better Places to Live’ 

The Inspector dealt with the issues in three sections, Design & Layout, Residential 

amenity and car parking & access. 

Design & layout: 

The Inspector supports the principle of the higher density of the site and noted that the 

proposal would meet the required density at 40 dph and add variety to house types. 

The ridge heights would not be much higher than two storey houses and the Y shape 

allows for an open setting. The site is within walking distance to town centre facilities, 

but considered the proposal would result in a poor relationship between buildings and 

open space, a lack of relationship with the character of adjoining houses and is not 

clear about which is public or private space. He did not think that this could be 

overcome by landscaping. 

Residential amenity: 

If this site is to be developed at the density indicated it is evident that some overlooking 

and loss of amenity has to be accepted. The southern building would lead to more 

overlooking of houses in Marden Way and Wetherdown than from two storey houses. 

The balcony would add to this. The effect would be overly oppressive and reduce the 

quality of life for existing occupiers. This could be amended with loss of the southern 

building. 

59

North 

Car parking & access: 

The revised application reduces the number of parking spaces, receiving no objections 

from the Council over manoeuvring and over provision of spaces. With due care and 

attention the arrangement should not be unduly hazardous. He supports the use of an 

upper limit to parking provision to create a traffic calming effect as shown in Better 

Places to live. 

In conclusion the principle of developing this site at the proposed density is acceptable, 

but the design and layout and harm to residential amenity is poor. As such it is contrary 

to Structure Plan and Local Plan policy and does not outweigh the need to secure early 

development of the site. 

1) F.36784/FUL - Detached double garage to front, 33 Winston Rise, FOUR MARKS – Mr 

P Raymont (Written Representations) 

The Inspector considered that the main issue in this case is the effect of the proposed 

development on the character and appearance of the surrounding residential area. 

He found that the appeal site contains a modern two-storey detached house located on 

the south side of a long residential cul-de-sac known as Winston Rise. The appeal 

property is situated quite close to the entrance and lowest point on Winston Rise and 

on the inside of a rising curve in the road. 

He considered that the individuality of the properties in Winston Rise together with their 

regular spacing and setting back behind small gardens combine to create a spacious 

and attractive character that is well worth preserving. 

Despite an existing hedge, he found that the wide driveway opening shared by the 

appeal property and No. 35 would allow direct sight of the garage from the south-west 

and its presence would thus be obvious to anyone entering Winston Rise. 

In his opinion, the proposed development would break the established pattern of built 

form in Winston Rise by introducing a detached garage in front of, and separated from, 

the established building line. Given the influence of the front garden setting, the overall 

visual impact of the development would, in his opinion, be harmful to the rhythm of the 

street scene and detract significantly from the openness of the surrounding residential 

area. 

Furthermore, the proposed garage would be built within 1 metre of the roadside section 

of the adjacent hedge and the ground level drops sharply on the opposite side of this 

boundary. In these circumstances, construction of the garage might jeopardize the 

health of the hedge which, if lost, would reduce the general attractiveness and variety 

of the street scene and also leave the proposed garage fully exposed in view. 

Finally, he noted the Council’s concern that the construction of a garage in front of the 

established building line would create a precedent for other similar proposals along 

Winston Rise, whose implementation would generally alter for the worse the open 

character of the road. Cases need to be considered on their individual merits, but 

given the evidence that a number of properties appear to have sufficient depth of front 

garden to accommodate similar proposals, he considered that other property owners 

could well be influenced by the outcome of this appeal. In this instance, therefore, The 

Inspector believed that this argument over precedent reinforces the conclusion he has 

reached on the main issue that this appeal should be dismissed. 

60

2) F.31882/001/FUL - Single storey rear extension and porch to side, Grooms Farm 

Cottage, Frith End, BORDON – Mr & Mrs R Kirby (Written Representations) 

Grooms Farm Cottage is one of a pair of semi-detached dwellings and lies within the 

open countryside where there are strict national and local policies of restraint on 

development. The latter include Policy H16 of the East Hampshire District Local Plan: 

First Review, which has the dual objectives of maintaining a supply of smaller dwellings 

and protecting the character and appearance of the countryside. 

Accordingly, the policy sets a limit of 100 sq. m. to the size of the dwelling or an 

increase of 50% of the original size, whichever is the greater. The Council has clarified 

the policy in its representation on the appeal by explaining that if a cumulative 50% of 

additions leaves the building with less than 100 sq. m. then the property may be further 

extended to achieve this floorspace limit. 

In this case, the proposal would result in a cumulative 93% increase in the floor area of 

the original dwelling and the existing floorspace is well in excess of 100 sq. m. The 

extent to which the building has already changed in size and character is clear by a 

visual comparison with the adjoining dwelling. And these further extensions, resulting 

in almost doubling in the size of the original building, would be in clear breach of a 

policy that he considered to be soundly based and requires consistent application if its 

objectives are to be achieved. He therefore dismissed the appeal. 

3) F.23469/007 - Appeal against the issue of an Enforcement Notice to secure the 

cessation of the use of two caravans for residential purposes and their removal from 

the land, Gilbert Street Farm, Gilbert Street, ROPLEY – Mr T Hough 

The appellant appealed on: 

Ground (d): that when the notice was issued no enforcement action could be taken in 

respect of any breach of planning control. 

Ground (g): that any period specified in the notice falls short of what should reasonably 

be allowed. 

On ground (d) the Inspector found that there was no supporting documentary evidence 

to indicate continuous occupation of the three caravans between 1991 - 2002. (It was 

accepted by the Planning Authority, before the Notice was served, that one occupied 

caravan on the land was immune from planning control. Hence the notice only requires 

two of the caravans to be removed). The Inspector also found that the appellant’s 

explanation of why there were no rent books, or tenancy agreements was somewhat 

tenuous in view of the claimed nature and duration of the residential occupation. Due 

to the paucity of the appellant’s own evidence and the contradictory evidence 

submitted by the Council, the Inspector found that the material change of use of the 

land to a mixed use including the siting of the caravans did not occur more than 10 

years before the issue of the enforcement notice. The ground (d) appeal therefore 

failed. 

On ground (g) the appellant stated that the tenants of the caravans would have 

difficulty finding alternative accommodation within the compliance period. The 

Inspector found that the six month period provided in the notice, was likely to be 

adequate time for the tenants to find alternative accommodation. The ground (g) 

appeal therefore failed. 

61


permanent cessation of the use of the building on the land for vehicle repairs and 

storage of vehicle and parts, other than for agricultural vehicles; and the permanent 

removal of all equipment associated with the repairs and storage of vehicle from the 

building on the land, other than agricultural vehicles, Gilbert Street Farm, ROPLEY – 

Mr T Hough 


Ground (c): that those matters do not constitute a breach of planning control. 

Ground (d): that when the notice was issued no enforcement action could be taken in 

respect of any breach of planning control. 

On ground (c) the Inspector found the notice was concerned with the use of the 

building rather than operational development. The appellant did not argue that 

planning permission was not needed for this material change of use. Consequently the 

Inspector found that there was no basis for a ground (c) appeal. The ground (c) appeal 

therefore failed. 

On ground (d) the Inspector found that evidence on the use of the building submitted 

by the appellant was vague and unsupported by documents relating to the businesses 

said to be involved. The inspector found that the flimsy evidence submitted in this case 

fell short of discharging the onus of proof. The ground (d) appeal therefore failed. 

5) F.31877/002 - Appeal against the service of an Enforcement Notice to secure the 

demolition of the wall and wall with fence, Land at 168 Andlers Ash Road, LISS – L N 

Hammond (Written Representations) 

The appellant appealed on Ground (a): that planning permission should be granted for 

the development the subject of the notice. 

The Inspector found that as a replacement wall or fence of up to 1m above ground 

level could be erected as permitted development under Class A of Part 2 of Schedule 2 

to the Town and Country Planning Order 1995, the recipient of the notice should be 

given the option of reducing the height of the existing structure to less than 1m. The 

Inspector amended the notice accordingly. 

The Inspector found that the main issues were: the effect of the development on the 

character and appearance of the area and highway safety. 

The Inspector was of the view that the boundary walls and fence give the appeal 

frontage a stark urban appearance which contrasted with the hedges and trees 

opposite, to the north-east and beyond the railway line to the west. Because of its 

height and length it was considered an over-dominant, incongruous feature which 

seriously harmed the pleasant character of an area which is of national importance for 

its outstanding natural beauty. 

The Inspector found that the retention of the unauthorised development would give rise 

to serious highway dangers and thereby conflicted with local plan policy GS5. The 

Inspector refused to grant planning permission, and upheld the enforcement notice, as 

amended. 

62

6) F.23815/005 – Appeal against the issue of an Enforcement Notice to remove the fence 

and any resulting materials from the site, Land at Broxhead Trading Estate, Lindford 

(HEADLEY PARISH) – Highland Properties (Written Representations) 


Ground (c): that those matters do not constitute a breach of planning control. 

Ground (a): that planning permission should be granted for the development the 

subject of the notice. 

On ground (c) the Inspector concluded that it was clear that when the notice was 

served on the 11th December 2001 the fence did exceed two metres in height, and 

was therefore subject to planning control. The ground (c) appeal failed. 

The Inspector found that the principal issue on the ground (a) appeal was the effect of 

the development on the countryside. The Inspector found that a fence greater than two 

metres in height would be an intrusive feature in this area of countryside. 

The Inspector also found that the siting of a fence in its present location may 

encourage the expansion of industrial activities beyond the policy boundary, which 

would be undesirable. The ground (a) appeal failed. 


cessation of the use of the land for the parking of vehicles and for storage purposes, 

including vehicles, caravans and camper van bodies; and to permanently remove the 

motor vehicles, caravans and camper van bodies, and to erect a fence not in excess of 

two metres along the defined policy boundary line, Land at Broxhead Trading Estate, 

Lindford Road, Lindford (HEADLEY PARISH) – Highland Properties Limited (Written 

Representations) 

The appellant appealed on ground (f): that the steps required by the notice exceed 

what is necessary to remedy any breach of planning control. 

The Inspector found that there was evidence that commercial activities associated with 

the industrial estate had expanded beyond the policy boundary into the open 

countryside, resulting in the service of the notice the subject of the appeal. He found 

that the provision of bollards, as suggested by the appellant to define the policy 

boundary, (as opposed to a fence required by the notice), may not be sufficient to 

prevent the storage of vehicles or other items on the land outside the policy boundary, 

and that a more substantial boundary was necessary. The ground (f) appeal therefore 

failed. 

(E) CONFIRMATION OF ARRANGEMENTS 

South 

1) F.22577/010/LBC - Alteration and extension of existing buildings to form 13 dwellings 

together with an additional block of six flats and four houses with associated garages 

and landscaping (amended description) (as amended by plans received 02/01/2002 

and letter and plans received 19/02/2002), Ludshott Manor, Woolmer Lane, 

BRAMSHOTT/LIPHOOK – MaCleod Limited (Public Inquiry) 

Tuesday 22 October 2002 at Liphook Village Hall, Headley Road, Liphook commencing 

at 10:00am. 

Note: Copies of the Inspector’s Appeal Decision Letters are available for inspection in the Member’s 

room and will also be brought to the meeting. 

63

03102002 Delegated.pdf - East Hampshire District Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?