14.05.2015 Views

Bilsthorpe & Rufford - Newark and Sherwood District Council

Bilsthorpe & Rufford - Newark and Sherwood District Council

Bilsthorpe & Rufford - Newark and Sherwood District Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Site Ref:<br />

South of Mickledale Lane<br />

08_0442 Area(ha): 16.61 Parish: RUFFORD Proposed Yield : 354<br />

Suitability Conculsion<br />

Availability Conclusions:<br />

Availability Comments:<br />

Achievability Conclusion:<br />

Achievabilty Comments:<br />

Overall Draft Conclusion:<br />

Overall Final Conclusion:<br />

The site may be suitable<br />

The site could be available in 10 - 15 years time<br />

The site is economically viable/acheivable for housing<br />

Viable - Assessed at 30 DPH with 5% site area reduction (floodzone 3 + TPO) <strong>and</strong><br />

a further 25% to make overall 30% on-site POS no POS commuted sum. Site split<br />

into 3 phases of 5.536 Ha. with each phase yielding 118 units giving a total yield<br />

354 units<br />

Potential contamination issues at the site would need to be investigated <strong>and</strong><br />

mitigated if necessary. Approx 5% of the site lies within Environment<br />

Agency Flood Zone 3 where residential development should be resisted.<br />

Although constraints could prevent part of the site from being developed,<br />

some areas could accommodate development. If the Village Envelope<br />

designation is changed through the Development Plan process, this site<br />

could be considered suitable subject to appropriate mitigation works. The<br />

site is Achievable <strong>and</strong> it is considered that it could be developed within 10- 15<br />

years.<br />

Potential contamination issues at the site would need to be investigated <strong>and</strong><br />

mitigated if necessary. Approx 5% of the site lies within Environment<br />

Agency Flood Zone 3 where residential development should be resisted.<br />

Although constraints could prevent part of the site from being developed,<br />

some areas could accommodate development. If the Village Envelope<br />

designation is changed through the Development Plan process, this site<br />

could be considered suitable subject to appropriate mitigation works. The<br />

site is Achievable <strong>and</strong> it is considered that it could be developed within 10-<br />

15 years.<br />

Character L<strong>and</strong> Use Location<br />

Location: Village (outside but adjoining Boundary) PDL/Greenfield: Combination<br />

Area Character:<br />

Setting:<br />

Current Use:<br />

MixedCountryside/Residential/Employm<br />

ent<br />

Other Countryside/Residential/Employment<br />

Industrial/AgricultureOther<br />

The site may be suitable<br />

Area Greenfield: 8.74<br />

Area PDL: 7.87<br />

Proposed Use:<br />

Policy<br />

The site may be suitable<br />

AllocatedSite: Not Allocated Other: H13 - Housing Development in Large Villages,<br />

PU4 - Aquifer Protection Zone, NE1 -<br />

Development in the Countryside, NE9 -<br />

<strong>Sherwood</strong> Forest Special L<strong>and</strong>scape Area<br />

Conflicting Issues Yes Partly outside Village Envelope<br />

Access to Services<br />

The site is suitable<br />

Within 800m or 10 mins walking<br />

Primary school: No<br />

GP/ Health<br />

Centre:<br />

No<br />

Store of Local Importance:<br />

Cash<br />

Machine/PO:<br />

Yes<br />

Within 30 mins travel by public transport<br />

Bus stop: Yes Secondary school: No<br />

Further Education:<br />

Supermarket:<br />

No<br />

No<br />

Retail Area:<br />

Hospital:<br />

Employment:<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

Yes<br />

Proximity to<br />

Town centre:<br />

Over 1km from a town centre<br />

Ollerton Town Centre 8609m<br />

Proximity<br />

Transport Node:<br />

Over 1km from a major public transport<br />

node

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!