15.05.2015 Views

Gaudiya siddhanta - ebooks - ISKCON desire tree

Gaudiya siddhanta - ebooks - ISKCON desire tree

Gaudiya siddhanta - ebooks - ISKCON desire tree

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

yada bhramam bhramam harirasagalad-vaisnavajanam<br />

kadacit sampasyamstadanugamane syadruciyutah<br />

tada krsna vrttya tyajati sanakairmayaikadasam<br />

svarupam vibhrano vimalarasabhogam sa kurute<br />

"After repeatedly wandering in the path of mayik existence, a fallen soul may meet a pure Vaisnava<br />

from whom trickles the nectar of the mellows of pure devotion to Lord Hari. By following that pure<br />

devotee, he becomes attracted to imbibe the sweet principle of devotional service. By constant study of<br />

Krsna-bhakti, he slowly abandons the mayik condition, and in the end obtaining his true nature, he<br />

enjoys the sweetest unalloyed rasa, which is the ultimate status of the soul."<br />

It is to be understood that there is a progression in the descent of divine knowledge. Sri Madhva<br />

preached the philosophy of Dvaitavada in order to counter the widespread Mayavada doctrine of Adi<br />

Sankara which was prevalent at that time.<br />

It is acknowledged by the <strong>Gaudiya</strong> school that the doctrine of Dvaita is an intrinsic part in the evolution<br />

of theism. It was propagated according to kala and patra (time and circumstance) and was not meant to<br />

be the last word in the Absolute Truth.<br />

Rasa-tattva is a very subtle truth and could not have been taught during that period of India’s history.<br />

The necessity of the time demanded that a powerful acarya boldly expound the basic beliefs of the Vedic<br />

scriptures and burn the weeds of Advaitavada to the roots. It is only fitting that the incarnation of<br />

Bhima performed this task. How could such a forceful personality explain the subtle divine mellows of<br />

madhurya-rasa? This would be inconsistent with his character. Therefore the intricate concepts of rasavicara<br />

were later expounded by Sri Caitanyadeva and His followers.<br />

Our Tattvavadi friends raise the question as to why Baladeva wrote a commentary on the Brahmasutras<br />

when Sri Madhvacarya had already done so. It is understood that Srimad Bhagavatam is the<br />

natural commentary on the Brahma-sutras. This is stated in Garuda Purana —<br />

artho ’yam brahma-sutranam<br />

bharatartha-vinirnayah<br />

gayatri-bhasya-rupo ’sah<br />

vedartha-paribrmhitah<br />

grantho ’stadasa-sahasrah<br />

srimad-bhagavatabhidhah<br />

"The Srimad-Bhagavatam is the authorized explanation of Brahma-sutras, and it is a further explanation<br />

of Mahabharata. It is the expansion of the gayatri-mantra and the essence of all Vedic knowledge. This<br />

Srimad-Bhagavatam, containing eighteen thousand verses, is known as the explanation of all Vedic<br />

literature."<br />

However, since Sankara commented upon the pristine teachings of Vyasa found in the Brahma-sutras, it<br />

was the duty of the Vaisnava acaryas such as Sri Ramanuja and Sri Madhva to counter his doctrine of<br />

illusion and present their own commentaries.<br />

Sri Sri Radha-Govindadeva

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!