17.11.2012 Views

Non Strategic Nuclear Weapons - Federation of American Scientists

Non Strategic Nuclear Weapons - Federation of American Scientists

Non Strategic Nuclear Weapons - Federation of American Scientists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Non</strong>-<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>Weapons</strong> May 2012<br />

away in the Sea <strong>of</strong> Japan. 142 Likewise, in July 2011, two Tarantul III class corvettes from<br />

Vladivostok Naval Base conducted an exercise that involved launching SS-N-22<br />

missiles. 143<br />

Many <strong>of</strong> the navy’s non-strategic weapon systems are old and probably approaching<br />

retirement. With conventional weapons becoming more capable it is likely that new warships<br />

will enter service with fewer nuclear weapon systems. The ones that are left might<br />

be modified. Vice Admiral Oleg Burtsev, deputy head <strong>of</strong> the Navy General Staff, told<br />

RIA Novosti in 2009 that, “Probably, tactical nuclear weapons [on submarines] will play a<br />

key role in the future…Their range and precision are gradually increasing.” He concluded<br />

that, “There is no longer any need to equip missiles with powerful nuclear warheads. We<br />

can install low-yield warheads on existing cruise missiles.” 144<br />

This statement caused some to speculate that Russia was about to develop a whole<br />

new class <strong>of</strong> low-yield naval non-strategic nuclear weapons, but there is no indication <strong>of</strong><br />

that yet. Similarly, a statement made in September 2006 by then Defense Minister Sergei<br />

Ivanov, that Russia at that time had eight submarines at sea (including five strategic and<br />

three multipurpose submarines) ready to launch nuclear weapons, caused some to speculate<br />

that Russia was still deploying non-strategic nuclear weapons at sea in peacetime. But<br />

Mr. Ivanov appears to have been referring to the ability <strong>of</strong> the strategic submarines to<br />

launch, as all non-strategic nuclear weapons are in storage on land.<br />

Defense <strong>Weapons</strong><br />

Under the Presidential <strong>Nuclear</strong> Initiatives, the air-defense forces were slated to be reduced<br />

by 50 percent, but appear to have been cut by 60 percent. <strong>Non</strong>-governmental experts<br />

estimated 4,000 air-defense warheads in 1988, 145 and perhaps 3,000 remaining in<br />

1991. 146 Many <strong>of</strong> those warheads were for the SA-5 Gammon, which has since been retired.<br />

It is estimated that approximately 400 warheads are assigned to defensive forces,<br />

with more in queue for dismantlement.<br />

<strong>Non</strong>-strategic warheads for defensive forces fall into three categories: missile defense,<br />

air-defense and coastal defense. The missile and air-defense weapons are <strong>of</strong>ten referred to<br />

as strategic defense weapons, but since they are not <strong>of</strong>fensive strategic nuclear forces and<br />

Russia has included anti-aircraft weapons in declarations about the Presidential <strong>Nuclear</strong><br />

Initiatives, they are included here as non-strategic nuclear forces.<br />

142 Zvezda Television, April 23, 2010, 18:05 GMT; U.S. Open Source Center, “Russian TV military reports: Navy missile<br />

launches, V-Day parade rehearsal,” NewsEdge Document Number 201004241477.1_947400ac5b657830, April 23, 2010.<br />

143 Moscow Rossiya 24, July 19, 2011, 7:45 GMT; U.S. Open Source Center, “TV shows navy missile launch in Russia’s Far<br />

East,” NewsEdge Document Number 201107191477.1_558d0023b959e145, July 19, 2011.<br />

144 “Russia should focus on tactical nuclear weapons for subs,” RIA Novosti, March 23, 2003,<br />

http://en.rian.ru/russia/20090323/120688454.html<br />

145 Thomas B. Cochran, et al., <strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>Weapons</strong> Databook Volume IV: Soviet <strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>Weapons</strong> (Harper & Row, 1989), p. 32.<br />

146 Alexei Arbatov, “Deep Cuts and De-Alerting: A Russian Perspective,” in Harold A. Feiveson (ed.), The <strong>Nuclear</strong> Turning<br />

Point (Brookings Institution Press, 1999), p. 319.<br />

61 <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>American</strong> <strong>Scientists</strong> www.FAS.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!