17.11.2012 Views

Non Strategic Nuclear Weapons - Federation of American Scientists

Non Strategic Nuclear Weapons - Federation of American Scientists

Non Strategic Nuclear Weapons - Federation of American Scientists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Non</strong>-<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>Weapons</strong> May 2012<br />

The SS-21 is being replaced with the SS-26 Stone (Iskander). The new missile might<br />

be nuclear-capable but the status is uncertain. Back in the late-1990s, various reports circulated<br />

that President Boris Yeltsin had signed several decrees regarding nuclear weapons,<br />

one <strong>of</strong> which allegedly concerned operationalizing the SS-26 with a nuclear warhead. 153<br />

These decrees have widely been interpreted since as showing an increased Russian reliance<br />

on nuclear weapons. 154<br />

There are no signs from commercial satellite images that SS-26 deployment has begun<br />

in Kaliningrad, but the weapon system is being deployed in western Russia, starting with<br />

the 26 th Missile Brigade base (58°44'56.23"N, 29°49'21.66"E) outside Luga some 130 km<br />

south <strong>of</strong> Saint Petersburg. The base is being upgraded from SS-21 to support the SS-26<br />

and a satellite image from May 12, 2010, shows what might be a shipment <strong>of</strong> mobile<br />

launches at a nearby rail station.<br />

The chief <strong>of</strong> Russia’s ground forces, Colonel General Alexander Postnikov, said in<br />

February 2010 that it was “planned to equip a brigade <strong>of</strong> the Leningrad Military District<br />

with the Iskander advanced missile systems this year.” But he insisted that the deployment<br />

was not linked to the deployment <strong>of</strong> the U.S. missile defense system in Poland. 155<br />

<strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>Weapons</strong> Storage Sites<br />

According to the Russian government, “all Russian non-strategic nuclear weapons are<br />

concentrated in centralized storage bases exclusively ob [sic] the national territory.” 156<br />

The U.S. intelligence community agrees: “In peacetime all nuclear munitions except those<br />

on ICBMs and SLBMs in alert status are stored in nuclear weapons storage sites.” 157<br />

The Russian government has not defined what types <strong>of</strong> facilities constitute “centralized<br />

storage bases,” and the assertion by the U.S. intelligence community that “most” <strong>of</strong><br />

Russia’s non-strategic nuclear warheads are in “central depots” suggests that some weapons<br />

153 For sources on a nuclear capability for the SS-26, see: Alexei Arbatov, “A Russian Perspective o the Challenge <strong>of</strong><br />

U.S., NATO and Russian <strong>Non</strong>-<strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>Weapons</strong>,” in Steve Andreasen and Isabelle Williams (ed.),<br />

Gunnar Arbman and Charles Thornton, Russia’s Tactical <strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>Weapons</strong>: Part II: Technical Issues and Policy Recommendations,<br />

Swedish Research Defense Agency, FOI-R—1588—SE, February 2005, p. 50.<br />

[Indent] Other sources do not agree the Iskander-M has been equipped with nuclear capability. Jane’s <strong>Strategic</strong> <strong>Weapons</strong><br />

Systems, states that the Iskander-M “has been considered to have the potential to carry a tactual nuclear warhead,<br />

or a chemical warhead, but there are no reports about these options being developed.” Jane’s <strong>Strategic</strong> Weapon Systems,<br />

2010-2011 (Jane’s Information Group, 2010).<br />

154 The reports about a nuclear capability for the Iskander appear to be based on a small number <strong>of</strong> newspaper articles<br />

and interviews. For description, see: Gunnar Arbman and Charles Thornton, Russia’s Tactical <strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>Weapons</strong>: Part II: Technical<br />

Issues and Policy Recommendations, Swedish Research Defense Agency, FOI-R—1588—SE, February 2005, pp. 2, 14, 25,<br />

44, 50, 51, and 52.<br />

155 “Iskander plan in NW Russia not linked to U.S. deployment in Europe,” RIA Novosti, February 25, 2010,<br />

http://en.rian.ru/mlitary_news/20100225/158004472.html<br />

156 President <strong>of</strong> the Russian <strong>Federation</strong>, Practical Steps <strong>of</strong> the Russian <strong>Federation</strong> in the field <strong>of</strong> nuclear disarmament, May 2010, p. 8.<br />

157 U.S. National Intelligence Council, Annual Report to Congress on the Safety and Security <strong>of</strong> Russian <strong>Nuclear</strong> Facilities and Military<br />

Forces, April 2006, p. 5,<br />

http://www.dni.gov/electronic_reading_room/AnnualReportOnSafetyAndSecurityOfRussion<strong>Nuclear</strong>FacilitiesAndMilita<br />

ryForces.pdf<br />

65 <strong>Federation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>American</strong> <strong>Scientists</strong> www.FAS.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!