17.06.2015 Views

Shetland Local Landscape Designation Review: Final Report

Shetland Local Landscape Designation Review: Final Report

Shetland Local Landscape Designation Review: Final Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WEIGHTING<br />

7.12 In order to reflect the importance of those criteria which are most influential<br />

in the perception of ‘special landscapes’, a system of weighting was developed.<br />

Three criteria were given additional weight, as follows:<br />

<br />

The rarity criterion was double-weighted, as a characteristic of special<br />

landscapes; and<br />

The scenic qualities, and views criteria were triple-weighted, as these<br />

were seen as the most significant qualities in terms of the perception of<br />

landscapes.<br />

7.13 These criteria were agreed with SIC following a number of trials with<br />

alternative weightings. It was notable that broadly similar results were<br />

obtained regardless of the weighting applied, with the same core areas<br />

scoring continuously highly.<br />

TOTAL SCORES<br />

7.14 A combined map was prepared using the total weighted score for each LCU.<br />

These were calculated by assigning a value of 1 to a ‘low’ evaluation, and 4 to<br />

a ‘very high’ evaluation for non-weighted criteria. These numbers were<br />

doubled or tripled for the weighted criteria noted above.<br />

7.15 The weighted scores have a possible range of between 14 and 56, though<br />

most areas scored between 30 and 50. Scores for each area are set out in<br />

Table 7.1 (ordered by LCU number) and Table 7.2 (ordered by total<br />

score). The total scores are illustrated on Figure 7.10.<br />

7.16 Esha Ness and Hillswick (22) was the single highest-scoring LCU, with 51<br />

points, followed by Gunnister (23) and North Bressay and Noss (47) each<br />

with 49 points. Areas in or adjacent to the NSAs make up the majority of<br />

the highest scoring areas.<br />

7.17 The lowest-scoring landscape was Sullom Voe (15) with 24 points, followed<br />

by Gluss and Sullom (17) with 27 points. Both of these areas are affected by<br />

the large-scale industrial development at Sullom Voe oil terminal. Other<br />

lower-scoring areas included the less remarkable moorland areas on the<br />

Mainland and Yell.<br />

AREA OF SEARCH<br />

7.18 The highest-scoring LCUs in the evaluation process form the Area of Search<br />

for candidate <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Landscape</strong> Areas. It was agreed with SIC that the highestscoring<br />

50% of LCUs would form the Area of Search, to be examined in<br />

greater detail at the next stage. While this is recognised as an arbitrary cutoff,<br />

it is considered that the very best of the <strong>Shetland</strong> landscapes, ie those<br />

that most merit designation, will be found within these LCUs.<br />

7.19 29 LCUs were selected to form the Area of Search, being those that scored<br />

40 points or more in the final evaluation, representing slightly more than 50%.<br />

These LCUs are highlighted in bold text in Table 7.2, and are illustrated in<br />

Figure 7.11.<br />

<strong>Shetland</strong> Islands <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Landscape</strong> <strong>Designation</strong> <strong>Review</strong><br />

Land Use Consultants<br />

<strong>Final</strong> <strong>Report</strong> 40 October 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!