20.06.2015 Views

ESD design guide for Australian Government buildings: Edition 2

ESD design guide for Australian Government buildings: Edition 2

ESD design guide for Australian Government buildings: Edition 2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

esd opportunities in building<br />

OPPORTUNITY 9<br />

water conservation<br />

<strong>Government</strong> Buildings – Possible<br />

Water Savings<br />

‘The potential savings available from<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>buildings</strong><br />

and operations are between 4,296<br />

and 7,405 ML/year. This is based<br />

on savings assumptions by building<br />

type developed through the desktop<br />

study and site assessments.<br />

Achieving these savings would cost<br />

between $8.2 and $14.6 million<br />

based on cost assumptions derived<br />

from empirical case studies in the<br />

literature.’ 43<br />

Figure 39: Water reduction methods 42 , ISF.<br />

A dual flush toilet replacing a<br />

single flush unit in an office<br />

building will save approximately<br />

360 litres each working day (90<br />

kL per year) in a female toilet,<br />

an annual financial saving from<br />

potable water alone of about $90<br />

or more. For a male toilet the<br />

saving will be about 40kL/year.<br />

For the Edmund Barton building,<br />

with approximately 2,800 staff, this<br />

would mean an annual saving of<br />

more than 9 ML, or $11,000 <strong>for</strong> a<br />

A recent study by the Institute <strong>for</strong><br />

Sustainable Futures showed that an<br />

80% reduction of potable water and<br />

90% of sewage was possible in a<br />

commercial building<br />

Opportunities <strong>for</strong> water reduction are<br />

as follows (these are discussed in<br />

greater detail below):<br />

• management and monitoring,<br />

• leak avoidance,<br />

• efficient fixtures and fittings,<br />

• water sensitive landscaping and<br />

• source substitution.<br />

Figure 40: Water image, stock.XCHNG.<br />

Efficient fixtures and fittings<br />

Water efficiency labels are being<br />

Management and monitoring<br />

Regular monitoring of meters<br />

and sub-meters, either manually<br />

or by connection to the Building<br />

introduced <strong>for</strong> many water-using<br />

appliances. Specification of efficient<br />

fixtures and fittings (as noted below)<br />

can reduce water wastage.<br />

Management System. This is<br />

particularly useful in establishing<br />

base flow rates and then identifying<br />

leaks when water use exceeds normal<br />

variability ranges.<br />

Toilets and urinals<br />

• Toilet and urinal adjustment<br />

– adjust floater to use minimal<br />

water<br />

• 3/ 4.5L dual flush toilets<br />

Leak avoidance<br />

• Urinal flush controls – sensors<br />

• Report of leaks to building<br />

management - building occupants<br />

should be made aware of where<br />

and to whom they can report any<br />

leaks. It is important to promptly fix<br />

any reported leakages <strong>for</strong> positive<br />

feedback.<br />

• Waterless Urinals<br />

Showers<br />

• Flow regulators – need good advice<br />

on type as some may result in an<br />

inadequate shower<br />

• AAA or AAAA showerheads – made<br />

• Regular inspections of toilets,<br />

urinals, taps and showers.<br />

to increase pressure so as to still<br />

have a good shower<br />

Taps<br />

• Flow restrictors <strong>for</strong> taps and tap<br />

aerators<br />

of under four years.’<br />

• Automatic cut-off and sensor<br />

‘In a busy public building, the<br />

saving from a dual flush toilet<br />

operated taps<br />

retrofit could be more than 1 kL per<br />

day per toilet, or about 400 kL/year<br />

<strong>for</strong> a building open every day of<br />

the year. The cost of retrofitting<br />

dual flush toilets depends upon<br />

the plumbing changes and<br />

redecorating that would be<br />

required. It can range from $250 to<br />

41 Berry T., Edgerton N., Milne G., Jha M. and White<br />

S. (2004) Feasibility Study <strong>for</strong> a Policy on Water in<br />

<strong>Government</strong> Operations, ISF, Sydney, July 2004.)<br />

p. 41-42.<br />

42 Chanan, V., White, S., Jha, M., & Howe, C. 2003,<br />

‘Sustainable Water Management in Commercial<br />

Office Buildings’ Innovations in Water: Ozwater<br />

Convention & Exhibition, Perth, 6-10 April 2003.<br />

43 Berry T., Edgerton N., Milne G., Jha, M. and White<br />

S. 2004, Feasibility Study <strong>for</strong> a Policy on Water in<br />

<strong>Government</strong> Operations, ISF, Sydney, July 2004.)<br />

<strong>ESD</strong> DESIGN GUIDE FOR AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS 031

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!