MPO Policy and Procedures Manual - Indianapolis Metropolitan ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

scope, schedule, and budget, and review interim and final deliverables for content and grammar. Particularly significant projects should include the development of an annotated outline as a specific task item. Document Standards Draft documents should include the following items: 44 • Cover sheet with title of project, date of final submittal, and MPO logo • A version number and date history, including reviewer names. Final documents should include the following items: • Cover sheet with title of project, date of final submittal, and MPO logo • MPO logo in either the header or footer of the document • A table of contents, including page numbers • A credits page, which lists the MPO project manager, MPO staff, contractor address and staff members (if applicable), and other pertinent stakeholders (e.g., study review committee) • An executive summary • A paragraph statement of the study’s purpose and need, including its relationship to the LRTP goals and objectives the UPWP • (Optional) A paragraph statement of the study’s relationship to the MPO Strategic Plan. Note that contractor logos are generally not allowed on any interim or final documents, including PowerPoint presentations, display boards, or handouts. Contractors may be listed (text only) on the credits page (see above) and the rear cover (text and address only). All final deliverables should be developed with the viewing public in mind. While not required for all documents, projects of significant scope that have a large potential for public review should be developed using desktop publishing software. File size is an issue that should be considered in final document submittal. Generally, documents will be posted on the web, so file sizes should be commensurate with downloading. Images in particular (including maps) should be subject to special scrutiny. Images intended for direct display on a web page should be no larger than 50k and 90 dpi. Images embedded in PDF documents can have larger resolution, but the overall file size of the document should then be scrutinized. If it is not possible to have a manageable document file size with images, then a version without images should be submitted, along with separate files for individual image viewing. If there are any questions, please contact MPO staff for further guidance. Map Standards All hardcopy and electronic map versions, regardless of interim or final status, should have the following elements: • Title • A listed scale, either by use of a scale bar or a text scale • North arrow
• Data source credits • Legend (for thematic maps) For projects that will see the development of many maps, the inclusion of a “base map” early in the project process is usually a helpful way to address questions of layout and format. 45
Page 1 and 2: Indianapolis Metropolitan Planning
Page 3 and 4: Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION B
Page 5 and 6: 1. Introduction Background Metropol
Page 7 and 8: The current Metropolitan Planning A
Page 9 and 10: 2. Work Program and Products SAFETE
Page 11 and 12: 6. Be adopted and transmitted to IN
Page 13 and 14: 3. Indianapolis Long-Range Transpor
Page 16 and 17: Air Quality Conformity The 9-county
Page 18 and 19: • Highway Safety Improvement Prog
Page 20 and 21: Air Quality Conformity Determinatio
Page 22 and 23: 18 (this page intentionally left bl
Page 24 and 25: The funding for projects shown in t
Page 26 and 27: ‣ Provide improvements to air qua
Page 28 and 29: Formal Amendment Process The MPO pr
Page 30 and 31: • Moving any project phase progra
Page 32 and 33: attached in PDF format. No hard cop
Page 34 and 35: 30 federal fiscal year (October 1)
Page 36 and 37: Federal legislation and the State o
Page 38 and 39: FTA Funding FTA funds are distribut
Page 40 and 41: new formula grant program allocated
Page 42 and 43: those traditionally underserved by
Page 44 and 45: their neighborhoods. The EJ Program
Page 46 and 47: evisited. As a rule, however, the M
Page 52 and 53: Responsibilities It is somewhat mis
Page 54 and 55: e reallocated from slower activitie
Page 56 and 57: Data The primary data source for de
Page 58 and 59: 54 that it feels is unsupportable o
Page 62 and 63: 58 developed to fund local programs
Page 66 and 67: BACKGROUND Federal legislation requ
Page 68 and 69: D. Provision of pertinent certifica
Page 70 and 71: 1. Each local public agency within
Page 72 and 73: V. OFFICERS 68 i. The Chair of the
Page 74 and 75: B. The Chair and voting members (or
Page 76 and 77: Unified Planning Work Program 1. Th
Page 80 and 81: 76 • making information available
Page 82 and 83: Policy 3.2 Those plans and programs
Page 84 and 85: MPO website http://www.indympo.org/
Page 86 and 87: Contact Those seeking more informat
Page 88 and 89: APPENDIX D TITLE VI COMPLAINT PROCE
Page 90 and 91: III. Responsible Official The overa
Page 92 and 93: • If the allegations are not subs
Page 94 and 95: APPENDIX E INDIANAPOLIS MPO TRANSPO
Page 96 and 97: 92 • All applications that do not
Page 98 and 99:
CONTACT INFORMATION Comments or que
Page 100 and 101:
96 (this page intentionally left bl
Page 102 and 103:
Introduction The Indianapolis Metro
Page 104 and 105:
• telework/telecommuting programs
Page 106 and 107:
APPENDIX: CONGESTION MITIGATION & A
Page 108 and 109:
8. Transit Service Expansion Projec
Page 110 and 111:
1 B. Existing Roadway Capacity Impr
Page 112 and 113:
D. Roadway Reconstruction/Rehabilit
Page 114 and 115:
F. Bridge Replacement (100 points p
Page 116 and 117:
H. Intersection or Intersection Gro
Page 118 and 119:
J. Pedestrian Enhancement (100 poin
Page 120:
L. Transit Enhancement Capital Proj
show all

MPO Policy and Procedures Manual - Indianapolis Metropolitan ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?