Contents - Faculty of Law - University of Cambridge

More documents

Recommendations

Info

‘Open Book’ Papers. Where a paper has been designated as an ‘open book’ paper, candidates are permitted to takethe following materials into the examination: (i) any materials supplied in class by lecturers (e.g. handouts, problemquestions, and photocopied extracts from printed sources); (ii) any materials prepared by themselves, including materialphotocopied without breach of copyright (e.g. a student’s notes, photocopies of reported cases or published articles, orphotocopied extracts from published books which represent no more than 10% of the whole book, thereby complying withthe rules concerning copyright). Notices detailing the relevant rules concerning copyright are located adjacent to everyphotocopying machine in the Faculty Building; (iii) material specified in the Faculty’s notice on the ‘Use of Statutes andOther Materials’, which will be published in the Michaelmas Term (e.g. a statute or collection of statutes); (iv) a bilingualdictionary. Electronic dictionaries are not permitted.It is never permissible to take a textbook (or casebook) into an examination - a textbook will never be designated aspermitted material. Nor is it permissible in an ‘open book’ examination to use a photocopy of an entire textbook (to makesuch photocopy would amount to a breach of copyright).‘Closed Book’ Papers. Candidates are forbidden to take into any examination any materials other than those specified.Where materials are allowed, candidates must use their own unmarked copies. Subject to the proviso stated below, anyform of marking – including annotations, highlighting, circling and underlining – is prohibited. It is also forbidden to attachanything to or place anything within the permitted materials: this means, inter alia, that the use of tabs, post-it notes andstickers is prohibited. The proviso referred to above is that candidates may write their name and the name of theircollege on the inside front page of any permitted materials.In the event that a candidate's materials fail to comply with any of the requirements set out above, the Chair ofExaminers, the Examinations Secretary or the Examiner responsible for the conduct of the examination concerned willdecide whether to confiscate them. If annotated materials are confiscated, replacements will not be provided.Candidates who fail to comply with any of the requirements set out above should be aware of the possibility of disciplinaryproceedings as well as of the confiscation of materials.Candidates must bring their own copies of permitted materials to examinations; spare copies will not be available shouldcandidates forget to bring their own copies.In the case of materials produced by the Faculty, candidates will be permitted to use only the current year’s issue and noother. Such materials will be available from the Law Faculty Office and will be stamped ‘For use in Examinations in2011’.Prizes. The following prizes may be awarded each year for outstanding performance in the LLM Examination:The BRD Clarke Prize for the Best Overall PerformanceThe Chancellor’s Medal for English LawThe George Long Prize for JurisprudenceThe George Long Prize for Roman LawThe Clive Parry Prize for International LawThe Clive Parry Prize (Overseas) for International LawThe Clifford Chance C.J. Hamson Prize for Comparative LawThe Gareth Jones Prize for Restitution78
Chancellor’s Medal. The following papers have been designated for the purposes of the Chancellor’s Medal for EnglishLaws in 2010-2011:Paper 3. International Commercial LitigationPaper 4. The Law of RestitutionPaper 10. Corporate GovernancePaper 12. Intellectual PropertyPaper 26. Civil Liberties and Human RightsPaper 30. JurisprudencePaper 32. Commercial EquityPaper 33. Comparative Family Law and PolicyPaper 34. Philosophy of Criminal LawPaper 35. History of English Civil and Criminal LawPaper 38. The Faculty Board may in addition deem a thesis submitted for a seminar course under Paper 38 to be apaper in English Law and Legal History for this purpose.79
Page 2 and 3:
ContentsGeneral InformationOfficers
Page 4 and 5:
Settlement of International Dispute
Page 6 and 7:
Faculty AdministrationFaculty Offic
Page 8 and 9:
The Faculty of LawLaw has been stud
Page 10 and 11:
The LLM Degree. This degree is awar
Page 12 and 13:
Opening Hours:Full Term: Monday to
Page 14 and 15:
Rules Made by the Information Strat
Page 16 and 17:
The Lauterpacht Centre for Internat
Page 18 and 19:
Centre for Corporate and Commercial
Page 20 and 21:
Cambridge Socio-Legal GroupThe Camb
Page 26 and 27:
Dates of Faculty Board Meetings7 Oc
Page 28 and 29: Proceed with caution in reaching fo
Page 30 and 31: Faculty CommunicationEach year, the
Page 32 and 33: Law Tripos Part IA. A candidate for
Page 34 and 35: Prizes. The following prizes may be
Page 36 and 37: PAPER 2. CONSTITUTIONAL LAWA. The a
Page 38 and 39: Oliver, Constitutional Reform (2003
Page 40 and 41: Hedley, Tort (6th ed 2008)Weir, An
Page 42 and 43: 3. Trusts and co-ownership: Concurr
Page 44 and 45: Brownlie, Principles of Internation
Page 46 and 47: Elliott, Constitutional Foundations
Page 48 and 49: Contract: covenant and debt; assump
Page 50 and 51: Statutes:Blackstone’s Statutes on
Page 52 and 53: For reference:Birks and Pretto (ed)
Page 54 and 55: Foster, EU Legislation (2010-2011)B
Page 56 and 57: PAPER 42. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY1. I
Page 58 and 59: 2. Property torts (conversion and t
Page 60 and 61: (iii)Causation4. Contracts in Engla
Page 62 and 63: Rawls, Political LiberalismRawls, J
Page 64 and 65: Rodger and McCulloch, The UK Compet
Page 66 and 67: Law Commission, Renting Homes: The
Page 68 and 69: Human Rights Case DigestHuman Right
Page 70 and 71: 3. Title at common law and in equit
Page 72 and 73: Exemption from Professional Examina
Page 74 and 75: Paper application available to down
Page 76 and 77: Form of Examination and Designation
Page 80 and 81: LLM : Syllabuses and Lists of Recom
Page 82 and 83: ased upon one or two leading cases,
Page 84 and 85: Goff and Jones, The Law of Restitut
Page 86 and 87: Butterworths’ Company Law Handboo
Page 88 and 89: 2. The EU’s system for human righ
Page 90 and 91: the context of environmental protec
Page 92 and 93: European Competition Law Review (EC
Page 94 and 95: Crawford, The Treatment of Combatan
Page 96 and 97: Douglas, The International Law of I
Page 98 and 99: Unger, Free Trade Reimagined (2007)
Page 100 and 101: 3. Sceptics and Critics I4. Sceptic
Page 102 and 103: The course provides an opportunity
Page 104 and 105: (iv)(v)(vi)(vii)Is either utilitari
Page 106 and 107: Reiman, ‘Justice, Civilization, a
Page 108 and 109: Gardner, Introduction to the Law of
Page 110 and 111: 1. Types of theoretical analysis an
Page 112 and 113: 2. Specific fieldsTopics to be sele
Page 114 and 115: The LLM (one-year taught postgradua
Page 116 and 117: As part of the requirements for the
Page 118 and 119: Teaching Members of the Faculty of
Page 120 and 121: MC Elliott, MA, PhD (Cantab); St Ca
Page 122 and 123: RA Melikan, BA (Mich), JD, MA (Chi)
Page 124 and 125: BD Sloan, MA, LLM (Cantab); King’
Page 126 and 127: Law Teachers in the Department of L
Page 128 and 129:
Murray Edwards College. Dr S Turenn
show all

Contents - Faculty of Law - University of Cambridge

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?