State Route 6 Corridor Study Final Report - Cobb County Government

More documents

Recommendations

Info

State Route 6 Corridor Study Final Report Prepared for: Atlanta Regional Commission Prepared by: URS Corporation 1000 Abernathy Road, Suite 900 Atlanta, Georgia 30328 In Association with: Joel F. Stone, Jr. Inc. Market+Main Inc. Michael Ronkin PEQ: Planners for Environmental Quality Ralph Whitehead Associates Schapiro Research Group Urban Collage, Inc. URS Project Number: 1528‐0373 January 2008
Study Partners City of Powder Springs Cobb County Douglas County Fulton County Paulding County ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Stakeholder Advisory Committee Participant Organizations Chattahoochee Technical College City of Austell City of College Park City of College Park Economic Development City of College Park Public Works City of East Point City of East Point Residents City of Hiram Cobb Chamber of Commerce Cobb County Community Development Douglas County Chamber of Commerce Duke Realty Corporation Fulton Industrial District Georgia International Convention Center Georgian Bank Hartsfield‐Jackson Atlanta International Airport Hartsfield Area Transportation Management Association Kroger Store Livable Communities Coalition MARTA Paulding Chamber of Commerce Paulding County Resident Sandtown Association South Fulton Chamber of Commerce South West Austell Neighbor Agencies Atlanta Regional Commission Georgia Department of Transportation Georgia Regional Transportation Authority Final Report January 2008
Page 1: State Route 6 Corridor Study Final
Page 5 and 6: List of Figures Figure 1‐1: SR 6
Page 7 and 8: STUDY AREA MAP PAULDING DOUGLAS COW
Page 9 and 10: Public Involvement Plan. Innovative
Page 11 and 12: 1.2.3 Public Engagement Activities
Page 13 and 14: Table 1‐2: Stakeholder and Leader
Page 15 and 16: 2.0 SR 6 Corridor Overview In the S
Page 17 and 18: type and style around Camp Creek Ma
Page 19 and 20: was 171,700, increasing by 57 perce
Page 21 and 22: The Norfolk Southern Whitaker Inter
Page 23 and 24: principles: environmental protectio
Page 25 and 26: Related to transit, a need for impr
Page 27 and 28: Tables 3‐1 and 3‐2 list both th
Page 29 and 30: Table 3-1: ARC Envision6 RTP Planne
Page 31 and 32: Table 3-1: ARC Envision6 RTP Planne
Page 33 and 34: 3.2 Transportation Recommendations
Page 35 and 36: STUDY AREA MAP PAULDING DOUGLAS COW
Page 37 and 38: oadway system should be evaluated t
Page 39 and 40: Figure 3‐3: Proposed Typical Sect
Page 41 and 42: Figure 3‐4: Roadway with Rain Gar
Page 43 and 44: � Conduct a corridor‐wide traff
Page 45 and 46: onto state facilities are specified
Page 47 and 48: majority of the crashes at this int
Page 49 and 50: and includes two signals on opposit
Page 51 and 52: • For the properties located at t
Page 53 and 54:
� Implement planned transit servi
Page 55 and 56:
provide this infrastructure directl
Page 57 and 58:
• Greater promotion of park and r
Page 59:
Approaching the future of SR 6 usin
Page 63 and 64:
• Inform and involve the public i
Page 65 and 66:
• Advances sustainable developmen
Page 67 and 68:
Additional LEED information and sus
Page 69 and 70:
• Direct acquisition - Direct acq
Page 71 and 72:
Legend: Land Use Land Use - Powder
Page 73 and 74:
Legend: Land Use Residential Commer
Page 75 and 76:
its dedicated transit system form a
Page 77 and 78:
Table 4‐2: Envision6 Planned and
Page 79 and 80:
Table 4-3: Estimated Costs for Reco
Page 81 and 82:
Table 4‐4: Potential Funding Sour
Page 83 and 84:
Coordinated multijurisdictional pro
Page 85 and 86:
Appendix A: Public Outreach Documen
show all

State Route 6 Corridor Study Final Report - Cobb County Government

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?