18.11.2012 Views

State Route 6 Corridor Study Final Report - Cobb County Government

State Route 6 Corridor Study Final Report - Cobb County Government

State Route 6 Corridor Study Final Report - Cobb County Government

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.0 SR 6 <strong>Corridor</strong> Recommendations<br />

The SR 6 <strong>Corridor</strong> <strong>Study</strong> recommendations include specific projects and broad<br />

strategies or policies for future implementation. Both transportation and land use<br />

recommendations have been developed. The study’s horizon is year 2030. Projects<br />

presented in this section include existing projects in the ARC Envision6 RTP and newly<br />

identified projects generated through the SR 6 needs assessment and project<br />

identification process.<br />

The types of transportation projects fall into the following categories: roadway capacity,<br />

roadway operations, freight, transit, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Factors<br />

considered during recommendations development include:<br />

• ARC Regional plans and policies;<br />

• <strong>Study</strong> goals and objectives;<br />

• Data analysis and technical considerations;<br />

• Jurisdictional plans;<br />

• Input and guidance from the participating county, municipalities, and planning<br />

partners;<br />

• Public and community input; and<br />

• Balance of needs and resources.<br />

To ensure that the SR 6 <strong>Corridor</strong> <strong>Study</strong> recommendations are comprehensive and reflect<br />

community and regional needs, outreach with planning partners, stakeholders, and the<br />

general public were undertaken to refine the proposed alternatives, as discussed in<br />

Section 2. Based on input received through this process, proposed transportation and<br />

land use alternatives were refined to result in the draft recommendations. In some<br />

instances the corridor jurisdictions may have institutional, legislative, or regulatory<br />

concerns that should be considered prior to adopting these recommendations.<br />

3.1 ARC Planned and Programmed Projects<br />

The regional Envision6 RTP was adopted September 26, 2007. The SR 6 <strong>Corridor</strong> <strong>Study</strong><br />

was conducted as ARC was updating the Region’s long range transportation plan<br />

(LRTP) from Mobility 2030 to Envision6. Planned and programmed projects that are<br />

within or adjacent to the study area from both LRTPs were considered during the needs<br />

assessment and alternatives identification process. A critical factor in the Envison6 RTP<br />

was that some projects that had previously been included in the Mobility 2030 RTP were<br />

eliminated due to a lack of funding.<br />

<strong>Final</strong> <strong>Report</strong> 3‐1<br />

January 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!