State Route 6 Corridor Study Final Report - Cobb County Government
State Route 6 Corridor Study Final Report - Cobb County Government
State Route 6 Corridor Study Final Report - Cobb County Government
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3.0 SR 6 <strong>Corridor</strong> Recommendations<br />
The SR 6 <strong>Corridor</strong> <strong>Study</strong> recommendations include specific projects and broad<br />
strategies or policies for future implementation. Both transportation and land use<br />
recommendations have been developed. The study’s horizon is year 2030. Projects<br />
presented in this section include existing projects in the ARC Envision6 RTP and newly<br />
identified projects generated through the SR 6 needs assessment and project<br />
identification process.<br />
The types of transportation projects fall into the following categories: roadway capacity,<br />
roadway operations, freight, transit, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Factors<br />
considered during recommendations development include:<br />
• ARC Regional plans and policies;<br />
• <strong>Study</strong> goals and objectives;<br />
• Data analysis and technical considerations;<br />
• Jurisdictional plans;<br />
• Input and guidance from the participating county, municipalities, and planning<br />
partners;<br />
• Public and community input; and<br />
• Balance of needs and resources.<br />
To ensure that the SR 6 <strong>Corridor</strong> <strong>Study</strong> recommendations are comprehensive and reflect<br />
community and regional needs, outreach with planning partners, stakeholders, and the<br />
general public were undertaken to refine the proposed alternatives, as discussed in<br />
Section 2. Based on input received through this process, proposed transportation and<br />
land use alternatives were refined to result in the draft recommendations. In some<br />
instances the corridor jurisdictions may have institutional, legislative, or regulatory<br />
concerns that should be considered prior to adopting these recommendations.<br />
3.1 ARC Planned and Programmed Projects<br />
The regional Envision6 RTP was adopted September 26, 2007. The SR 6 <strong>Corridor</strong> <strong>Study</strong><br />
was conducted as ARC was updating the Region’s long range transportation plan<br />
(LRTP) from Mobility 2030 to Envision6. Planned and programmed projects that are<br />
within or adjacent to the study area from both LRTPs were considered during the needs<br />
assessment and alternatives identification process. A critical factor in the Envison6 RTP<br />
was that some projects that had previously been included in the Mobility 2030 RTP were<br />
eliminated due to a lack of funding.<br />
<strong>Final</strong> <strong>Report</strong> 3‐1<br />
January 2008