18.11.2012 Views

2009 Issue 1 - Raytheon

2009 Issue 1 - Raytheon

2009 Issue 1 - Raytheon

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cossor company together with fate.<br />

Experiments in 1935, which included A.C.<br />

Cossor personnel, proved that radio waves<br />

could be “bounced” off aircraft and the<br />

“echo” picked up and interpreted by a<br />

receiving station to determine the bearing<br />

and distance of the aircraft. The secret<br />

technology was the RAdio Detection And<br />

Ranging system, a device more commonly<br />

known today by its acronym … RADAR.<br />

A.C. Cossor was selected by the Air<br />

Ministry to build the critical receiving units<br />

and operator displays that made Britain’s<br />

“Chain Home” air defense radar network<br />

usable and the first operational radar system<br />

in the world. At the onset of the Battle<br />

of Britain, Chain Home included 19 transmitter<br />

and receiving stations, providing a<br />

protective umbrella from the Shetlands to<br />

Lands End. With Chain Home, the Royal Air<br />

Force had a precious 20-minutes warning<br />

to deny the German Luftwaffe the element<br />

of surprise and scramble fighter squadrons<br />

to form “welcoming committees” for their<br />

uninvited visitors.<br />

1940s: Mass-producing Magnetrons<br />

Born from necessity, the World War II years<br />

were a period of tremendous innovation,<br />

spawning technological changes that continue<br />

to reverberate into the 21st century.<br />

One of <strong>Raytheon</strong>’s first innovations of the<br />

1940s would significantly improve the capability<br />

of radar to detect enemy planes.<br />

Laminated magnetron anode with cooling<br />

fins, early WWII<br />

In 1940, British scientists brought their new<br />

magnetron tube — a device for producing<br />

high-power microwaves used in radar protecting<br />

their country’s coastline — to the<br />

United States. They hoped to draw on<br />

Americans’ manufacturing ingenuity and<br />

find a better process for producing these<br />

magnetrons.<br />

The visiting scientists had planned meetings<br />

with industry leaders in microwaves —<br />

General Electric, Westinghouse and Bell<br />

Labs; all were dabbling in lower power<br />

radar work.<br />

Dr. Edward L. Bowles of the Massachusetts<br />

Institute of Technology’s Radiation Lab recommended<br />

that the British bring their magnetron<br />

to <strong>Raytheon</strong>. “It is not good to give<br />

a large company an exclusive … It should<br />

always be pitted against a smaller one.<br />

Small firms are mobile, and can be quick in<br />

an emergency,” Bowles later wrote.<br />

The cavity fabrication was a complex<br />

machining operation from four-inch copper<br />

bar that required skilled labor and many<br />

hours to produce, with an output of only<br />

several magnetrons per week. Percy<br />

Spencer wrote of that Friday afternoon<br />

meeting, “The technique for making these<br />

tubes, as described to us, was awkward<br />

and impractical.” After asking, and then<br />

arguing, to take the highly secret device<br />

home for the weekend, Spencer began to<br />

ponder the problem. A man with no formal<br />

education, he had many past successes<br />

improving radio tubes.<br />

Monday morning Spencer came in with a<br />

simple solution: To make the cavity from<br />

multiple stamped 1/8-inch sheet metal copper<br />

plates, stack them in a fixture with silver<br />

solder layers in between, and finish the<br />

process in a hydrogen brazing oven. The<br />

thermal properties of the stacking fixture<br />

would expand faster than the copper and<br />

lock them into conformity.<br />

This was a tremendous breakthrough for<br />

British radar production. Because this technique<br />

employed two mass production<br />

processes, “Out were coming magnetrons<br />

Legacy of Innovation<br />

like sausage!” said Charles F. Adams, president<br />

of <strong>Raytheon</strong> from 1948 to 1950.<br />

<strong>Raytheon</strong> received the contract in 1941 and<br />

was soon producing an astonishing 2,600<br />

magnetrons per week.<br />

Before long, <strong>Raytheon</strong> would be producing<br />

80 percent of the U.S. and free world’s<br />

magnetrons. For his work, Spencer received<br />

the Distinguished Public Service Award, the<br />

U.S. Navy’s highest award for excellence.<br />

1940s: Developing Subminiature Tubes<br />

for the Proximity Fuse<br />

<strong>Raytheon</strong> did not invent the highly accurate<br />

fuse using radio waves to trigger a<br />

time at distance detonation. However, in<br />

1945 the company perfected the integral<br />

subminiature tubes to survive the harsh<br />

environment of acceleration force 20,000<br />

times stronger than Earth’s gravity and a<br />

centrifugal force set up by approximately<br />

500 rotations per second until the projectile<br />

reached its target.<br />

Subminiature tubes<br />

Many scientists did not want to use the fuse<br />

because if it was captured by the enemy, it<br />

could be used against the Allied Powers. It<br />

was so secret it was considered “fantastic<br />

secret” — higher than top secret during the<br />

war because of its scientific importance.<br />

Years before the fuse was put into use,<br />

Spencer had been working to add radio<br />

controls to an airplane model for his son.<br />

Using several types of receiving tubes and a<br />

heavy battery, it could not get off the<br />

ground. So he was already miniaturizing<br />

tubes that use lower power.<br />

Continued on page 30<br />

RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGY TODAY <strong>2009</strong> ISSUE 1 29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!