18.11.2012 Views

Raytheon Technology Today 2011 Issue 1

Raytheon Technology Today 2011 Issue 1

Raytheon Technology Today 2011 Issue 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Building Tomorrow’s Energy Surety<br />

With <strong>Today</strong>’s Technologies<br />

Energy surety is an approach to an<br />

“ideal” energy system that, when fulfilled,<br />

enables the system to function<br />

properly while allowing it to resist stresses<br />

that could result in unacceptable losses. The<br />

attributes of the energy surety model include<br />

safety, security, reliability, recoverability and<br />

sustainability.<br />

Numerous existing and emerging electrical<br />

power generation and energy storage technologies<br />

may be employed to address the needs<br />

and objectives of U.S. Department of<br />

Defense (DoD) and other domestic and international<br />

customers. Maintaining energy surety<br />

throughout a system’s life cycle requires the<br />

identification, analysis and integration of the<br />

right energy technologies, while considering<br />

specific applications and environments.<br />

<strong>Raytheon</strong> accomplishes this by leveraging its<br />

expertise and resources in system architecture,<br />

design and integration; command and control;<br />

communications; cybersecurity; critical<br />

infrastructure protection; weather prediction;<br />

and modeling and simulation (M&S).<br />

Full Life-cycle Approach<br />

The system solution is developed and matured<br />

throughout the three primary stages<br />

Topology/<br />

weather analysis<br />

Vulnerability<br />

analysis<br />

Concept Stage<br />

• Requirements<br />

derivation<br />

• Tech budgets<br />

• Gov’t mandates<br />

Cost benefit analysis<br />

<strong>Technology</strong> assessment<br />

Configuration<br />

trades<br />

in the energy solutions life cycle — concept,<br />

implementation and maintenance — as<br />

illustrated in Figure 1.<br />

During the concept stage, understanding<br />

the requirements, performing analysis of<br />

alternatives (AoA), cost benefit trades, and<br />

vulnerability analyses result in cost-effective<br />

solutions that meet user needs and are<br />

resilient to enemy attack. Early planning<br />

addresses the strategic concerns related to<br />

the architecture and deployment of a new<br />

initiative or mission and considers policy<br />

constraints, resource availability, personnel<br />

safety, target environment topology and<br />

weather characteristics, vulnerability and<br />

cost. AoA supports the planning process<br />

through rigorous trade-offs of operational<br />

approaches, technology configurations,<br />

cost-schedule-technology risks, and threats.<br />

Finally, architecture definition, modeling,<br />

simulation and systems analysis provide the<br />

foundation for design and implementation<br />

efforts and provide predictions of how —<br />

and how well — the system will operate<br />

once it is implemented. Some of these early<br />

analyses address the approach, effectiveness<br />

and costs of maintenance to ensure that the<br />

architecture and operational approach can<br />

Figure 1. The comprehensive system solution is matured throughout the energy solutions life cycle.<br />

EPA<br />

Deploy/install Design<br />

Feature<br />

be adequately supported and upgraded.<br />

This early total system analysis and architecture<br />

definition yields dividends during the<br />

implementation and maintenance stages by<br />

reducing the costs of operation, maintenance<br />

and upgrades.<br />

The implementation stage continues with<br />

detailed planning and design trade-offs that<br />

focus on installation performance, testability<br />

and supportability. Specific system and<br />

technology choices are made and a detailed<br />

deployment cost and schedule plan is created.<br />

All stakeholders are involved, and service-level<br />

agreement contracts are created and signed.<br />

System engineering, power systems design,<br />

supply chain and contracts management<br />

are critical during this and the maintenance<br />

stage. Proper analysis and selection in this<br />

phase reduces operational costs and improves<br />

system availability, enhancing energy surety<br />

and reducing the required frequency and cost<br />

of future upgrades.<br />

In the maintenance stage, the choices made<br />

during the concept and implementation<br />

stages are evaluated and evolved to support<br />

normal and peak operations. Power<br />

Implementation Stage Maintenance Stage<br />

Solution<br />

laydown<br />

Tech maturity<br />

and obsolescence<br />

Integrator Concept Integrator Baseline Integrator<br />

Contracts Procurement<br />

Cost and<br />

schedule<br />

Stakeholder coordination<br />

Maintenance<br />

Continued on page 8<br />

Evaluate &<br />

Improve Plan<br />

Growth and upgrades<br />

<strong>Technology</strong><br />

road map<br />

M&S/data from estimates and “as likes” Mature models through data gathering Cost benefit for planned upgrades<br />

$<br />

Implement<br />

RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGY TODAY <strong>2011</strong> ISSUE 1 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!