10.07.2015 Views

DOWNLOAD MY Ph.D Thesis - UNAM

DOWNLOAD MY Ph.D Thesis - UNAM

DOWNLOAD MY Ph.D Thesis - UNAM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 6Optimisation of CRA using adaptive CSAs pOn high traffic loads, with this enhanced CSA only the contention slots needed toresolve the collisions are sent, allocating on average from 2.821 to 2.783 per request(according to the current traffic load), as shown in Figure 6.8, optimising further thebandwidth to be allocated to the reservation and contention-based access regions. InAverage umber of ContentionSlots per Request4.54.3Simple-CSA (CSs_3)Simple-CSA (CSs_5)4.1Forced-CSA (FSs_2,CSs_2)3.9Forced-CSA (FSs_2,CSs_3)V ariable-CSA -(CSs_2)3.7V ariable-CSA -(CSs_3)3.53.33.13 M bps Ups tream32 kbps Kbps IP IP &&2.99.7 kbps Kbps VoIPBackoff CRA2.729 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40umbe r of Active StationsFigure 6.8 – Average No. of CSs per reservation request vs. No. of active stations.Exponential backoff algorithm with varying CSA applied.Mean Access Delay (ms)1000900800700600500400300200Simple-CSA(CSs-3)Simple-CSA(CSs-5)Forced-CSA(FSs-2,CSs-2)Forced-CSA(FSs-2,CSs-3)Variable-CSA(CSs-2)Variable-CSA(CSs-3)3 Mbps Upstream32 Kbps kbps IP IP &9.7 Kbps kbps VoIPBackoff CRA100031 32 33 34 35umber of Active StationsFigure 6. 9 – Mean access delay vs. No. of active stations.Exponential backoff algorithm with varying CSA applied.6-15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!