- Page 1 and 2: Foreword by W. Wallace CovingtonEdi
- Page 3 and 4: ContentsACKNOWLEDGMENTSFOREWORDW. W
- Page 5 and 6: 5ForewordW. Wallace CovingtonThe dr
- Page 7 and 8: 7f Created and maintained an estima
- Page 9 and 10: 9IntroductionDave EganCollaborative
- Page 11 and 12: This handbook is designed to help t
- Page 13 and 14: 13fffffunds must primarily be used
- Page 15 and 16: 15Indian paintbrush (Castilleja kai
- Page 17 and 18: 17fffPotential threats to the healt
- Page 19 and 20: levels (i.e., within the historic/n
- Page 21 and 22: 21based reality”) that can be use
- Page 23 and 24: 23structural components and procedu
- Page 25 and 26: 25ffCycles/Patterns: Generally slow
- Page 27 and 28: make the project sustainable for th
- Page 29 and 30: Personal PerspectiveAs individuals,
- Page 31 and 32: 31Realist: Uses empiricism and indu
- Page 33 and 34: 33ReferencesAnderson, M.K. 2006. Te
- Page 35 and 36: U.S. Forest Service. 2011. U.S. For
- Page 37 and 38: 37These effortsfound support in anu
- Page 39 and 40: 39across large geographic areas, wh
- Page 41 and 42: 41Members of the stakeholder group
- Page 43 and 44: 43Barriers to Successful Collaborat
- Page 45 and 46: 45Conflicting Science and Interpret
- Page 47 and 48: 47organizations or members of the p
- Page 49: 49informal discussion, and sharing
- Page 53 and 54: 53collaboration can be managed and
- Page 55 and 56: 55ReferencesBouwen, R. and T. Taill
- Page 57 and 58: Chapter2Ecological EconomicsEvan E.
- Page 59 and 60: 59The San Francisco Peaks jut out b
- Page 61 and 62: 61Incentives for leveraging additio
- Page 63 and 64: 63Appropriations for CFLRP projects
- Page 65 and 66: 65f Much of the labor income and em
- Page 67 and 68: 67major initial costs that are incu
- Page 69 and 70: 69Paying for RestorationGiven the s
- Page 71 and 72: 71for both cities were degraded res
- Page 73 and 74: 73ffffLack of complete social accep
- Page 75 and 76: 75ffin affected rural communities t
- Page 77 and 78: 77ConclusionCollaborative landscape
- Page 79 and 80: Fulé, P. Z., J. E. Crouse, J. P. R
- Page 81 and 82: 81Rideout, D.B. and P.S. Ziesler. 2
- Page 83 and 84: These requirements create a formida
- Page 85 and 86: 85One Possible SolutionProfessional
- Page 87 and 88: 87resource conditions; 2) the infor
- Page 89 and 90: 89Former ERI Outreach Coordinator C
- Page 91 and 92: In order for planners to achieve a
- Page 93 and 94: for the project area, all data poin
- Page 95 and 96: 95Identify Desired Conditions, Comp
- Page 97 and 98: 97Once the resource surveys and oth
- Page 99 and 100: Purpose and Need StatementThe purpo
- Page 101 and 102:
101resource condition or effects th
- Page 103 and 104:
103in acre-feet (watershed), change
- Page 105 and 106:
105Another USFS directive, Climate
- Page 107 and 108:
107ReferencesFleischman, F. 2008. B
- Page 109 and 110:
109Members of the Uncompahgre Plate
- Page 111 and 112:
111Compliance monitoring (also know
- Page 113 and 114:
As part of any long-term monitoring
- Page 115 and 116:
115working people in the proper pos
- Page 117 and 118:
117In addition to the lead person,
- Page 119 and 120:
Measurable: Since monitoring is all
- Page 121 and 122:
121(Top) Plot data is collected by
- Page 123 and 124:
123Nevertheless, a collaborative sh
- Page 125 and 126:
125does not pose a threat to commun
- Page 127 and 128:
127Adaptive ManagementAdaptive mana
- Page 129 and 130:
129uneven presentations may lead to
- Page 131 and 132:
Deschutes Collaborative Forest Proj
- Page 133 and 134:
68,000 acres of the project and the
- Page 135 and 136:
135White MountainStewardship Contra
- Page 137 and 138:
137White MountainStewardship Contra
- Page 139 and 140:
139ReferencesCaughlan, L. and K.L.
- Page 141 and 142:
National Forest Foundation. CFLRP N
- Page 143 and 144:
143Planning: Initiating theImplemen
- Page 145 and 146:
145correctly, the contract brings t
- Page 147 and 148:
147Stewardship contracting does, ho
- Page 149 and 150:
149contracting and traditional timb
- Page 151 and 152:
151and pay the purchaser when the w
- Page 153 and 154:
ing individual trees. The descripti
- Page 155 and 156:
155evaluate a number of factorsincl
- Page 157 and 158:
157delimber-debarker can produce cl
- Page 159 and 160:
159site hydrology, and restore the
- Page 161 and 162:
161ReferencesLowe, K. 2005. Restori
- Page 163 and 164:
Chapter6Adaptive ManagementDana Coe
- Page 165 and 166:
165cies as experiments (Holling 197
- Page 167 and 168:
167Feedback MechanismsMonitoring mu
- Page 169 and 170:
169Botanists collect understory dat
- Page 171 and 172:
ment strategy, active AM uses model
- Page 173 and 174:
173Examples in the Collaborative Fo
- Page 175 and 176:
175broader Crown of the Continent e
- Page 177 and 178:
177The SWCC also has one of the onl
- Page 179 and 180:
179related to the collection, analy
- Page 181 and 182:
181A high school student takes tree
- Page 183 and 184:
183Bridges to Effective Adaptive Ma
- Page 185 and 186:
185ffable documents (e.g., a Record
- Page 187 and 188:
___. 2008. Data gaps in natural res
- Page 189 and 190:
189Lyons, J.E., M.C. Runge, H.P. La
- Page 191 and 192:
ConclusionAmy E.M. WaltzThis handbo
- Page 193 and 194:
193ftime. These planning costs for
- Page 195 and 196:
195About the ContributorsDAVE BREWE
- Page 197 and 198:
197power dynamics in collaborative
- Page 199 and 200:
Books, Book Chapters, and ReportsAr
- Page 201 and 202:
201GlossaryAdaptive management: An
- Page 203 and 204:
203Disturbance: A discrete event or
- Page 205 and 206:
205Forest: In general, an area or b
- Page 207 and 208:
207Multi-party monitoring: A proces
- Page 209 and 210:
209Planning committees and advisory
- Page 211 and 212:
211Stratification system: A methodo