14Recently, Shaver, Wu, <strong>and</strong> Schwartz (1991) interviewed young people inAmerica, Italy, <strong>and</strong> the People’s Republic of China about their emotional experiences.They found that Americans <strong>and</strong> Italians tended to equate love with happiness <strong>and</strong> toassume that both passionate <strong>and</strong> companionate love were intensely positive experiences.Students in Beijing, China, possessed a darker view of love. In the Chinese language,there are few “happy-love” words; love is associated with sadness. Not surprisingly,then, the Chinese men <strong>and</strong> women interviewed by Shaver <strong>and</strong> his colleagues tended toassociate passionate love with such ideographic words as infatuation, unrequited love,nostalgia, <strong>and</strong> sorrow love.Other cultural researchers agree that cultural values may, indeed, have a profoundimpact on the subtle shadings of meaning assigned to the construct of “love.” (Cohen, inpress; Kim & <strong>Hatfield</strong>, 2004; Kitayama, 2002; Luciano, E. M. C., 2003; Nisbet, 2003;Oyserman, Kemmelmeier, & Coon, 2002; Weaver & Ganong, 2004.)There is, however, considerable debate as to how ubiquitous <strong>and</strong> how importantsuch differences are. When social psychologists explored folk conceptions of love in asurprising variety of cultures—including the People’s Republic of China, Indonesia,Micronesia, Palau, <strong>and</strong> Turkey, —they found that people in the various culturespossessed surprisingly similar views of love <strong>and</strong> other “feelings of the heart” (seeFischer, Wang, Kennedy, & Cheng, 1998; Jankowiak, 1995; Kim <strong>and</strong> <strong>Hatfield</strong>, 2004;Shaver, Murdaya, & Fraley, 2001, for a review of this research.) In a typical study, forexample, Shaver, Murdaya, <strong>and</strong> Fraley (2001) argued that love <strong>and</strong> “sexual mating,reproduction, parenting, <strong>and</strong> maintaining relationships with kin <strong>and</strong> reciprocally altruisticrelationships with friends <strong>and</strong> neighbors are fundamental issues for humans (p. 219-220.)
15To test the notion that passionate <strong>and</strong> companionate love are cultural universals, theyconducted a “prototype” study to (1) determine what Indonesian (as compared toAmerican) men <strong>and</strong> women considered to be “basic” emotions, <strong>and</strong> (2) the meaning theyascribed to these emotions. Starting with 404 Indonesian “perasaan hati” (Emotionnames or “feelings of the heart,”) they asked people to sort the words into basic emotioncategories. As predicted, the Indonesians came up with the same five emotions thatAmericans consider to be basic: joy, love, sadness, fear, <strong>and</strong> anger. Furthermore, whenasked about the meanings of “love,” Indonesian men <strong>and</strong> women (like their Americancounterparts) were able to distinguish passionate love (“asmara,” orsexual/desire/arousal) from companionate love (“cinta” or affection/liking/fondness.)There were some differences in the American <strong>and</strong> Indonesian lexicons, however. Theauthors note:The Indonesian conception of love may place more emphasis on yearning<strong>and</strong> desire than the American conception, perhaps because the barriers toconsummation are more formidable in Indonesia, which is a moretraditional <strong>and</strong> mostly Muslin country. (p. 219.)Much more research needs to be done, of course, before scientists can state thisconclusion with any certainty.Perhaps love is, indeed, a cultural universal. Or perhaps the times they are ‘achanging. One impact of globalization (<strong>and</strong> the ubiquitous MTV, Hollywood <strong>and</strong>Bollywoood movies, chat rooms, <strong>and</strong> foreign travel) may be to ensure that when peoplespeak of “passionate love,” they are talking about much the same thing.B. What Men <strong>and</strong> Women <strong>Desire</strong> in Romantic Partners
- Page 1 and 2: 78. Hatfield, E., Rapson, R. L.. &
- Page 3 and 4: 3of neural activation (see Bartels
- Page 5 and 6: 5After observing many kinds of prim
- Page 7 and 8: 7someone, there is less need to ass
- Page 9 and 10: 9mutability of human behavior. They
- Page 11 and 12: 11evidenced in the availability of
- Page 13: 13Chu (1985; Chu & Ju, 1993), too,
- Page 17 and 18: 17preferences. He found that for so
- Page 19 and 20: 19. . . everybody knows that love c
- Page 21 and 22: 211980). Families might also consul
- Page 23 and 24: 23fact they do not. Joseph and Jose
- Page 25 and 26: 25To test this notion, Sprecher and
- Page 28 and 29: 28jealousy's pangs. She observed:
- Page 30 and 31: 30cuckold should fail to detect the
- Page 32 and 33: 32sure, but stories none-the-less.
- Page 34 and 35: 34The Toda of Southern India, who w
- Page 36 and 37: 36extreme jealousy) and the Toda tr
- Page 38 and 39: 38women were “supposed” to resp
- Page 40 and 41: 40This treatment of an unfaithful w
- Page 42 and 43: 42Naturally, cultural differences s
- Page 44 and 45: 44Bringle, R. G., & Buunk, B. (1986
- Page 46 and 47: 46Dion, K. K. & Dion, K. L. (1993).
- Page 48 and 49: 48Hatfield, E. & Rapson, R. L. (198
- Page 50 and 51: 50Kitayama, S. (2002.) Culture and
- Page 52 and 53: 52Prakasa, V. V., & Rao, V. N. (197
- Page 54 and 55: 54Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Triangul