40This treatment of an unfaithful wife was conventional <strong>and</strong> neither herparents nor the tribe did anything about it (Hilger, 1952, p. 212).The king of the Plateau tribes of Zimbabwe executed men caught with any of hiswives. The wives were grossly mutilated (Gouldsbury & Sheane, 1911). In earliertimes, Apache husb<strong>and</strong>s also killed their rivals <strong>and</strong> mutilated their wives (by cutting offthe end of their noses); presumably that made them less appealing the next time(Goodwin, 1942).In Western cultures, men are far more likely to beat or murder their girlfriends<strong>and</strong> wives than their rivals (White & Mullen, 1989). Today, In America, family peacecenters report that about two-thirds of the wives who are forced to seek shelter, do sobecause their husb<strong>and</strong>s' excessive or unwarranted jealousy has led them to repeatedlyassault the women (Gayford, 1979). Male jealousy is the leading cause of wifebattering <strong>and</strong> homicide worldwide (Buss, 1994; Daly & Wilson, 1988a, 1988b.In the West, until recently, such vengeance was approved or treated leniently untilrecently. The 18 th century English jurist Blackstone commented that killing in asituation where a man or woman is caught in the act “is of the lowest degree ofmanslaughter; . . . for there could not be a greater provocation” (quoted in Smith &Hogan, 1983, p. 288).In many countries, the courts have been sympathetic to such “crimes of passion.”Traditionally, it was considered to be a man’s right to defend his “honor.” In Morocco,for example, the law excuses killing one's wife if she is caught in the act of adultery,but a woman would not be excused for killing her husb<strong>and</strong> in the same circumstances(Greenhouse, 1994). In Sao Paulo (Brazil's most populous city), in 1980-1981, 722
41men claimed “defense of honor” for murdering their wives. Brazilian women adoptedthe slogan “<strong>Love</strong>rs don't kill,” <strong>and</strong> campaigned against allowing such a defense inmurder trials. Once again, we see that worldwide, the times they are a’ changing (seeBrooke, 1991, for a discussion of the changes globalization has brought to views of“honor” <strong>and</strong> crimes of violence in one culture—Brazil,VIII. In ConclusionThe preceding studies, then, suggest that the large differences that once existedbetween Westernized, modern, urban, industrial societies <strong>and</strong> Eastern, modern, urbanindustrial societies may be fast disappearing. Those interested in cross-culturaldifferences may be forced to search for large differences in only the mostunderdeveloped, developing, <strong>and</strong> collectivist of societies—such as in Africa or LatinAmerica, in China or the Arab countries (Egypt, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Saudi-Arabia,Iraq, or the U. A. E.).However, it may well be that, even there, the winds of Westernization,individualism, <strong>and</strong> social change are blowing. In spite of the censure of their elders, in avariety of traditional cultures, young people are increasingly adopting “Western”patterns—placing a high value on “falling in love,” pressing for gender equality in love<strong>and</strong> sex, <strong>and</strong> insisting on marrying for love (as opposed to arranged marriages.) Suchchanges have been documented in Finl<strong>and</strong>, Estonia, <strong>and</strong> Russia (Haavio-Mannila &Kontula, 2003) as well as among an Australian aboriginal peoples of Mangrove <strong>and</strong> aCopper Inuit Alaskan Indian tribe (see Jankowiak, 1995, for an extensive review of thisresearch.)
- Page 1 and 2: 78. Hatfield, E., Rapson, R. L.. &
- Page 3 and 4: 3of neural activation (see Bartels
- Page 5 and 6: 5After observing many kinds of prim
- Page 7 and 8: 7someone, there is less need to ass
- Page 9 and 10: 9mutability of human behavior. They
- Page 11 and 12: 11evidenced in the availability of
- Page 13 and 14: 13Chu (1985; Chu & Ju, 1993), too,
- Page 15 and 16: 15To test the notion that passionat
- Page 17 and 18: 17preferences. He found that for so
- Page 19 and 20: 19. . . everybody knows that love c
- Page 21 and 22: 211980). Families might also consul
- Page 23 and 24: 23fact they do not. Joseph and Jose
- Page 25 and 26: 25To test this notion, Sprecher and
- Page 28 and 29: 28jealousy's pangs. She observed:
- Page 30 and 31: 30cuckold should fail to detect the
- Page 32 and 33: 32sure, but stories none-the-less.
- Page 34 and 35: 34The Toda of Southern India, who w
- Page 36 and 37: 36extreme jealousy) and the Toda tr
- Page 38 and 39: 38women were “supposed” to resp
- Page 42 and 43: 42Naturally, cultural differences s
- Page 44 and 45: 44Bringle, R. G., & Buunk, B. (1986
- Page 46 and 47: 46Dion, K. K. & Dion, K. L. (1993).
- Page 48 and 49: 48Hatfield, E. & Rapson, R. L. (198
- Page 50 and 51: 50Kitayama, S. (2002.) Culture and
- Page 52 and 53: 52Prakasa, V. V., & Rao, V. N. (197
- Page 54 and 55: 54Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Triangul