Contempt Litigation 159with 20 civil proceedings instituted in fiscal year 1987. The casesinstituted in fiscal year <strong>1988</strong> included three motions for assessmentof fmes, 5 two motions for writs of body attachment, 4 andthree proceedings in which both fmes and body attachment weresought. 5 A total of 16 contempt or equivalent adjudications wereawarded in favor of the <strong>Board</strong>, 5 including 3 in which complianceonment of company president for willfully engaging in the foregoing conduct in violation of the judgmentof August 26, 1986).3 NLRB v. Mattiace Petrochemical Co, et al., in Nos. 86-4105 and 79-4029 (2d Cir.); NLRB a ServiceEmployees Local 73, in Nos. 79-1281, 79-1706, 79-1715, 79-2193 (7th Cir.); NLRB N PhiladelphiaBuilding Trades Council, in No. 85-3418 (3d Or.).4 NLRB v. Fancy Trims, <strong>In</strong>c., et al., in No. 85-4016 (2d Cir.); NLRB v. John Mahoney ConstructionCo., in No. 85-1607 (1st Or.).5 NLRB v. Arnold Cleaners, in No. 86-5758 (6th Or.); NLRB v. WBKB-TV Channel 11, et al., inNo. 85-5871 (6th Cir.); NLRB v. Iron Workers Local 15 Joint Apprenticeship Committee, in Nos. 86-4060, 86-4080 (2d Or.).6 NLRB v. Newspaper & Mail Deliverers, et al., in No. 86-4004 (2d Or.) (order of October 1, 1987,adjudging union and its business representative, Joseph Cotter, in further civil contempt of prior contemptadjudications directing posting, mailing, and publishing notices; ordering union to pay furtherfine of $150,000, in addition to fine of $25,000 previously assessed, for a total of $175,000; directingissuance of writ of body attachment against Business Representative Joseph Cotter; fixing reimbursementof <strong>Board</strong> costs and attorneys' fees; order of November 2, 1987, reducing amount of contemptfine to $112,000 and vacation of writ of body attachment on condition of payment of fine within 2weeks; imposition of daily fines of $1000 per day and vacation of stay of arrest order if fine is not paidwithin 2 weeks); NLRB v. Gentsler Tool & Die Corp., in Nos. 84-5699, 85-5830, and 85-5850 (6th Or.)(order of November 16, 1987, adjudging company in civil contempt of the court's December 16, 1985judgment for failing to execute and give effect to collective-bargaining agreement; order directingcompany to honor and give retroactive effect to contract, pay backpay and make whole for loss ofcontract benefits, reimburse <strong>Board</strong> for costs and attorneys' fees, and imposing prospective noncompliancefine of $10,000 per violation and $1000 per day); NLRB v. Shearer, et al., in No. 86-3042 (3d Cir.)(order of December 7, 1987, adjudging, on consent, Robert Shearer and George C. Shearer in civilcontempt of the court's judgments of November 4, 1980, and May 4, 1983, for failing to pay backpayto discriminatees; order directing respondents to pay backpay and to partially reimburse <strong>Board</strong> forcosts and attorneys' fees and imposing prospective noncompliance fine of $10,000 per violation and$1000 per day); NLRB v. WBKB-TV, Channel 11, et al., in No. 85-5871 (6th Or.) (order of December30, 1987, adjudging, on consent, wBKJ3-TV and its president, Steven Marks, in civil contempt of thecourt's order of November 8, 1985, for failing to properly reinstate employees and pay backpay anddiscriminatorily refusing to pay bonuses, refusing to rescind unilateral changes, making additional millateralchanges, refusing to furnish information to the union and abide by an agreed-upon contract,improperly posting <strong>Board</strong> notices, failing to expunge discipline discharge references from personnelrecords; and failing to file compliance status reports with Regional Director; order directing respondentsto, inter alia, comply with court's judgment of November 8, 1985, offer reinstatement and makewhole discrimmatees, furnish information to, and bargain with, the union; partially reimburse <strong>Board</strong>for costs and attorneys' fees and imposing prospective noncompliance fine of $5000 per violation and$500 per day against the company and $500 per violation and $100 per day against Marks, not to berefunded by the company if assessed); NLRB v. <strong>Labor</strong>ers Fund Corp., at al., in No. 81-7401 (9th Cir.)(consent civil contempt adjudication against <strong>Labor</strong>ers Fund Corp. and Fund Secretary David Johnsonfinding them in further violation of the court's judgment of August 14, 1981, and the contempt adjudicationsentered against the Fund on February 16, 1983, November 25, 1983 (as amended January 10,1984 and December 9, 1986, for failing to comply, and fining Fund $105,700 representing fines conditionallysuspended by the court on December 9, 1986, concerning which it was directed to pay$25,000, the balance to be suspended conditioned on compliance for a 2-year period; fining Johnson$15,800, of which $2500 was to be paid and the remainder to be suspended conditioned on future compliancefor 2 years; directing payment by the Fund of $1000 to the <strong>Board</strong> for reimbursement of itscosts and attorneys' fees; and imposing prospective noncompliance fines of $10,000 per violation and$1000 per day against the Fund and $200 per day against each member of the Fund's board of directorsand board of trustees, the Fund's secretary, and any other person or body who has impeded theFund's compliance, not to be reimbursed by the Fund or any other source, if assessed); NLRB v.James K. Stenitt, <strong>In</strong>c., et al., in Nos. 75-4044 and 76-4253 (2d Or.) (order of February 17, <strong>1988</strong>, onconsent, adjudging James K. Sterritt and four other respondents in the case, LIT. Transportation,<strong>In</strong>c., Sandra S. Sterritt, Mark D. Sterritt, and Suzanne Sterritt Tratnack, in civil contempt of thecourt's contempt adjudication of March 25, 1980, and directing them, jointly and severally, to pay the<strong>Board</strong> $45,000 in reimbursement of its costs and attorneys' fees, and to pay $25,000 in fines, remittedContinued
160 Fifty-Third Annual Report of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Labor</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> <strong>Board</strong>fines were assessed 7 and 2 in which the court both ordered thecivil arrest of the respondent's agent and assessed fmes againstthe respondent. 8 Three cases were consummated by settlementorders requiring compliance, 8 and nine cases were discontinfrom$1,343,500 assessed by order of August 17, 1987, on condition on compliance with the contemptadjudication); NLRB v. Iron Workers Local 15, Joint Apprenticeship Committee, in Nos. 86-4060 and 86-4080 (2d Cir.) (order of March 21, <strong>1988</strong>, adjudging the Joint Apprenticeship Committee in civil contemptfor refusing to reinstate employee in violation of the court's judgment of October 14, 1986, anddirecting it to reinstate and pay backpay to discriminatee, to pay <strong>Board</strong> $500 in costs, and to takeother steps, and imposing $503 per day prospective compliance fine commencing 30 days from date oforder); NLRB v. Dickerson Pond Associates, et al., in No. 86-4061 (2d Cir.) (order of March 25, <strong>1988</strong>,adjudging Maureen Erickson, Stewart Muller, et al., d/b/a Dickerson Pond Associates, Ltd., MauretonCorporation, and Maureen Erickson in civil contempt, on default, for failing to pay backpay inviolation of the court's judgment of June 11, 1986, and directing payment of backpay plus interest andpayment of <strong>Board</strong>'s costs and attorneys' fees, and imposing prospective compliance fines against thepartnership and corporation of $10,000 each per violation and $1000 per day, $1000 per violation, and$100 per day against Maureen Erickson and any other person with knowledge of the judgment actingin concert with them); NLRB v. Arnold Cleaners, in No. 86-5756 (6th Cir.) (order of March 28, <strong>1988</strong>,assessing $5000 fine against the company in partial discharge of fines imposed by contempt order enteredAugust 20, 1987, and suspending balance if compliance achieved within 15 days of order; assessing$1000 fine against company president, David Rosenthal, in partial charge of fines previously imposed,and suspending remainder conditioned on compliance; directing issuance of writ of attachmentagainst Rosenthal; and directing reimbursement of <strong>Board</strong>'s costs and attorneys' fees); NLRB v. Shearer,et al., in No. 86-3042 (3d Cir.) (order, on consent, adjudicating Total Transportation Corporation, anotherrespondent in the proceeding, in civil contempt of the court's judgments of November 4, 1980,and May 4, 1983, and directing it to pay all amounts due under the <strong>Board</strong>'s proof of claim as determinedby the bankruptcy court, and imposing prospective compliance fines of $1000 per violation and$500 per day commencing 10 days after entry of the adjudication); NLRB v. Calvin Hill, in No. 84-4401 (5th Cir.) (order, on consent, adjudicating respondent in civil contempt for violating the 8(aX 1)provisions of the court's judgment, and imposing prospective fines of $2500 per violation and $2500per day); NLRB. v. Carlow's Ltd., in No. 86-3711 (3d Cir.) (order of July 18, <strong>1988</strong>, adjudicating respondentin civil contempt for violating the bargaining provisions of the court's judgment of June 15,1984, and directing respondents to comply with the court's judgment, and to reimburse the <strong>Board</strong> forits costs and attorneys' fees, and imposing prospective noncompliance fines of $10,000 per violationand $1000 per day); NLRB v. Service Employees Local 73, in Nos. 79-1706, 79-1715, 79-2193, and 82-2629 (7th Cir.) (order, on consent, entered August 3, <strong>1988</strong>, finding union in civil contempt for violatingthe 8(b)(7) provisions of the court's judgments and prior contempt adjudication, assessing fines of$2500, and imposing increased prospective noncompliance fines of $5000 per violation and $500 perday); NLRB v. Great Lakes Chemical Corp., et al., in No. 77-1732 (6th Cir.) (order of August 24, <strong>1988</strong>,affirming <strong>Board</strong>'s finding that Aquabrom, a division of Great Lakes, was a successor employer to employernamed in the court's judgment and was therefore liable for compliance with that judgment, andwas in civil contempt for failure to recognize and bargain with union as judgment requires; order directingAquabrom to bargain and threatening "appropriate fines" for continued noncompliance);NLRB v. Barnes Excavating Co., in No. 87-2539 (4th Cir.) (order of September 2, <strong>1988</strong>, adjudicatingBarnes in civil contempt, ordering compliance with the court's judgment, directing payment of the<strong>Board</strong>'s costs and attorneys' fees, and imposing prospective noncompliance fines of $5000 per violationand $5000 per day); NLRB v. EPZ <strong>In</strong>c., in No. 85-1501, 85-1502 (4th Cir.) (order of August 31, <strong>1988</strong>,adjudicating company in civil contempt of the court's judgments of May 16 and July 5, 1985, butholding adjudication in abeyance provided the company bargained with union, abided by previous collective-bargainingagreement, rescinded unilateral changes, and took other related actions).7 NLRB v. <strong>Labor</strong>ers Fund Corp., et al., in No. 81-7401 (9th Cir.); NLRB v. James K Sterritt, <strong>In</strong>c., etal., in Nos. 75-4044 and 76-4253 (3d Cir.); NLRB v. Service Employees Local 73, in Nos. 79-1281, 79-1706, 79-1715, 79-2193 (7th Cir.).NLRB v. Newspaper di Mail Deliverers, et al., in No. 86-4034 (3d Cir.); NLRB v. Arnold Cleaners,in No. 86-5756 (6th Cir.).9 NLRB v. Esc° Elevators, in No. 86-4054 (5th Cir.) (settlement order of October 27, 1987, providingfor payment of backpay, pension contributions, and reinstatement of service routes to discrimniateein compliance with the court's judgment of July 23, 1986); NLRB v. James K Sterritt, <strong>In</strong>c., et al., inNos. 75-4044 and 76-4253 (3d Cir.) (order of February 17, <strong>1988</strong>, directing Spancrete Northeast, <strong>In</strong>c.,another respondent in the proceeding, to pay $185,000 in backpay and pension contributions due underthe court's judgment of December 30, 1976); NLRB v. Windsor Place Corp., in No. 86-4030 (3d Cir.)(settlement order of May 24, <strong>1988</strong>, requiring respondent to bargain in good faith with union and providingfor extension of union's certification year).
- Page 2:
SEJOUR BÉBÉ GRATUITLe séjour est
- Page 5 and 6:
; ...
- Page 8 and 9:
TABLE OF CONTENTSCHAPTERPAGEI. Oper
- Page 10:
Table of ContentsIXCHAPTERPAGEVI. S
- Page 13 and 14:
XIITABLEPAGE15B. Geographic Distrib
- Page 16 and 17:
Operations in Fiscal Year 1988 3Dec
- Page 18 and 19:
Operations in Fiscal Year 1988 5CHA
- Page 20 and 21:
Covendimm in Fiscal Year 1988 7CHAR
- Page 22 and 23:
Operations in Fiscal Year 1988 9N,M
- Page 24 and 25:
Operations in Fiscal Year 1988 11CH
- Page 26 and 27:
Operations in Fiscal Year 1988 13C
- Page 28 and 29:
Operations in Fiscal Year 1988 15CH
- Page 30 and 31:
Operations in Fiscal Year 1988 17CH
- Page 32 and 33:
Operations in Fiscal Year 1988 19CH
- Page 34 and 35:
Operations in Fiscal Year 1988 21"N
- Page 36 and 37:
Operations in Fiscal Year 1988 23Tr
- Page 38 and 39:
IINLRB JurisdictionThe Board's juri
- Page 40 and 41:
NLRB Jurisdiction 27that the employ
- Page 42:
NLRB Jurisdiction 29of participatio
- Page 45 and 46:
32 Fifty-Third Annual Report of the
- Page 47 and 48:
34 Fifty-Third Annual Report of the
- Page 49 and 50:
36 Fifty-Third Annual Report of the
- Page 51 and 52:
38 Fffty-Third Annual Report of the
- Page 53 and 54:
40 Fifty-Third Annual Report of the
- Page 55 and 56:
42 Fifty-Thht Annual Report of the
- Page 57 and 58:
44 Fifty-Third Annual Report of the
- Page 59 and 60:
46 Fifty-Third Annual Report of the
- Page 61 and 62:
48 Fifty-Tbird Annual Report of the
- Page 63 and 64:
50 Fifty-Third Annual Report of the
- Page 65 and 66:
52 Fifty-Third Annual Report of the
- Page 67 and 68:
54 Fifty-Third Annual Report of the
- Page 70 and 71:
VUnfair Labor PracticesThe Board is
- Page 72 and 73:
Unfair Labor Practices . 59tection
- Page 74 and 75:
Unfair Labor Practices - 61violated
- Page 76 and 77:
Unfair Labor Practices 63dude, by r
- Page 78 and 79:
Unfair Labor Practices 65with the w
- Page 80 and 81:
Unfair Labor Practices 677. Other I
- Page 82 and 83:
Unfair Labor Practices 69need under
- Page 84 and 85:
Unfair Labor Practices 71cifically,
- Page 86 and 87:
Unfair Labor Practices 73In Delta-M
- Page 88 and 89:
Unfair 'Labor Practices 75future co
- Page 90 and 91:
Unfair Labor Practices 77business e
- Page 92 and 93:
Unfair Labor Practices 79E. Employe
- Page 94 and 95:
Unfair Labor Practices 81was irrele
- Page 96 and 97:
Unfair Labor Practices 83reasonably
- Page 98 and 99:
Unfair Labor Practices 85the future
- Page 100 and 101:
Unfair Labor Practices 87certificat
- Page 102 and 103:
Unfair Labor Practices 89al manager
- Page 104 and 105:
Unfair Labor Practices • 91the Bo
- Page 106 and 107:
Unfair Labor Practices 93approach h
- Page 108 and 109:
Unfair Labor Practices 95In attempt
- Page 110 and 111:
Unfair Labor Practices 97and work f
- Page 112 and 113:
Unfair Labor Practices 99fiscal yea
- Page 114 and 115:
Unfair Labor Practices 101ation" in
- Page 116 and 117:
Unfair Labor Practices 103when he s
- Page 118 and 119:
Unfair Labor Pracdces 1054. Couplin
- Page 120 and 121:
Unfair Labor Practices 107Chairman
- Page 122 and 123: Unfair Labor Practices 109Member Jo
- Page 124 and 125: Unfair Labor Practices 111terprise
- Page 126 and 127: Unfair Labor Practices 113I. Recogn
- Page 128 and 129: :-. - - --,Unfair Labor Practices 1
- Page 130 and 131: Unfair Labor Practices 117spondent
- Page 132 and 133: Unfair Label: Practices 119In Banda
- Page 134 and 135: Unfair Labor Practices 121show that
- Page 136 and 137: Unfair Labor Practices 123mained op
- Page 138 and 139: Unfair Labor Practices 125have the
- Page 140 and 141: Unfair Labor Practices 127The Board
- Page 142: Unfair Labor Practices 129ted by th
- Page 145 and 146: 132 Fifty-Third Annual Report of th
- Page 147 and 148: 134 Fifty-Third Annual Report of th
- Page 149 and 150: 136 Fifty-Third Annual Report of th
- Page 151 and 152: 138 FIfty-Third Annual Report of th
- Page 153 and 154: 140 Fffty-Third Annual Report of th
- Page 155 and 156: 142 Fifty-Third Annual Report of th
- Page 157 and 158: 14 Fifty-Third Annual Report of the
- Page 159 and 160: 146 Fifty-Third Annual Report of th
- Page 161 and 162: 148 Fifty-Third Annual Report of th
- Page 163 and 164: 150 Fffty-Third Annual Report of th
- Page 165 and 166: 152 Fifty-Third Annual Report of th
- Page 167 and 168: 154 Fifty-Third Annual Report of th
- Page 170 and 171: IxContempt LitigationIn fiscal year
- Page 174 and 175: Contempt Litigation 161ued." In one
- Page 176 and 177: Contempt Litigation 163Drug Researc
- Page 178 and 179: XSpecial and Miscellaneous Litigati
- Page 180 and 181: Special and Miscellaneous Litigatio
- Page 182 and 183: Special and Miscellaneous Litigatio
- Page 184 and 185: Special and Miscellaneous Litigatio
- Page 186 and 187: INDEX OF CASES DISCUSSEDPageAqua-Ch
- Page 188: Index of Cases DiscussedUnited Buil
- Page 191 and 192: 178 Fifty-Third Annual Report of th
- Page 193 and 194: 180 Fifty-Third Annual Report of th
- Page 195 and 196: 182 Fifty-Third Annual Report of th
- Page 198 and 199: SUBJECT INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT TABL
- Page 200 and 201: 1157Vptzi,1 Fla4rGa,N : Slwis!,*lop
- Page 202 and 203: Appendix 189Table 2.-Types of Unfai
- Page 204 and 205: Appendix 191illpa Onas00000, 0 0000
- Page 206 and 207: Appendix 193Table 3B.—Formal Acti
- Page 208 and 209: Table 4.—Remedial Actions Taken i
- Page 210 and 211: Appendix1971121 1 i()120 .8 1 (..)1
- Page 212 and 213: Table 5.—Industrial Distribution
- Page 214 and 215: F21rezozp',5:x3 g g .• 2Kg. vo AE
- Page 216 and 217: [:Min1:.1-1t. 1.1:I 1 :*.7T5Ja islE
- Page 218 and 219: vA R....(4)irIxf IF1 1F R1°1i lill
- Page 220 and 221: Table 7.-Analysis of Methods of Dis
- Page 222 and 223:
akOtia"Wt gi g gliMI g1 ..9.t^ 8i &
- Page 224 and 225:
Appendix, 211. 0 M N NO0g m a aod M
- Page 226 and 227:
Appendix 213Table 11.-Types of Elec
- Page 228 and 229:
Table 11B.-Representadon Elections
- Page 230 and 231:
Apiindix 217Table 11E.-Results of R
- Page 232 and 233:
Table 13.-Final Outcome of Represen
- Page 234 and 235:
cOO!ivq-1•-•ta'81§ --LA- Ia4.
- Page 236 and 237:
Table 14.-Valid Votes Cast in Repre
- Page 238 and 239:
Table 14.—Valid Votes Cast in Rep
- Page 240 and 241:
Appendix 227II1011.8§ 0>v>31 8819.
- Page 242 and 243:
i &IIi i1HIF5oFogiti'.R1igIgq.F,Lc
- Page 244 and 245:
4?.zgcEtzg zi l 1 ,F5g.11 11 I'855)
- Page 246 and 247:
Appendix233a7118126Wilnolvti200 A*
- Page 248 and 249:
Table 15C.—Geographic Distributio
- Page 250 and 251:
Appendix 23711.JA1Maia1I3 141OaAi.i
- Page 252 and 253:
ig§g§gg88888888.888°M8MtM"geeSee
- Page 254 and 255:
1100P010100MMn4.08"r!"q30.1J .1.0%t
- Page 256 and 257:
Appendix243sirze-r:viocSciAn i 1 i
- Page 258 and 259:
Appendix24511 liSi:g• il. Ln..Stj
- Page 260 and 261:
Appendix 247Table 22.—Advisory Op