IMPACT OF PIIIMING PATTENNS AND NUTRIENT MANAGf,,MENT ...

4a tooNoutc etta|-Ysts
d...I NET ITTELD BEI{EFITS
Na 6.ld bacit! (NFB) of sg.Jte.s.tr.lcd by ditrratt plann'g p|n.t$,
nutriht lewB &d rlEn itltcddion is ai6 in Tablc. 4.4.1, Sus&ce in dl
ph ing patloE ge ditrel.'t NFB CIlblG 4.4.1 A} Cop EoM in pits
podu.lit Miem NFB ofXr 29oal rrd rr3E t '.!d E fouowld ty tl|d h
doublc row sriF pirl NIB of R! 15507, 2?089 hd dd siiglc row wirh 9818
dd 2U2B $'t, dsirg 192-93 lrd 193-94, r.+€cri!dy. L 1993-94, mp
produc.d mrc NFB d€ to highq sippd.cs idd t' a..srt of nor.
r.wdle rgrc-.linui. coditioB (rrS; 3.2) tur grc*rlt ,nd d.vcloplE of
$8,rcec
Crop ir $c fo.r rutir.ldd! sho*td wi.!L NFB (Ta!L.4.4.1B) h t92-
93, $g&cre tnilizld rirh bio€mto.r + NPK 8|vc
hiShclr NtB ofRr. 28343
h!' &d $! foUow.d by th:r itr NPK d@ ed bio-cooDon .lone sill NFB of
R!.20283 &d 1872t h!t, E pcqndy. otr rlE cotmry, dop wirt oot
fdili:lion dlibilld nel los! oftu 3607 h!r. fthoud sihil& !!nd i. NrB
w obr.iad duiig 193-9, F
rF lon *i, |w!fi, flnl.t NFB w hi8hc,
as a ruult of thc sanc Bon giv.n .tow for pl4ijrg pancrru.
Sug&@ c"nibitd ditrqEt NFB fo. ditr rcit trEtmd i ddioo Crrbt..
4.4.1C). DuinS 1992-91, dop groM a! !I the ptarning Fn€fu wirh out
fdtilialidlho*ql!*rlos lvtiL $gar!4.lFwql hgh.d NIr in pn-pbncd
ce wnh bio€opoll + NPIq NpK rloic sd bi@npo$ d@c ad ws
132