IMPACT OF PIIIMING PATTENNS AND NUTRIENT MANAGf,,MENT ...

adoptior of m. tw ptltlg6 (.) @p rEi!€d .r d.ubb@ stip3 *idt biG
.!'npo61 @ l0 t ht' + NPK @ 75-5C50 kg ha ' c'trnrd NtinC re of
,am Q68 ad 33e/q i' l9r-9t .d l9t-e4, Bpc.rirdy. o) By lEajrc
tlE inEin r4 eta oip B shiecd A6 d.dterow nriF lo pit pt4!.lion
*ilh lhc !.D. &.tilianjon do!., b.rgj'.t ntc of r.16 (959 6d ll!j%) ws
r@.d€d in 199-93 rnd |99rd rc.p.dirdy.
> Sug&ouc 8ro\h at p,Nl grt! siSrifcan ygr.tr.r&t@ridd(Sy, of
15.4 t h4' fouowd by rhar in Pr&, Pl\, p'tll, p: N, &d p! N, Frp.diw!..
Ttc hr.r reo ftdiar sedri@ elF.disrielty on. pe wirfi ah crdE.
on dF 6ilE y, &tn!.E ir rrr,[.dtt_hi.d rtE low6r syof3.o6t h.j, lrd
w prq.d.d !y t!r. b P,I!.. rd p,&, &lrcdndy. ta 1992-93, r|a{qe
Ei!.d 3t P,N' trE dtnifor @iEe src,E EJ, (SR) of 9.6n6. O! th.
co r.ry, ftp ir PNo cxhibilrd rd.imn SR (8. tryo). Simib, rad h SR of
sadcr!. ea r.coxt d duiig t9t44, qc?t the difef$q
rrei'h@t inr!.!.1i@ *q6 norc pronow.d.. DurinS !99_94,
dltbiLd higrE SR 0l!l| rhn in 199%93.
> In I99r-9, $8]qE rdrcd a rrr\I. grw dg!i6.r, osinM oir,.dr
er&rd(t591 td) !d w btbetrd by rta:! p,tt Oj&eo r !j.I O! {E
c.@!ty clop ilP'|.o Fodr..d riSrif6! siiieE rri!?cd-@ yldd of53 t t!-r
srd *a ptlc.dd b itn in p,r\Io &d prNa il$Gqndy. Ib t@ nqd rv|! tubd in
19934a. Ottdadon b.a"!or wdgh di!p.ds!..', i0 lbL er.., e& tagr!
lt9