10.07.2015 Views

are irrational expectations rational? David Demery Nigel W. Duck1 ...

are irrational expectations rational? David Demery Nigel W. Duck1 ...

are irrational expectations rational? David Demery Nigel W. Duck1 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Are Ir<strong>rational</strong> Expectations Rational? 15If a firm forms the expectation of this particular stream of marginal costsas E 2 MC t+i and sets the price accordingly, it will set the price:· ¸Pj,2 ∗ φ∞X= [1 − z] z i E 2 MCφ − 1g t+i0A firm which expects the stream of marginal costs E g j,1 MC j,t+i will anticipatethat the discounted stream of profits from this price (i.e. Pj,2 ∗ )willbe:"· ¸#φ∞X1−φE 1 DPF 2 =[1 − z] z i E j,2 MCφ − 1g 1t+i .1 − z0"· ¸#φ∞X−φ− [1 − z] z i E j,2 MCφ − 1g X ∞j,t+i z i E g j,1 MC j,t+iWrite:∞Xz i E g ∞Xj,2 MC j,t+i = ζ z i E j,1 MC g j,t+i00Then we can write:00"· ¸ φE j,1 DPF 2 = ζ 1−φ [1 − z]φ − 1"· φ−ζ −φ φ − 1¸[1 − z]#∞X1−φx i E g 1j,1 MC j,t+i .1 − z0#∞X−φz i E g X ∞j,1 MC j,t+i z i E j,1 MC g j,t+i00The ratio of the expected discounted profits with Pj,2 ∗ to the expected discountedprofits with Pj,1 ∗ for a firm which expects the stream of marginalcosts given by E g j,1 MC j,t+i will therefore be:³E j,1 DPF 2= ζ(1−φ) φ´(1−φ) ³−φ´³φ−1 −φ´−φζφ−1³E j,1 DPF 1 φ´(1−φ) ³ (10)φ−1 − φ´−φφ−1which has a maximum of 1 when ζ =1.We use this framework to assess the loss of profits a firm would anticipatefrom choosing a less than complete set of information or deploying a methodof <strong>expectations</strong> formation different from RE. Our approach is as follows. Foreach simulation we generated a value for ε t and for u j,t . On the assumptionthat all previous realizations of the shocks were zero, we then, for givenvalues of θ, φ and β, 11 calculated four sets of optimal prices for a firm which11 In the simulations reported in Table 5, we assume φ =6, which implies a mark-upparameter (ϕ) of 1.2. This is the value assumed by Sbordone (2002) and is within therange (1.1 to 1.4) suggested as plausible by Galí et al (2001).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!