Heparins and mechanical methods for thromboprophylaxis in ...

G R A P H S A N D O T H E R T A B L E SAnalysis 01.01. Comparison 01 Thromboembolic events (TE). LDH vs. no treatment., Outcome 01 DVTReview: Heparins and mechanical methods for thromboprophylaxis in colorectal surgeryComparison: 01 Thromboembolic events (TE). LDH vs. no treatment.Outcome: 01 DVTStudy LDH No treatment Peto Odds Ratio Weight Peto Odds Ration/N n/N 95% CI (%) 95% CIGallus 1976 5/44 13/46 58.4 0.35 [ 0.13, 0.98 ]Joffe 1976 2/8 3/6 13.6 0.36 [ 0.04, 3.06 ]x Kosir 1996 0/3 0/7 0.0 Not estimableRem 1975 4/19 7/12 27.9 0.21 [ 0.05, 0.91 ]Total (95% CI) 74 71 100.0 0.30 [ 0.14, 0.67 ]Total events: 11 (LDH), 23 (No treatment)Test for heterogeneity chi-square=0.36 df=2 p=0.83 I² =0.0%Test for overall effect z=2.97 p=0.0030.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10Favours treatmentFavours controlAnalysis 01.02.Review:Comparison:Outcome:Comparison 01 Thromboembolic events (TE). LDH vs. no treatment., Outcome 02 PE, nostudiesHeparins and mechanical methods for thromboprophylaxis in colorectal surgery01 Thromboembolic events (TE). LDH vs. no treatment.02 PE, no studiesStudy LDH No treatment Peto Odds Ratio Weight Peto Odds Ration/N n/N 95% CI (%) 95% CITotal (95% CI) 0 0 0.0 Not estimableTotal events: 0 (LDH), 0 (No treatment)Test for heterogeneity: not applicableTest for overall effect: not applicable0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10Favours treatmentFavours controlHeparins and mechanical methods for thromboprophylaxis in colorectal surgery (Review)Copyright © 2006 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd22