Heparins and mechanical methods for thromboprophylaxis in ...

Analysis 05.01. Comparison 05 Thromboembolic events (TE). LMWH vs. placebo, Outcome 01 DVTReview: Heparins and mechanical methods for thromboprophylaxis in colorectal surgeryComparison: 05 Thromboembolic events (TE). LMWH vs. placeboOutcome: 01 DVTStudy LMWH Placebo Peto Odds Ratio Weight Peto Odds Ration/N n/N 95% CI (%) 95% CIValle 1988 0/6 1/5 100.0 0.11 [ 0.00, 5.68 ]Total (95% CI) 6 5 100.0 0.11 [ 0.00, 5.68 ]Total events: 0 (LMWH), 1 (Placebo)Test for heterogeneity: not applicableTest for overall effect z=1.10 p=0.30.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10Favours treatmentFavours controlAnalysis 05.02. Comparison 05 Thromboembolic events (TE). LMWH vs. placebo, Outcome 02 PE, no studiesReview: Heparins and mechanical methods for thromboprophylaxis in colorectal surgeryComparison: 05 Thromboembolic events (TE). LMWH vs. placeboOutcome: 02 PE, no studiesStudy LMWH Placebo Peto Odds Ratio Weight Peto Odds Ration/N n/N 95% CI (%) 95% CITotal (95% CI) 0 0 0.0 Not estimableTotal events: 0 (LMWH), 0 (Placebo)Test for heterogeneity: not applicableTest for overall effect: not applicable0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10Favours treatmentFavours controlAnalysis 05.03.Review:Comparison:Outcome:Comparison 05 Thromboembolic events (TE). LMWH vs. placebo, Outcome 03 DVT and/orPE. Same as in “DVT”.Heparins and mechanical methods for thromboprophylaxis in colorectal surgery05 Thromboembolic events (TE). LMWH vs. placebo03 DVT and/or PE. Same as in ”DVT”.Study LMWH Placebo Peto Odds Ratio Weight Peto Odds Ration/N n/N 95% CI (%) 95% CITotal (95% CI) 0 0 0.0 Not estimableTotal events: 0 (LMWH), 0 (Placebo)Test for heterogeneity: not applicableTest for overall effect: not applicable0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10Favours treatmentFavours controlHeparins and mechanical methods for thromboprophylaxis in colorectal surgery (Review)Copyright © 2006 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd28