5 <strong>July</strong> <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong>, Construction and Building Materials <strong>Egypt</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong>Executive summaryOutlookThe <strong>Egypt</strong>ian real estate market <strong>of</strong>fers attractive long-term prospects in an acutelyundersupply environment, supported by solid fundamentals such as a large and growingpopulation (the largest in MENA), a high proportion <strong>of</strong> young people and increasingdisposable income. The capital, Cairo, is benefiting immensely from the urbanization anddevelopment <strong>of</strong> satellites (East/West Cairo), where the population density is lower and quality<strong>of</strong> life higher. Our analysis suggests that Cairo’s residential market will witness a widershortfall from 264k units (5% <strong>of</strong> demand) in 2009E to 730k (11%) by 2014E, <strong>of</strong> which c.35%stems from the mid to high income segments where our developers under coverageoperate.At first glance, by comparing price to income ratios for select cities in the world, it seemsthat a mid income apartment is still affordable. However, <strong>Egypt</strong>’s case is unique as it isprimarily a cash market with no access to mortgage for <strong>of</strong>f plan properties. Our analysissuggests stretched affordability for the mid-income segment after sharp property priceincreases (c.50-60% between 2007-Q1 <strong>2010</strong>). As a result we only see limited property priceappreciation in <strong>2010</strong>-11. Furthermore, we see short-term challenges for <strong>Egypt</strong>ian developerswith increasing risks, especially on the regulatory side. We believe the sector is exposed topotential negative outcome/news flow on the land acquisition process which could affectinvestor confidence on the <strong>Egypt</strong>ian story. While we do not expect major cancellations <strong>of</strong>land agreements as such a scenario would negatively impact the government’s credibility andput <strong>of</strong>f foreign investors, we see uncertainties dominating the <strong>Egypt</strong>ian story. Investorsshould closely monitor the upcoming events, especially the hearing <strong>of</strong> the Madinaty case on<strong>July</strong> 17 th <strong>2010</strong>. The election period could also trigger a ‘wait and see attitude’ among futurehomebuyers in their purchasing decisions. Overall we see a risk that ST challenges distractinvestors from the LT growth story.Our analysis shows that investors are valuing <strong>Egypt</strong>ian developers without differentiatingrisks and quality/location <strong>of</strong> the landbank. With minimal land liabilities, differentiated/flexibledevelopment model, strongest balance sheet (EGP1.2bn net cash,40% <strong>of</strong> market cap.) and aquality/cheap landbank highly discounted by the market, <strong>SODIC</strong> is our best play. PHD is themost leveraged play on the property market with the highest outstanding land liabilities (1.2x2009 equity) and limited potential for property price increases, in our view. TMG <strong>of</strong>fers thebest exposure to the mid income segment. However, the potential outcome <strong>of</strong> litigation onits Madinaty land remains difficult to predict and adds risk to the investment case. We initiatewith a Buy on <strong>SODIC</strong>, Hold on TMG and PHD.ValuationWe value <strong>Egypt</strong>ian developers on a SOTP basis. We value development properties usingDCF, while we limit our presales to 2012E. Investment properties are taken at 2009 BV whenthe property is immature; otherwise, we use comparative industry multiples to gross pr<strong>of</strong>it.Landbank is valued by benchmarking to 2007 auction prices in Cairo or taking appropriatediscounts (based on the quality/location <strong>of</strong> landbank) on our estimated NAV.Risks<strong>Egypt</strong>ian developers are exposed to: (1) regulatory risk on land agreements; (2) executionrisk; (3) availability <strong>of</strong> financing; (4) backlog cancellation/presales slowdown; (5) stretchedaffordability; (6) economic conditions; and (7) consumer confidence.<strong>Deutsche</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> AG/London Page 3
5 <strong>July</strong> <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong>, Construction and Building Materials <strong>Egypt</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong>Investment strategy<strong>Egypt</strong>ian developers outperformed the CASE index in 2009Since their peaks in 2008, <strong>Egypt</strong>ian developers’ share prices have plunged significantly in linewith global trends and have underperformed the respective stock indices. However, since2009, the trend has reversed and the real estate index has outperformed the CASE. This isprimarily due to the resilient pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the real estate developers (solid backlog, low customerdefaults and low gearing), as physical demand for real estate remained strong on the back <strong>of</strong>a growing economy and acute undersupply.Figure 1: <strong>Egypt</strong>ian real estate vs. CASE, beginning 2008(base 100)Figure 2: <strong>Egypt</strong>ian real estate vs. CASE, beginning 2009(base 100)1<strong>2010</strong>080604020-30025020015010050-Jan-08Apr-08Jul-08Oct-08Jan-09Apr-09Jul-09Oct-09Jan-10Apr-10Jan-09Apr-09Jul-09Oct-09Jan-10Apr-10RE IndexCASERE IndexCASESource: Reuters, <strong>Deutsche</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>Source: Reuters, <strong>Deutsche</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>After selling <strong>of</strong>f the sector as a whole in 2008, investors have been selective in their stockpicking in 2009, with TMG outperforming the sector. We believe TMG’s outperformance canbe attributed to 2 factors: (1) its positioning in the right segment (mid- to mid-upper income)where demand remains solid; and (2) its strong financial pr<strong>of</strong>ile, coupled with no outstandingliabilities (payment for Madinaty land to be made in kind, which is currently under litigation).PHD’s underperformance can be attributed to its outstanding land liabilities (1.2x 2009equity). <strong>SODIC</strong>’s underperformance can be attributed to the immature nature <strong>of</strong> its assets(mostly prime land) and high-end positioning (despite strong sales momentum and minimumcancellations in 2009).Figure 3: <strong>Egypt</strong> real estate equity performances, sinceMay 2008 (base 100)Figure 4: <strong>Egypt</strong> real estate equity performances,beginning 2009 (base 100)120300100250802006015040200May-08 Jul-08 Sep-08 Nov-08PHD TMG OCDI CASESource: Reuters, <strong>Deutsche</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>100500Jan-09 Apr-09 Jul-09 Oct-09 Jan-10 Apr-10PHD TMG OCDI CASESource: Reuters, <strong>Deutsche</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>Page 4<strong>Deutsche</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> AG/London
- Page 1: CompanyGlobal Markets ResearchMiddl
- Page 6 and 7: 5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 9 and 10: Page 8 Deutsche Bank AG/LondonFigur
- Page 11 and 12: 5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 13 and 14: 5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 15 and 16: 5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 17 and 18: 5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 19 and 20: 5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 21 and 22: 5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 23 and 24: 5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 25 and 26: 5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 27 and 28: 5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 29 and 30: 5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 31 and 32: 5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 33 and 34: 5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 35 and 36: 5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 37 and 38: 5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 39 and 40: 5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 41 and 42: 5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 43 and 44: 5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 45 and 46: 5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 47 and 48: 5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 49 and 50: 5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 51 and 52: 5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 53 and 54: 5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 55 and 56:
5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 57 and 58:
5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 59 and 60:
5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 61 and 62:
5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 63 and 64:
5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 65 and 66:
5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 67 and 68:
Page 66 Deutsche Bank AG/LondonFigu
- Page 69 and 70:
5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 71 and 72:
5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 73 and 74:
5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 75 and 76:
5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 77 and 78:
5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 79 and 80:
5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 81 and 82:
5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 83 and 84:
5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 85 and 86:
5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 87 and 88:
5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 89 and 90:
5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 91 and 92:
5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 93 and 94:
5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 95 and 96:
5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 97 and 98:
5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 99 and 100:
5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 101 and 102:
5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 103 and 104:
5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 105 and 106:
5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 107 and 108:
5 July 2010 Real Estate, Constructi
- Page 109:
Deutsche Bank AG/LondonMiddle East