Long Range Plan For The Klamath River Basin ... - KrisWeb

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Olsen, and Big Creeks) may reduce anadromous fish escapement by an estimated 80percent between 1990 and 1998 (Goines 1988).The fires have created both challenges and opportunities for the Forest Service.Seeking the appropriate balance in treating ground cover for fuel management anderosion control is one of the critical challenges related to water quality and fish habitat.TABLE 2-1 -- Major Geologic Units in the Klamath and Trinity Basins 1 .(California Portion Only) (In Square Miles)Geologic Assemblage Klamath Trinity TotalAlluvium 166 - 166Lake Deposits 318 - 318Nonmarine Sediments 41 - 41Volcanic Rocks 2,675 - 2,675Marine Sediments 42 - 42Franciscan Formation 246 24 270Granitic Rocks 535 413 948Basic Intrusives (gabbro) 24 72 96Ultra-basic Intrusives (serpentine, pyronxenite) 460 278 638Older Marine Sediments 394 232 626Undifferentiated Metamorphics 982 999 1,981Metamorphosed Sediments 250 201 451Metamorphosed Volcanics 353 81 434Oldest Sediments/Metamorphics 550 669 1,219Totals 7,036 2,969 10,0051 From: USSCS, 1972. North Coastal River Basins, Main ReportTABLE 2-2 -- Klamath National Forest Fires of 1987 Subbasin Acreage Burnedby Level of Intensity 1 .Intensity Burned in acresWatershed Total Area Burned High Medium LowElk Creek 24,329 1,956 10,979 11,394Salmon River 78,128 13,832 17,325 46,971Indian Creek 4,710 231 2,525 1,954Thompson Creek 6,372 367 3,305 2,700Clear Creek 20,341 1,662 8,433 10,246Grider Creek 11,404 370 3,670 7,364Scott River 8,649 684 2,488 5,477Small tributaries 62,911 8,018 21,638 33,255Total 216,844 27,120 70,363 119,3611 Compiled from compartment data provided by R. Van de Water.
Page 1 and 2: Long Range Plan For The Klamath Riv
Page 4: EXECUTIVE SUMMARYTHE KLAMATH ACTPub
Page 7 and 8: With the help of an inventory of fi
Page 9 and 10: WHERE TO FIND SUBJECTS IN THIS PLAN
Page 11 and 12: CONTENTS (Continued)The Restoration
Page 13 and 14: Figure TitleLIST OF ILLUSTRATIONSPa
Page 15 and 16: LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS (continued)Fi
Page 17 and 18: CHAPTER 1INTRODUCTIONFOREWARDThe su
Page 19 and 20: KLAMATH RIVER BASIN FISHERIES TASK
Page 21 and 22: Restoration Program. The firm of Wi
Page 23 and 24: Figure 1-1 - Karuk tribal fisherman
Page 25 and 26: Salmonid Enhancement Program (SEP)
Page 27 and 28: Developing Goals and ObjectivesReca
Page 29 and 30: CHAPTER 2HABITAT PROTECTION AND MAN
Page 31 and 32: At the end of each subsection is a
Page 35: occurred around 1600 and again abou
Page 40 and 41: Figure 2-5 - Logging in Siskiyou Co
Page 42 and 43: sustained yield potential. This "un
Page 44 and 45: 1960, selective cutting was the gen
Page 46 and 47: Figure 2-7 - Tractor and cable clea
Page 48 and 49: watershed was considered in 1980 to
Page 50 and 51: Figure 2-9a - Extent of riparian zo
Page 52 and 53: Spawning salmon and steelhead can s
Page 54 and 55: Herbicides used to control competin
Page 56 and 57: while others were definitely inadeq
Page 58 and 59: The land management planning proces
Page 60 and 61: The National Wild and Scenic Rivers
Page 62 and 63: 2.A.2. Contribute to evaluating the
Page 64 and 65: three to four feet long, flopping a
Page 66 and 67: Figure 2-10 - Gold dredge at work a
Page 68 and 69: Many other problems were also noted
Page 70 and 71: to build the flood levee at Klamath
Page 72 and 73: Impacts of Mining on Salmon and Ste
Page 74 and 75: instance, if sand is dredged up to
Page 76 and 77: TABLE 2-3CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF F
Page 78 and 79: Other Miningo Frequency of dredging
Page 80 and 81: AGRICULTURESee also Stream Diversio
Page 82 and 83: Agricultural RunoffStream pollution
Page 84 and 85: Figure 2-13 - Changes in cross-sect
Page 86 and 87:
o Large woody debris from riparian
Page 88 and 89:
(Sections 1601-1606). The agency al
Page 90 and 91:
WATER AND POWER PROJECTSIssuesWATER
Page 92 and 93:
asin then being constructed by the
Page 94 and 95:
Current Large Dam IssuesIron Gate D
Page 96 and 97:
or on waters designated "Wild Trout
Page 98 and 99:
Figure 2-16 - Concept for Ultimate
Page 100:
In 1981, the California Department
Page 103 and 104:
development projects on the Klamath
Page 105 and 106:
time,According to W.H. Shebley, the
Page 107 and 108:
ConclusionsStream habitat protectio
Page 109 and 110:
STREAM DIVERSIONSIssues* Habitat da
Page 111 and 112:
Figure 2-19 - Water surface areas b
Page 113:
Problem sections of the stream syst
Page 116 and 117:
still have a problems. On Horse Cre
Page 118 and 119:
Figure 2-22 - Temperature preferenc
Page 120 and 121:
water before it was needed just to
Page 122 and 123:
(The Upper Klamath Basin's water ri
Page 124:
instream flows awarded to the Servi
Page 127 and 128:
Stream Diversion RegulationsRegulat
Page 129 and 130:
g. Contribute financial support to
Page 131 and 132:
Despite the recognition that these
Page 133 and 134:
Improving Access to Spawning AreasB
Page 135 and 136:
Special Restoration Techniques Appr
Page 137 and 138:
While erosion prevention work may s
Page 139 and 140:
(Lisle 1981). If the streambed has
Page 141 and 142:
the stream was altered. Steelhead a
Page 143 and 144:
sediment deposits near the stream m
Page 145 and 146:
seeding vast areas with grasses, an
Page 147 and 148:
Evaluation ... of any habitat manip
Page 149 and 150:
Lower Klamath TributariesThe waters
Page 151 and 152:
sediment inputs. Similar problems w
Page 153 and 154:
Flow reductions make temperature pr
Page 155 and 156:
Changes in Channel Width Highlight
Page 157 and 158:
THE RESTORATION PROGRAM'S NATURAL A
Page 159 and 160:
Workshops sponsored by the Humboldt
Page 161 and 162:
POLICIES FOR HABITAT RESTORATIONObj
Page 163 and 164:
c. Find a solution to the problem o
Page 165 and 166:
Before Europeans settled in the Kla
Page 167 and 168:
years for each easily detectable ch
Page 169 and 170:
Detailed identification of stock di
Page 171 and 172:
and Shasta River fall chinook showe
Page 173 and 174:
TABLE 4-1 Tentative stock groups of
Page 175 and 176:
The Salmon River and its Wooley Cre
Page 177 and 178:
pointed out that the diversity migh
Page 179 and 180:
Green Sturgeon (Acipenser medirostr
Page 181 and 182:
EULACHONThe eulachon, or candlefish
Page 185 and 186:
een declining and estimated escapem
Page 187 and 188:
Coho SalmonCoho were once abundant
Page 189 and 190:
Summer SteelheadThe U.S. Fish and W
Page 191 and 192:
American ShadNo data.EulachonIndian
Page 193 and 194:
Table 4-4 -- Stocks of Critical Con
Page 195 and 196:
THE CHALLENGE OF CONSERVING MIXED S
Page 197 and 198:
Green sturgeon are often harvested
Page 199 and 200:
nations. In response to this concer
Page 201 and 202:
other fish all eat juvenile salmoni
Page 203 and 204:
The Department of Fish and Game's N
Page 205 and 206:
een important for subsistence in th
Page 207 and 208:
POLICIES FOR FISH POPULATION PROTEC
Page 209 and 210:
Klamath River Basin Fall Chinook Sa
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
CHAPTER 5FISH POPULATION RESTORATIO
Page 217 and 218:
Snyder (1931) was concerned in the
Page 219 and 220:
Hatchery may have been in part as a
Page 221 and 222:
Figure 5-1 -- Iron Gate staff show
Page 223 and 224:
TABLE 5-5 -- Annual Production of J
Page 225 and 226:
Disease and Operational ProblemsDis
Page 227 and 228:
migration. Chapman (1989) found tha
Page 229 and 230:
Oregon hatchery programs used coho
Page 231 and 232:
gene resources through appropriate
Page 233 and 234:
Figure 5-4 -- Trends of Canadian pr
Page 235 and 236:
In the lower Klamath, the Yurok hav
Page 237 and 238:
water temperatures led to the closi
Page 239 and 240:
FISH RESCUEEvery year juvenile salm
Page 241 and 242:
CONCLUSIONWhile artificial producti
Page 243 and 244:
POLICIES FOR FISH POPULATION RESTOR
Page 245 and 246:
CHAPTER 6EDUCATION AND COMMUNICATIO
Page 247 and 248:
Video materials conveying informati
Page 249 and 250:
Communications MethodsRestorationPr
Page 251 and 252:
and planning team members have expl
Page 253 and 254:
CHAPTER 7PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIONThis
Page 255 and 256:
CommitteesThe Task Force has decide
Page 257 and 258:
Figure 7-1 -- Klamath River Fishery
Page 259 and 260:
Besides the outlay of cash contribu
Page 261 and 262:
Additional new funding sources (See
Page 263 and 264:
River Basin or the effectiveness of
Page 265 and 266:
o State-Federal Clean Water Act pro
Page 267 and 268:
The USFWS has two offices serving t
Page 269 and 270:
management of anadromous fish habit
Page 271 and 272:
Hoopa Valley TribeThe 2,000 member
Page 273 and 274:
guidance and is responsible to the
Page 275 and 276:
State of OregonDepartment of Fish a
Page 277 and 278:
CitiesGoverned by a City Council, e
Page 279 and 280:
a list of several formal and inform
Page 281 and 282:
Council CoordinationHow to best coo
Page 283 and 284:
proposals, to respond to questions
Page 285 and 286:
POLICIES FOR PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION
Page 287 and 288:
e. Support publication of the resul
Page 289 and 290:
CHAPTER 8CONCLUSIONSINTRODUCTIONThi
Page 291 and 292:
7. Agricultural management practice
Page 293 and 294:
26. The Task Force will work with t
Page 295 and 296:
STEP-DOWN STRUCTUREOF THE RESTORATI
Page 297 and 298:
3. Promote a better record-keeping
Page 299 and 300:
2.E.8. Seek the establishment of la
Page 301 and 302:
d. Exploring the feasibility of usi
Page 303 and 304:
3.13 The Task Force will undertake
Page 305 and 306:
4.8 The Task Force will support the
Page 307 and 308:
6.2. The Task Force will support co
Page 309 and 310:
. Facilitate the coordination of in
Page 311 and 312:
Goal II:Goal III.Goal IV:Goal V:Sup
Page 313 and 314:
oodstock: adult fish retained for a
Page 315 and 316:
ecosystem: community of organisms i
Page 317 and 318:
hydrology: study of distribution, c
Page 319 and 320:
outplanting: transportation and rel
Page 321 and 322:
suckers: fish belonging to the fami
Page 323 and 324:
Barnhardt, R.A. 1986. Species profi
Page 325 and 326:
California Dept. of Fish and Game.
Page 327 and 328:
California State Water Resources Co
Page 329 and 330:
Earth Science Associates. 1980. Low
Page 331 and 332:
Gee, A.S., N.J. Milner, and R.J. He
Page 333 and 334:
Hedrick, R.P., S.E. LaPatra, J.L. F
Page 335 and 336:
Jones, J.R. 1953. Saddle Bags in Si
Page 337 and 338:
Light, J.T., S. Fowler, and M. Dahl
Page 339 and 340:
Metlar, G.M. 1856. Northern Califor
Page 341 and 342:
O'Connel, M.F. and C.E. Bourgeois.
Page 343 and 344:
Reiser, D.W. and T.C. Bjornn. 1979.
Page 345 and 346:
Shields, W.M. 1982. Philopatry, Inb
Page 347 and 348:
Thomas, V.G. 1985. Experimentally d
Page 349 and 350:
U.S. Forest Service. 1983(?). Water
Page 351 and 352:
Whiteley, A.H. 1989. Food Additives
Page 353 and 354:
Hillman, Leaf: Karuk Tribal represe
Page 355 and 356:
PHOTO AND ILLUSTRATION CREDITS(wher
Page 364 and 365:
APPENDIX BEVALUATION OF PRIOR KLAMA
Page 366 and 367:
Bluff Creek (11022, 23, 24, 31, 32-
Page 368 and 369:
MIDDLE KLAMATH SUBBASIN:Beaver Cree
Page 370 and 371:
Independence Creek (6019-$5,000): T
Page 372 and 373:
Specimen Creek (5016-$500): Steelhe
Page 374 and 375:
APPENDIX CA FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY E
Page 376 and 377:
That work, commissioned by the Cali
Page 378 and 379:
3. Values Included in the AnalysisT
Page 380 and 381:
Table 2Estimates of Potential Benef
Page 382 and 383:
These estimates will, of course, ne
Page 384 and 385:
LONG RANGE PLAN FOR THEKLAMATH RIVE
Page 386 and 387:
Additionally, comments received dur
Page 388 and 389:
o Program Administrationoo Task For
Page 390 and 391:
Figure 1 Location of Klamath River
Page 392 and 393:
Table 1Status of Threatened, Endang
Page 394 and 395:
Table 2 (continued)StatusSpecies Fe
Page 396 and 397:
These possible effects are being mi
Page 398 and 399:
The California Dept. of Fish and Ga
Page 400 and 401:
V. CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION WI
Page 402 and 403:
KLAMATH RIVER BASIN FISHERY RESTORA
show all

Long Range Plan For The Klamath River Basin ... - KrisWeb

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?