22.11.2012 Views

Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film

Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film

Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Independent <strong>Film</strong><br />

a Dream, 1999), Christopher Nolan (the thriller<br />

Memento, 2000, about a man with no short-term memory<br />

caught in the middle <strong>of</strong> a murder mystery), and Todd<br />

Solondz (the sexually explicit college-set drama<br />

Storytelling, 2001). While opportunities for women directors<br />

remained scant in mainstream Hollywood, a number<br />

<strong>of</strong> young female auteurs got the opportunity to direct low<br />

budget indie features. Some delved into contemporary<br />

questions regarding gender identity (Kimberly Peirce’s<br />

Boys Don’t Cry, 1999), while others explored growing<br />

up female (Catherine Hardwicke’s Thirteen and S<strong>of</strong>ia<br />

Coppola’s The Virgin Suicides, 1999).<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> indie titles were marketed to large<br />

niche audiences, most significantly the youth audience.<br />

The most popular indie film <strong>of</strong> all time was the teenhorror<br />

picture The Blair Witch Project (1999), a film that<br />

to great effect aped the look and style <strong>of</strong> a typical student<br />

film. Several more polished alternative teen horror films<br />

followed, many <strong>of</strong> them played with equal amounts <strong>of</strong><br />

thrills and satire: Wes Craven’s popular Scream series–<br />

Scream (1996), Scream 2 (1997), and Scream 3 (2000)<br />

and the Scary Movie franchise–Scary Movie (2000), Scary<br />

Movie 2 (2001), and Scary Movie 3 (2003)–were all<br />

distributed by Miramax’s teen-label Dimension <strong>Film</strong>s.<br />

While bawdy teen comedies like American Pie (1999)<br />

and its sequels (American Pie 2, 2001, and American<br />

Wedding, 2003) continued to be a staple among the<br />

major studio release slates, a series <strong>of</strong> darker, more troubling<br />

teenpics appeared on the indie circuit, films like<br />

Richard Kelly’s exploration <strong>of</strong> adolescent madness<br />

Donnie Darko (2001), the disconcerting coming <strong>of</strong> age<br />

film Igby Goes Down (2002), the nerd satire Napoleon<br />

Dynamite (2004), the anti-establishment road trip picture<br />

Harold and Kumar Go to White Castle (2004), and the<br />

generation-next coming <strong>of</strong> age movie Garden State (2004).<br />

Making a film on the indie circuit also <strong>of</strong>fered<br />

opportunities to mainstream performers, especially movie<br />

stars, to acquire something akin to ‘‘indie cred.’’ At the<br />

very least, it allowed glamorous movie stars a chance to<br />

showcase their talent playing ‘‘against type.’’ For example,<br />

the beautiful African American actress Halle Berry<br />

won an Academy Award Ò for her performance in Marc<br />

Foster’s Monster’s Ball (2001). With an unflattering haircut,<br />

little makeup, and dingy clothes, Berry played a<br />

waitress who has an affair with a racist jailer after her<br />

husband is executed. Two years later, the South African<br />

model turned star actress Charlize Theron followed<br />

Berry’s lead winning an Oscar Ò for her portrayal <strong>of</strong> the<br />

serial killer Aileen Wuornos in Patty Jenkins’s Monster.<br />

Diversifying into the small indie market has had its<br />

advantages for the major film companies. Though many<br />

<strong>of</strong> their boutique titles have not made them much<br />

money, they have added much-needed prestige to industry<br />

release slates otherwise dominated by empty action<br />

pictures. When boutique releases win prizes at festivals<br />

like Sundance, Cannes, Venice, Berlin, and Toronto or<br />

awards at the Golden Globes or Oscars Ò, they boost the<br />

studio’s reputation. Control over the indie-sector also<br />

gives the major studios something very close to complete<br />

control over the entire American cinema landscape, a<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> control that in the 21st century renders the<br />

term ‘‘independent’’ not only conditional but perhaps<br />

even obsolete.<br />

SEE ALSO Art Cinema; Exhibition; Exploitation <strong>Film</strong>s;<br />

Producer; Studio System; Yiddish Cinema<br />

FURTHER READING<br />

Biskind, Peter. Down and Dirty Pictures: Miramax, Sundance and<br />

the Rise <strong>of</strong> Independent <strong>Film</strong>. New York: Simon & Schuster,<br />

2004.<br />

Goodell, Gregory. Independent Feature <strong>Film</strong> Production: A<br />

Complete Guide from Concept to Distribution. New York:<br />

St. Martin’s, 1982.<br />

Kleinhans, Chuck. ‘‘Independent Features: Hopes and Dreams.’’<br />

In The New American Cinema. Edited by Jon Lewis. Durham,<br />

NC: Duke University Press, 1998.<br />

Levy, Emanuel. Cinema <strong>of</strong> Outsiders: The Rise <strong>of</strong> Independent<br />

<strong>Film</strong>. New York: New York University Press, 2001.<br />

McCarthy, Todd, and Charles Flynn, eds. Kings <strong>of</strong> the Bs:<br />

Working Within the Hollywood System. New York: Dutton,<br />

1975.<br />

Pierson, John. Spike, Mike, Slackers and Dykes: A Guided Tour<br />

Across a Decade <strong>of</strong> Independent Cinema. New York: Hyperion,<br />

1995.<br />

Rosen, David. Off-Hollywood: The Making and Marketing <strong>of</strong><br />

Independent <strong>Film</strong>. New York: Independent Feature Project<br />

and Burbank, CA: Sundance Institute, 1987<br />

Schaefer, Eric. Bold! Daring! Shocking! True!: A History <strong>of</strong><br />

Exploitation <strong>Film</strong>s, 1919–1959. Durham, NC: Duke<br />

University Press, 1999.<br />

Jon Lewis<br />

12 SCHIRMER ENCYCLOPEDIA OF FILM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!