22.11.2012 Views

Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film

Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film

Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

India<br />

the 1970s, the antecedent to the generation <strong>of</strong> diasporic<br />

filmmakers is Merchant-Ivory Productions—the combined<br />

effort <strong>of</strong> the producer Ismail Merchant (1936–<br />

2005), from India, the director James Ivory (b. 1928),<br />

from the United States, and the writer Ruth Prawer<br />

Jhabvala (b. 1927), <strong>of</strong> Polish-German descent, who<br />

together have made films about Indo-British encounters<br />

during and after the mid-1960s using a more or less fixed<br />

ensemble <strong>of</strong> Indian and British actors. Diasporic cinema<br />

since the late 1980s has focused instead on the experiences<br />

<strong>of</strong> middle- and working-class immigrants in their<br />

host countries, in particular the ways in which they<br />

negotiate cultural distance from the homeland. The audience<br />

is both the Indian diaspora and the middle class, a<br />

section <strong>of</strong> which dwells in both domains. Although the<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> these films varies, some auteurs stand out:<br />

Srinivas Krishna (b. 1913) and Deepa Mehta (b. 1950)<br />

in Canada, Gurinder Chadha (b. 1966) and Hanif<br />

Qureshi (b. 1954) in the United Kingdom, and Mira<br />

Nair (b. 1957) in the United States. Some auteurs<br />

have forged international collaboration around financial<br />

investment, distribution, and even talent. In searching for<br />

their own distinctive aesthetic, some have tried to appropriate<br />

or pay homage to popular cinema by adopting its<br />

most significant insignia, the song and dance sequence,<br />

whereas others have chosen realism, comedy, or lampoon<br />

as their preferred style.<br />

In the twenty-first century, some in Hollywood have<br />

been carefully following the lead taken by diasporic filmmakers<br />

in collaborating with the mainstream Bombay<br />

film industry. Hindi cinema and Hollywood, long functioning<br />

in parallel global markets, have begun to take<br />

stock <strong>of</strong> the mutual benefits collaboration might bring.<br />

Hollywood is driven by its interest in novelty, lower<br />

production costs, and cheaper talent, the same forces<br />

behind globalization. For the Bombay industry’s new<br />

generation <strong>of</strong> filmmakers, who since the 1990s have<br />

energetically experimented with commercial cinema, this<br />

presents an opportunity to tie in new sources <strong>of</strong> international<br />

capital, especially after the spectacular losses the<br />

industry suffered in 2002, and the lure <strong>of</strong> a crossover<br />

market beyond its domestic and diasporic audience.<br />

However, some Indian filmmakers are keen to win this<br />

market on their own terms, which to them means pre-<br />

serving the charm, romance, and aesthetic <strong>of</strong> popular<br />

Hindi cinema.<br />

SEE ALSO National Cinema<br />

FURTHER READING<br />

Barnouw, Erik, and S. Krishnaswamy. Indian <strong>Film</strong>. 2nd ed.<br />

New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1980.<br />

Chakravarty, Sumita. National Identity in Indian Popular<br />

Cinema, 1947–1987. Austin: University <strong>of</strong> Texas Press, 1993.<br />

Creekmur, Corey. ‘‘Picturizing American Cinema: Hindi <strong>Film</strong><br />

Songs and the Last Days <strong>of</strong> Genre.’’ In Soundtrack Included,<br />

edited by Pamela Robertson-Wojick and Arthur Knight.<br />

Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2001.<br />

Dwyer, Rachel, and Divya Patel. Cinema India: The Visual<br />

Culture <strong>of</strong> Hindi <strong>Film</strong>. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers<br />

University Press, 2002.<br />

Gopalan, Lalitha. Cinema <strong>of</strong> Interruptions: Action Genres in<br />

Contemporary Indian Cinema. London: British <strong>Film</strong> Institute,<br />

2002.<br />

Kabir, Nasreen Munni. Guru Dutt: A Life in Cinema. New ed.<br />

New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2005.<br />

Mishra, Vijay. Bollywood Cinema: Temples <strong>of</strong> Desire. New York:<br />

Routledge, 2002.<br />

Nandy, Ashis, ed. The Secret Politics <strong>of</strong> Our Desires: Innocence,<br />

Culpability, and Indian Popular Cinema. New Delhi: Oxford<br />

University Press, 1998.<br />

Pendakur, Manjunath. Indian Popular Cinema: Industry, Ideology<br />

and Consciousness. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2003.<br />

Prasad, M. Madhava. Ideology <strong>of</strong> the Hindi <strong>Film</strong>: A Historical<br />

Construction. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1998.<br />

Rajadhyaksha, Ashish, and Paul Willemen. <strong>Encyclopedia</strong> <strong>of</strong> Indian<br />

Cinema. Revised ed. New Delhi: Oxford University Press,<br />

1995.<br />

Thomas, Rosie. ‘‘Sanctity and Scandal: The Mythologization <strong>of</strong><br />

Mother India,’’ Quarterly Review <strong>of</strong> <strong>Film</strong> and Video 11<br />

(1989): 11–30.<br />

Thoraval, Yves. The Cinemas <strong>of</strong> India (1896–2000). Delhi:<br />

Macmillan India, 2000.<br />

Vasudevan, Ravi, ed. Making Meaning in Indian Cinema. New<br />

Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2000.<br />

Virdi, Jyotika. The Cinematic ImagiNation: Indian Popular <strong>Film</strong>s<br />

As Social History. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University<br />

Press, 2003.<br />

Corey K. Creekmur<br />

Jyotika Virdi<br />

22 SCHIRMER ENCYCLOPEDIA OF FILM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!