22.11.2012 Views

Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film

Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film

Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Independent <strong>Film</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> independence is possible only when films make so<br />

little money they simply are not worth the studios’ time<br />

or effort to own or control. The strange fact <strong>of</strong><br />

American filmmaking, especially in the modern era, is<br />

that a director—even an unknown and inexperienced<br />

director—can expect to enjoy far more creative autonomy<br />

working on a $1.5–3 million so-called independent film<br />

than on a $15–30 million studio picture. The minute<br />

significant studio investment is in play, the minute significant<br />

box-<strong>of</strong>fice is at stake, a filmmaker’s independence is<br />

subject to second-guessing by executives whose primary<br />

task is to protect the company’s bottom line.<br />

While the relation between independent and mainstream<br />

or commercial cinema has been an important<br />

question in every nation that has had an established film<br />

industry—Japan, India, France, Italy, and the United<br />

Kingdom, for example—what follows surveys the history<br />

<strong>of</strong> American independent cinema beginning with the<br />

very first alternatives to Edison’s early films and the cartel<br />

he subsequently founded. Of interest as well are the niche<br />

films that proliferated in the early years <strong>of</strong> studio<br />

Hollywood, the Poverty Row B-genre pictures <strong>of</strong> the<br />

1930s–1950s, exploitation cinema from the 1920s<br />

through the 1960s, the so-called new American cinema<br />

avant-garde in New York in the 1960s and 1970s, and the<br />

various independent cinemas that emerged as Hollywood<br />

conglomerized and monopolized the entertainment market<br />

after 1980.<br />

INDEPENDENCE IN EARLY AND SILENT<br />

AMERICAN CINEMA<br />

So far as most American film histories and the US Patent<br />

Office are concerned, movies in the United States began<br />

with Thomas Edison (1847–1931). First there were the<br />

patents on the Edison Kinetograph (the photographic<br />

apparatus that produced the pictures) and the<br />

Kinetoscope (the ‘‘peep show’’ viewing machine that<br />

exhibited them) in 1891. And then there was the first<br />

public demonstration <strong>of</strong> the Edison motion picture apparatus<br />

at the Brooklyn Institute <strong>of</strong> Arts and Sciences in<br />

May 1893, the place and date <strong>of</strong> what most agree was the<br />

first publicly exhibited movie. The speed at which things<br />

moved from this first showcase (which included the<br />

screening <strong>of</strong> Edison’s crude moving picture Blacksmith<br />

Scene, showing three men, all Edison employees, hammering<br />

on an anvil for approximately twenty seconds) to<br />

the production <strong>of</strong> entertaining and occasionally edifying<br />

short movies was astonishingly fast. Edison had his Black<br />

Maria Studio in New Jersey fully outfitted by the time<br />

the Brooklyn Institute showcase was held. His first full<br />

slate <strong>of</strong> movies was available for screening by January <strong>of</strong><br />

the following year.<br />

In the spring <strong>of</strong> 1894, Edison renamed his company<br />

the Edison Manufacturing Company. The new name highlighted<br />

the business <strong>of</strong> making and selling Kinetoscope<br />

equipment that seemed so promising in 1894, and also<br />

clarified Edison’s vision about the medium and his role in<br />

it. Movies were produced not by artists but by experts in<br />

the technology <strong>of</strong> motion picture production. They were<br />

made much as other products <strong>of</strong> industry were made on<br />

assembly lines, by nameless, faceless workers toiling on<br />

behalf <strong>of</strong> the company whose name was featured prominently<br />

on the product.<br />

American cinema was initially just Edison, but<br />

domestic competition in the new medium emerged fairly<br />

soon thereafter. Viewing independent cinema as an alternative<br />

to a commercial mainstream, it is with these<br />

first companies that took on Edison that independent<br />

American cinema began. Edison’s first real competitor<br />

was the American Mutoscope Company, later renamed<br />

the American Mutoscope and Biograph Company (routinely<br />

referred to simply as Biograph). Biograph was a<br />

particularly irksome competitor for two reasons: (1) one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the principals in research and development at the<br />

company was William K. L. Dickson (1860–1935), an<br />

inventor who resigned from his position at Edison in<br />

1895 after doing most <strong>of</strong> the work on the Kinetograph<br />

and the Kinetoscope; and (2) the company worked in<br />

70mm, a superior format that provided four times the<br />

image surface <strong>of</strong> the Edison and international industry<br />

standard <strong>of</strong> 35mm. With its first slate <strong>of</strong> films, Biograph<br />

courted the carnival crowd. While Edison stuck mostly<br />

to documentary short subjects, the Biograph company<br />

founders Harry Marvin, Herman Casler, Elias Koopman,<br />

and Dickson viewed cinema as first and foremost an<br />

attraction. Their first films featured boxing bouts and<br />

demonstrations <strong>of</strong> fire-fighting equipment, but soon<br />

thereafter their ‘‘bread and butter’’ became crude gag<br />

films (that is, short films that played out a single<br />

comic skit).<br />

Once the movies caught on—and it did not take<br />

long—several other film companies emerged. In<br />

December 1908, when it became clear that such a free<br />

market (<strong>of</strong> independent film producers and distributors)<br />

might quickly cost Edison his prominent role in the<br />

industry, the inventor created the Motion Picture Patents<br />

Company (MPPC) trust. The trust linked the interests <strong>of</strong><br />

Edison and nine <strong>of</strong> his competitors: Biograph, Vitagraph,<br />

Essanay, Kalem, Selig Polyscope, Lubin, Star <strong>Film</strong>, Pathé<br />

Freres, and Klein Optical. The MPPC effectively exploited<br />

key industry patents on motion picture technology to fix<br />

prices, restrict the distribution and exhibition <strong>of</strong> foreignmade<br />

pictures, regulate domestic production, and control<br />

film licensing and distribution. The trust was supported by<br />

an exclusive contract with the Eastman Kodak Company,<br />

the principal and at the time the only dependable provider<br />

2 SCHIRMER ENCYCLOPEDIA OF FILM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!