10.07.2015 Views

Framework for Economic Growth, Pakistan - Planning Commission

Framework for Economic Growth, Pakistan - Planning Commission

Framework for Economic Growth, Pakistan - Planning Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

International conference on “<strong>Framework</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Growth</strong>, <strong>Pakistan</strong>”Questions and AnswersQUESTION:Question: We discussed about RBM and public-private partnership. Why is this not working in<strong>Pakistan</strong>?Question: We have Prime Minister’s Inspection <strong>Commission</strong> in <strong>Pakistan</strong>. Why that commissionis not doing the job to effectively monitor and evaluate the results in the country?Question: We are talking about growth in the country. In a country where we have load sheddinghow can we go <strong>for</strong> the growth?Question: <strong>Economic</strong> growth comes with the introduction of new products and processes in theeconomy. My question is that how government is monitoring actions in term of innovation inproducts and processes, innovation in society and institutions etc?Question: In RBM we heard about disbursement of budgets against outcomes. I was justwondering that it takes long time to know about the results then how this tool would work in thereal world?Question: What is our strategy to make public and private sector accountable? And how peopleare going to be the part of this strategy in context of role of local government?ANSWERS:Answer by Dr. Akmal Hussain, Professor, Beaconhouse National University:In <strong>Pakistan</strong> decision are being made at topdownbasis in. The Prime Minister or theChief Ministers <strong>for</strong>get taking feedback fromthe inspection team or the feedback is vagueand doesn’t work as it should. We talkedabout two kinds of institutional mechanisms<strong>for</strong> ensuring that public sector servicedelivery becomes questionable. Oneimportant thing is to identify clearly timeboundobjectives. Second important thing isthe evaluation of per<strong>for</strong>mance inmeasureable terms. My point is that insteadof internal per<strong>for</strong>mance based efficiency andcontrols we also need to have a system ofexternal evaluation where we can linkservice delivery with community basedorganizations. There are many communitybased organizations working at district,tehsil and village level which can be linkedup with the local government deliverysystem.I would also like to say that new productsand processes are essential <strong>for</strong> sustainedeconomic growth of the country. It is theduty of the government to provide a setup tohave such impacts <strong>for</strong> the development ofnew products and processes. But theproblem is that how we measure thatimpact? I think that Dr. Nadeem and histeam has tried to bring together what all newliterature in the last three decades oneconomics suggest. It tells that new productsand processes and innovation occur as aresult of opening up of the economy <strong>for</strong>private sector competition where a largenumber of economic actors outsidegovernment compete and their survival44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!