10.07.2015 Views

Nya Svetsaren 1, 1999. - Luleå University of Technology

Nya Svetsaren 1, 1999. - Luleå University of Technology

Nya Svetsaren 1, 1999. - Luleå University of Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

comparable table arrangementfor a dry process. What is more,handling cutting with water tablestakes time and introduces otherdisadvantages like those touchedupon earlier.However, the dry processesalso have inherent disadvantageswhen it comes to the environmentalissues <strong>of</strong> noise and, particularlyin the case <strong>of</strong> laser, radiation.As has already been said,the use <strong>of</strong> laser cutting will increaseas a result <strong>of</strong> reduceddross appearance, greater accuracyand the higher productivitythat can be obtained with dry cuttingtables.The author believes that thiswill take place, although the actualcutting speed for laser versusplasma-water at the present time,for 20 mm MS, for example, is 1m/min compared with 3 m/min.For shipyards in particular,when they invest in new cuttingfacilities, it will be attractive tochange to laser and it will alsothen be possible to handle the environmentalissues in the idealmanner. In short, this will resultin the complete removal <strong>of</strong> theoperator and other manual activitiesfrom the installation site anda change to complete reliance onremote control, remote handlingand remote surveillance. For thesupplier and designer <strong>of</strong> thesecutting installations, there is stillsome way to go before all the facilitiesfor the programming andsurveillance <strong>of</strong> the relevant cuttingparameters are available, butit is thought that this will be thetrend in development as far as laseris concerned. While this is beingimplemented, we shall probablysee the development <strong>of</strong> thelaser technique towards copingwith thicker material while maintainingthe level <strong>of</strong> precision. Thecurrent standard is 25–30 mm forMS. The double-focus techniqueis one way <strong>of</strong> achieving this.Finally, it is worth noting thatlaser cutting lends itself to interestingprecision jobs such as contourcutting, with or without bevel,in one operation on twodimensionalor three-dimensionalworkpieces, also including thecutting <strong>of</strong> small holes, with orwithout chamfers. Figures 6 and 7Fig. 6. An S-axis laser-cutting head which is fully programmable.Fig. 7. A modern laser-cutting installation for large plate formats with screeningfrom radiation.illustrate this development in lasercutting.At present, fine-beam plasmacutting has potential for thin platecutting which can be furtherexploited when the appropriatesolutions for reducing or avoidingthe inherent noise level are introduced.Fine-beam plasma cutting isvery attractive investment-wise,as compared with laser cutting,for a number <strong>of</strong> applications wherethe highest precision is notnecessary (compare with Fig. 2).At the same time, it is to be expectedthat, within the foreseeablefuture, fine-beam plasma willincrease in capability from thepresent maximum 20 mm thicknessup to a maximum <strong>of</strong> 50 mm,both figures referring to MS.SummaryOver the years, environmental issueshave become an increasinglyimportant point on the agendawhen it comes to the design <strong>of</strong>cutting systems. The current technology,its productivity merits anddeficiencies are briefly described,as they relate to present and upcomingenvironmental issues inthe fields <strong>of</strong> dust, fume and gases,noise, radiation and ergonomicsin general. With that as the startingpoint, a discussion <strong>of</strong> the outlookfor improvements–the waysand means <strong>of</strong> establishing improvedenvironmental conditions,while paying due consideration toproductivity, as seen through theeyes <strong>of</strong> a manufacturer <strong>of</strong> cuttingsystems, featuring a horizonstretching into the next millennium–ispresented.About the author:Klaus Decker, Dipl.-Ing. isManaging Director <strong>of</strong> ESABCUTTING SYSTEMS.<strong>Svetsaren</strong> No.1–2 1999 37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!