microleakage in class ii composite restorations ... - ePrints@USM
microleakage in class ii composite restorations ... - ePrints@USM
microleakage in class ii composite restorations ... - ePrints@USM
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
LIST OF TABLESPageTable 3.1: Description of study groups ........................................................................... 53Table 3.2: Composition of adhesive systems employed <strong>in</strong> this study ............................ 54Table 3.3: Composition of <strong>composite</strong>s employed <strong>in</strong> this study ...................................... 54Table 4.1 Reproducibility of dye penetration measurements ......................................... 68Table 4.2: Comparison of <strong>microleakage</strong> between the G Bond adhesive system (n=52)and Adper s<strong>in</strong>gle bond 2 adhesive system (n=52) .......................................................... 69Table 4.3: Comparison of <strong>microleakage</strong> between nano-<strong>composite</strong> (Filtek Z350) (n=52)and microhybrid <strong>composite</strong> ( Filtek Z250) (n=52) ......................................................... 70Table 4.4: Comparison of <strong>microleakage</strong> between all study groups ................................ 71ix