Woodcock-JohnsonÂ® III - Riverside Publishing

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ReferencesAmerican Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association(APA), and National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). (1999).Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: AmericanEducational Research Association.Beal, A. L., Dumont, R. P., Branche, A. H., & Cruse, C. L. (1996). Validation of theWISC-III short form for Canadian students with learning disabilities. Canadian Journalof School Psychology, 12, 1–6.Beal, A. L., Dumont, R. P., Cruse, C. L., & Branche, A. H. (1996). Practical implication ofdifferences between the American and Canadian norms for the WISC-III and a shortform for children with learning disabilities. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 12,7–14.Braden, J., & Alfonzo, V. P. (2003). The WJ III Tests of Cognitive Abilities in cognitiveassessment courses. In F. A. Schrank & Flanagan, D. P. (Eds.), WJ III Clinical Use andInterpretation: Scientist-Practitioner Perspectives. San Diego: Academic Press.Canadian Psychological Association. (1996). Guidelines for Educational and PsychologicalTesting. Ottawa, Ontario: Author.Carroll, J. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York:Cambridge University Press.Cizek, G. J. (2003). Review of the Woodcock-Johnson III. In B. S. Plake & J. C. Impara(Eds.), The fifteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp.1020–1024). Lincoln, NE:Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.Connolly, A. (2000). KeyMath - Revised Canadian Education Normative Update.San Antonio, TX: Pearson.Connolly, A. (2007). KeyMath3 Diagnostic Assessment. San Antonio, TX: ThePsychological Corporation.Connolly, A. (2008). KeyMath3 Canadian Edition. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.Cummings, J. A. (1995). Review of the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised. In J. C. Conoley & J. C. Impara (Eds.), The twelfth mental measurementsyearbook (pp. 1113–1116). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.Elliott, C. D. (2007). Differential Ability Scales–Second Edition. San Antonio, TX: HarcourtAssessment.Ford, L., Percy, A., & Negreiros, J. (2010). Canadian cognitive assessment training.Paper accepted for presentation at the annual meeting of the Canadian PsychologicalAssociation, Winnipeg, Manitoba.Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004a). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children,(2nd ed). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004b). Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement,Second Edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.16
Hicks, P. & Bolan, L. P. (1996). Review of the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-EducationalBattery–Revised. Journal of School Psychology, 6(4), 93–102.Hildebrand, D., & Saklofske, D. H. (1996). The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–ThirdEdition: A Canadian Standardization Study. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 12,74–76.International Test Commission (2000). International guidelines for test use. http://www.intestcom.org.Iverson, G. L., & Lange, R. T., & Viljoen, H. (2006). Comparing the Canadian andAmerican WAIS-III normative systems in inpatient neuropsychiatry and forensicpsychiatry. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 348–353.Joint Advisory Committee. (1993). Principles for fair student assessment practices foreducation in Canada. Edmonton, Alberta: Author.Lee, S. W., & Stefany, E. (1995). Review of the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-EducationalBattery–Revised. In J. C. Conoley & J. C. Impara (Eds.), The twelfth mentalmeasurements yearbook. (pp. 1116–1117). Lincoln, NE: The University of NebraskaPress.McGrew, K. S. (1997). Analysis of the major intelligence batteries according to aproposed comprehensive Gf-Gc framework. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L.Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp.151–179). New York: Guilford.McGrew, K. S. (2005). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities: Past,present, and future. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporaryintellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 136–182). New York: Guilford.McGrew, K. S. (2009). Editorial: CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project:Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research.Intelligence, 37, 1–10.McGrew, K. S., & Woodcock, R. W. (2001). Technical Manual. Woodcock-Johnson III.Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing.McGrew, K., Dailey, D., & Schrank, F. (2007). Woodcock-Johnson III/Woodcock-JohnsonIII Normative Update score differences: What the user can expect and why (Woodcock-Johnson III Assessment Service Bulletin No. 9). Rolling Meadows, IL: RiversidePublishing.Mark. R., Beal, A. L., & Dumont, R. (1998). Validation of a WISC-III short form for theidentification of Canadian gifted students. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 14,1–10.Reddon, J. R., Whippler, S. M., & Reddon, J. E. (2007). Seemingly anomalous WISC-IVFull Scale IQ scores in the American and Canadian standardization samples. CurrentPsychology, 26, 60–69.Roid, G. (2003). The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fifth Edition. Rolling Meadows, IL:Riverside Publishing.17
Page 6 and 7: III DS). In addition to the CHC clu
Page 8 and 9: 6education level (chi-square = 4.56
Page 10 and 11: InstrumentationCanadian participant
Page 12 and 13: Table 3.Descriptions of WJ III NU A
Page 14 and 15: Table 4.Means and Standard Deviatio
Page 16 and 17: Table 6.Means and Standard Deviatio
Page 20 and 21: Saklofske, D. H., Hildebrand, D. K.
Page 24: 3800 Golf Road, Suite 100Rolling Me

Woodcock-JohnsonÂ® III - Riverside Publishing

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?