The Use of Native Plants for Revegetation along West Virginia ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 30. Total plant cover of Spring plantings at Parkersburg with and without fertilizer, seeded with various mixtures, and treatment combinations. Treatment Parkersburg Jun-02 Parkersburg Jun-03 Parkersburg Jun-04 Fertilizer -------------%------------- Fertilized 91 1 77 a* 82 a Unfertilized Seed Mix 87 76 a 79 a DOH 89 64 a 75 a DOH-Native 90 71 ab 77 a ½ DOH-Native 89 87 b 85 a Native 86 80 ab 84 a Control Interactions 93 82 b 82 a DOH Fertilized 91 60 a 84 a DOH Unfertilized 86 68 a 66 b DOH-Native Fertilized 94 75 ab 76 ab DOH-Native Unfertilized 86 66 a 77 a ½ DOH-Native Fertilized 86 86 b 87 a ½ DOH-Native Unfertilized 91 88 b 83 a Native Fertilized 91 77 ab 82 a Native Unfertilized 80 82 ab 86 a Control Fertilized 94 87 b 83 a Control Unfertilized 91 76 ab 81 a *Treatments within main effects (fertilizer, seed mix, or interactions) and within columns (sites) with the same letter are not significantly different (p=0.05). 1 No significant differences were found for the June 2002 survey. 54
Table 31. Seeded native cover of Spring plantings at Baker with and without fertilizer, seeded with various mixtures, and treatment combinations. Treatment Baker Jun-02 Baker Jun-03 Baker Jun-04 Fertilizer -------------%------------- Fertilized 1* 0 4 a 1 Unfertilized Seed Mix 1 0 4 a DOH 0 0 0 b DOH-Native 2 0 0 b ½ DOH-Native 3 0 0 b Native 3 2 21 a Control Interactions 0 0 0 b DOH Fertilized 0 0 0 b DOH Unfertilized 0 0 0 b DOH-Native Fertilized 1 0 0 b DOH-Native Unfertilized 2 0 0 b ½ DOH-Native Fertilized 3 0 0 b ½ DOH-Native Unfertilized 2 0 0 b Native Fertilized 3 2 22 a Native Unfertilized 2 1 20 a Control Fertilized 0 0 0 b Control Unfertilized 0 0 0 b *No significant differences were found for the June 2002 and 2003 surveys. 1 Treatments within main effects (fertilizer, seed mix, or interactions) and within columns (sites) with the same letter are not significantly different (p=0.05). 55
Page 1 and 2:
The Use of Native Plants for Revege
Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract………
Page 5 and 6:
Table 15. Total plant cover of Spri
Page 7 and 8:
1. Introduction Due to the mountain
Page 9 and 10: Table 1. Species, mixtures and rate
Page 11 and 12: cost more than $5.00 per pound of p
Page 13 and 14: (1987) found good stands of Switchg
Page 15 and 16: Brown-eyed Susan (Rudbeckia triloba
Page 17 and 18: high temperatures, drought, or poor
Page 19 and 20: Figure 1. Map of research sites inc
Page 21 and 22: Table 2. Seeded species and seeding
Page 23 and 24: Table 4. Seeded species and seeding
Page 25 and 26: Table 5. Total plant cover of Sprin
Page 31 and 32: Table 11. Seeded native cover of Fa
Page 33 and 34: Table 13. Seeded native cover of Fa
Page 35 and 36: Results indicate that one cannot se
Page 37 and 38: Table 16. Total plant cover of Spri
Page 39 and 40: Table 18. Total plant cover and see
Page 41 and 42: Table 20. Seeded native cover of Sp
Page 43 and 44: Table 22. Individual species respon
Page 45 and 46: cover prior to plot establishment c
Page 47 and 48: Table 23. Chemical properties of th
Page 49 and 50: native cover. Some of the younger s
Page 51 and 52: program. The disturbance of a strip
Page 53 and 54: Hsu, F.H., C.J. Nelson, and A.G. Ma
Page 55 and 56: Vassey, T.L., J.R. George, and R.E.
Page 57 and 58: Table 27. Total plant cover of Fall
Page 59: Table 29. Total plant cover of Fall
Page 67 and 68: Table 37. Total plant cover of Spri
Page 71: Table 41. Seeded native cover of Sp
show all

The Use of Native Plants for Revegetation along West Virginia ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?