10.07.2015 Views

From 'grey to green'- investigating the capabilities of the ... - lumes

From 'grey to green'- investigating the capabilities of the ... - lumes

From 'grey to green'- investigating the capabilities of the ... - lumes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

‘an ecological responsibility’” (Persson cited in Matti 2006:3). The statement <strong>of</strong> creating a ‘green welfarestate’ as <strong>the</strong> government have communicated also means that <strong>the</strong> contract between <strong>the</strong> individual and <strong>the</strong>state has increased in also including <strong>the</strong> environment. This means that <strong>the</strong> State had decided <strong>to</strong> also protect<strong>the</strong> environment in its actions (Sandstedt 2004:78). The policies are <strong>to</strong> transcended <strong>to</strong> all policy areas insociety aiming at developing <strong>the</strong> current welfare state from <strong>the</strong> 1990’s <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> 21 st century ‘Green peopleshome’ (Matti 2006:3).Sustainability: The definition <strong>of</strong> sustainability that will be applied in this <strong>the</strong>sis is <strong>the</strong> definition that is used by<strong>the</strong> Swedish government, as it is that sustainability policy that will be analysed. “The strategy covers all threedimensions <strong>of</strong> sustainable development: economic, social and environmental. The strategy proceeds from along-term vision <strong>of</strong> sustainable development” (www.sweden.gov.se/sb/d/7023 10/05-07).I have chosen <strong>to</strong> use this type <strong>of</strong> definition, as it is <strong>the</strong> foundation for <strong>the</strong> Swedish SustainableDevelopment policy construction. This can be argued as problematic however as this is <strong>the</strong> foundation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Swedish environmental policies and this is <strong>the</strong> type <strong>of</strong> Sustainable Development that will be analysed <strong>the</strong>concept <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial statements by <strong>the</strong> government will be used. The reason for using this version is based onthat <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>sis is not a policy analysis and <strong>the</strong> concept will <strong>the</strong>refore not be problematised, however one mustacknowledge that <strong>the</strong> concept can and should be seen with a critical perspective as <strong>the</strong> notion <strong>of</strong> SD can beinterpreted in many ways.Institutional sustainability: An institution is a well-established entity with public status. The affiliates interactbased on specific roles and codes <strong>of</strong> conduct. The institution is an “organ <strong>of</strong> government mandate by <strong>the</strong>constitution” (Hague & Harrop 2001:63). An institution serves as building blocks that form social and politicallife (Skjaerseth 1999:58). Institutions are defined by explicit set <strong>of</strong> guided rules and implicit rules as norms andvalues (Duit 2002:17). March and Olsen (1984) defines <strong>the</strong> institutions over time <strong>to</strong> be shaped by politicalstructure and his<strong>to</strong>rical experience, “The information about that experience is encoded in institutional rules(March and Olsen 1984:28). The institution is <strong>the</strong>refore changing through experience. Institutional change inregards <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> environmental debate can be based on <strong>the</strong> increased knowledge about <strong>the</strong> environmental impac<strong>to</strong>f human behaviour and can <strong>the</strong>refore change based on this increased knowledge. In this <strong>the</strong>sis institutions willbe represented by <strong>the</strong> bureaucratic organisation. Institutional Sustainability in this <strong>the</strong>sis, consequently based on<strong>the</strong> above definition, is defined by <strong>the</strong> organisational ability <strong>to</strong> implement <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r three pillars<strong>of</strong> sustainability. Consequently, being defined through <strong>the</strong> <strong>capabilities</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> institutional structure, exemplifiedby <strong>the</strong> bureaucratic organisation within <strong>the</strong> public administration, <strong>to</strong> implement <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r three pillars <strong>of</strong>Sustainable Development.2.3 DispositionThe <strong>the</strong>sis is structured in four parts; <strong>the</strong> first part will identify <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical framework, which identifies<strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical explanations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> current Swedish bureaucratic setting based on Weber’s <strong>the</strong>ories <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bureaucratic organisation and Lundquists model <strong>of</strong> ac<strong>to</strong>rs within this structure. The secondpart will identify <strong>the</strong> current structure in <strong>the</strong> bureaucratic system, based on secondary material, and will serveas a foundation for pre knowledge in regards <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical section <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>sis. It will also give a briefintroduction <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> Region Skåne SD policy implementation and identify <strong>the</strong> process and backgroundthat developed <strong>the</strong> national policies <strong>to</strong>wards SD in Sweden and <strong>the</strong> his<strong>to</strong>rical and political process that hastaken place <strong>to</strong> reach <strong>the</strong> current sustainability policy.This section will serve as background and pre knowledge <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> analytical part and will provide withan overview <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Swedish bureaucratic setting within <strong>the</strong> state, and <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> type <strong>of</strong> SDpolicy used in Sweden <strong>to</strong>day. The third part will give an ac<strong>to</strong>r approach <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> current bureaucratic systemthat identifies <strong>the</strong> ac<strong>to</strong>rs and <strong>the</strong> obstacles <strong>the</strong>y encounter according <strong>to</strong> implementation <strong>the</strong>ory duringimplementation within <strong>the</strong> current system structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bureaucratic system. The forth part will give <strong>the</strong>framework for <strong>the</strong> case study and its structure, <strong>the</strong> current structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bureaucratic system based on bothsystem/structure as well as an ac<strong>to</strong>r approach based on empirical material in <strong>the</strong> case. This will be followed8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!